Gotta like how these bozos like Bill Bradley and Alan Miller wave what they think is evidence around, but when you look carefully, it’s all smoke and mirrors.
People thinking that the 9/11 commission did a poor job doesn’t prove anything at all about whether there was anything malicious going on in the government about knowing about 9/11 in advance. I’d bet money that if the ‘intelligence experts’ quoted were researched, they’re probably partisans who would like nothing better than to make the current President look bad. Mobying isn’t limited to just political websites, after all.
When you look at their evidence, there’s no ‘there’ there. If you want to have 9/11 ‘criminally investigated’, then you had better come up with something that a prosecutor wouldn’t laugh out of court. What, you don’t have anything? Then put up or shut up.
At least the people with the ‘grassy knoll’ theory of Kennedy’s assassination claim to have witnesses that say gunfire came from there. These 9/11 Truthers don’t even have that much; all they have is hearsay and conjecture. It’s all as credible as blaming the Bavarian Illuminati and the Gnomes of Zurich.
