RE #46/vivo: “[...] But again, is somebody going to make an unbiased investigation? Meanwhile, it sounds like smearing. Why can’t people say something only after they have ALL the facts? […}”
vivo, I and countless others would love to have a closer look at the documents in cause and come with a fair and objective review – yet NOTHING IS AVAILABLE! All the documents I mentioned in my post #38 (which are just a few from a longer list), are SIMPLY UNDER LOCK.
Anyone who wanted to examine McCain’s equivalent records had ample opportunity to do so, courtesy to RNC and the McCain campaign – ALL, ALL RECORDS, no exception.
Yet no record concerning Obama’s intriguing career is available, and his group’s attitude in this matter adds to the awkwardness of this situation – so far they have already racked close to $1 million in legal fees, and this strictly for stonewalling! Why did they chose this costly venue when there are much simpler and winsome ways to handle this?
So, no wonder that rumors, frustrations and calls for clarification are growing, and the political costs of this strategy will be soon recognizable.
So, again, am I wrong to use the name of Soetero instead of Obama? Obviously not, the lack of forthcoming of the One who is the object of this justified scrutiny justifies my onomastical choice – and we’ll sure learn more about this.
