No, I don’t think they should marry because it is a fine line between aborting a child and an adult in the family court—and ironically, the women have the ‘power’ to do both. The women come to the marriage with a distinct advantage and as such one would ask, then why should they not marry? Well, if they had any honor or character at all they would admit the reality of the current dysfunction in our society and within the family courts. So this is what I predicate my injunction upon, if they have honor, character, accountability, altruism and self-lessness then they should not marry because they would know that since they are at a distinct advantage over the well-being and natural rights of their would be children and their would be husband, they should have some character and abstain from marriage until the current situation is rectified. Don’t hold your breathe though because women are known to allow their passions to cloud their intellect in pursuit of those things they deem to be ‘good.’ So, obviously the inverse statement would be for men to not get married and I am merely suggesting that a woman should not get married either in the current situation if they were altruistic—but don’t hedge your bets on that one for it is not the ‘modern’ ethic and as such, women are incable of discerning what to do next—that is to say, they are incapable of doing or pursuing something they don’t want and if it is a child to fulfill their nature, woe to that child and father for hers is maternal bolshevism allied with judicial bolshevism.
