Kevin
2008-01-02 23:10:13
If the Second Circuit said the state had to hear it first, then it is implied that, even with the NY state court ruling, this matter is not over in the courts. Sounds like the process needed to be followed in order for the federal court to make a ruling. The problem still lies in the UK. It’s rather loose standards of libel allow for abuse. Furthermore, is Eady’s word the final say in the matter in the UK?
