ETAB
2011-11-28 11:23:00
true peers – AGW is an ideology, and has similarities to religious ideology in that its axioms are based on faith not science, but I wouldn’t call it a religion. It’s essentially a political-economic movement, labeled as science but hidden within an ideology with religious overtones, i.e., you aren’t supposed to question its axioms. I reject its axioms by the way. But I don’t consider that it gives humans as a species, a history as a species. Do we consider accepting dogma as science to be evidence of our historical development as a species?
And I’m not a fan of Latour either. I disagree with the postmodern view of language, nature/nurture etc. And can’t stand Griemas.
You and I probably have no ideas in common!
