tanstaafl
2008-01-03 10:33:54
Would it be slanderous to note that the convoluted verbiage known as shari’a law elaborated (and re-elaborated)in the centuries since The Prophet (PBUH) is written as a highly self serving tool for purposes of maintaining “religious authority” ?
Or that a central tenet of Islamists in Denmark, in Great Britain, in Canada, in France and (apparently) in the United States is to keep up pressure for principles of shari’a to erode and (eventually) replace civil and constitutional law ?
Would it be slanderous to note that some “western” courts are bending over and spreading ‘em to accommodate these incursions ?
