Okay—and I cannot tell that, Mr. Solway reads law—but, I think, there’s an easier and better way to treat this topic: Our scholars have variously stated it as: “The world’s history can be summed as a contest between administrative fiat and the rights of man.”, “The history of the world is the story of the struggle for rule of law as a protection for the rights of men.”, and so forth.
To my knowledge, the earliest recount of this is in The Book of Daniel, telling how certain administrative officers attempted a take-over of the crown.
But, the history of and the reasons for the hundreds of years—and, continuing—migration to this continent are the story of the very same kind and source of persecution in those nations which are to be left behind.
England’s Bloody Assizes upon the pretense of political crimes are an example; the things leading up to—and, throughout—the Spanish Civil war are another.
Up in Portland, one woman who had made a rock garden of ornamental rock, cactus, and wagon-wheel antiques was told by the administrative officer—the inspector—that, her yard was looking just a little too “artsey fartsey”.
Also in Portland, just after the 9/11 Twin Tower plane crashings, an administrative officer was talked about in the Oregonian for telling an immigrant: “Look, I’m G0D to you; you got that? I say whether or not you, . . .”; and of course, the immigrant was constrained to sit and listen to that kind of drivel.
Throughout frozen millennia of time past, there are those whoOkay, but, I think, there’s an easier and better way to treat this topic: Our scholars have variously stated it: “The world’s history can be summed as a contest between administrative fiat and the rights of man.”, “The history of the world is the story of the struggle for rule of law as a protection for the rights of men.”, and so forth.
To my knowledge, the earliest recount of this is in The Book of Daniel, telling how certain administrative officers attempted a take-over of the crown.
But, the history of and the reasons for the hundreds of years—and, continuing—migration to this continent are the story of the very same kind and source of persecution in those nations which are to be left behind.
England’s Bloody Assizes upon the pretense of political crimes are an example; the things leading up to—and, throughout—the Spanish Civil war are another.
Up in Portland, one woman who had made a rock garden of ornamental rock, cactus, and wagon-wheel antiques was told by the administrative officer—the inspector—that, her yard was looking just a little too “artsey fartsey”.
Also in Portland, just after the 9/11 plane crashings, an administrative officer was talked about in the Oregonian for telling an immigrant: “Look, I’m G0D to you; you got that? I say whether or not you, . . .”; and of course, the immigrant was constrained to sit and listen to that kind of drivel.
Throughout frozen millennia of time past, there is the individual who—otherwise lacking in curiosity and inspiration for natural life—perceive the ease of existence in administrative life as a kept man, and he becomes a bureaucrat, worming so many of his family and friends therein, as well, to form a controlling cabal in any administrative organization, converting that organization into a resource, designed for the benefit of those who get paid, and economically—or, it may be physically—squishing the unconnected individuals—whether singly, or in groups.
And, whether of Daniel, or of this nation’s beginnings, or of management of any of our occasional Hitlers and Husseins, or of any other occurrences of administrative evil achieving status in historical remark, surcease and rectification of those instances requires intervention by a higher power because—through the power of the vote—once having surrendered some amount of power, however slight, to overcome administrative evil, the unconnected individual is most unable, . . . And, in their allowance of lying, cheating and stealing, by administrative officers in performance of the daily tasks of their work, our SCOTUS worsens the entire situation, . . . but then, what else could we expect, for, they are drawn from the people, themselves, and who know nothing better, . . .
Mr. Solway’s work here, could mesh well with both the 1st and 2nd editions of “UNMASKING ADMINISTRATIVE EVIL” — 1998 — Adams and Balfour, and with John Dickenson’s 1927 “Administrative Justice and the Supremacy of Law in the United States”, still a Harvard Law School textbook, . . .
