Emilia
2007-12-10 18:43:15

Well, Mr. Hummel, it seems that if Schuyler doesn’t have any cognitive disability, she should be able to be in the so-called “normal” class as long as she has her assistive technology with her, just like a child who can’t walk would always have his or her wheelchair.

I don’t think funding is a big issue, but we should use the funds we have in an appropriate manner so that they are not wasted but used in a way that benefits everyone (disabled child, other students, teachers, school as an institution, etc.). For instance, it would be a waste of money to have my cousin with Down syndrome sit in an advanced grade 11 physics class just so she could be with the “normal” kids: she couldn’t understand anything, and the teacher would use valuable time trying to explain things to her. So funding might be better spent on a class with a lower teacher: student ratio where she learned skills she could actually use. On the other hand, I wouldn’t view the use of funds to help a child in a wheelchair attend the same physics class, because he or she would learn something in there.

Again, the solution depends on the individual child and the individual disability.