Very interesting post, and comments thread with a few notable exceptions. I learned some things, which I confess is a difficult thing for me to say about PJM.
I have to agree, though, that there is a world of difference between questioning whether certain facts in the story were overblown for publicity purposes (not an uncommon litigation strategy) or exaggerated by reporters for news pop (also not uncommon), and suggesting that the victim is a slut who is now lying in the hopes of getting a big payday. Bob Owens hinted at it, and some comments ran with it.
I think it would be a shame, and much to PJM’s discredit, if the legitimate issues (such as skepticism about KBR destroying evidence) are lumped in with assertions that have no basis in fact and are cruel to boot.
