No Rick, you’re wrong. Bush was exactly what the world needed at this time in history. Someone that would sacrific themselves and there legacy to accomplish things that had to be accomplished.
A world with a Taliban still terrorizing a nation and a region. Saddam still threatening, or perhaps have taken action instead of just expounding his rhetoric. THAT threat was very real. So was the capability. Imagine if you would the conseguences of a WMD (he still had his scientist, he still had his labs, he still had the raw ingredients, and he still had his hate and his desire to do harm), used by himself or supplied to a terror group (Hamas?) and used against israel… what retaliation would have occured? Think big numbers here, for thats the probability.
Bush was the man we alway express as our desire for a President. One who would weight the facts and do what was right, not what was politically expedient and popular. One that wouldn’t shy away from doing or making the hard choice. One that would lead us down the hard road if that is what it takes to get to where we need to be. Bush, he did all of that. And he probably never shed a tear over the press not “liking” him.
No, the world is a far far better place due to George W. Bush. Even Obama has quietly come to know that. Too bad that is lost on you.
http://mydismalswamp.wordpress.com/2009/01/15/snakebit/
