A Comment About

Daddy Nobucks: When Involuntary Fathers Are Forced to Foot The Bill

November 14, 2007 - 12:53 am - by Amy Alkon
cubanbob
2007-11-16 00:00:48

KoryO: if a woman does not want to get pregnant she can either get her tubes tied or abstain. Spare me the taxpayers argument. unless your in the top 20% your not a net taxpayer.

Mike L: if a man is supposed to keep it in his pants are you saying a woman should not be held to the same standard by keeping her legs crossed?

A kid is better of being adopted by parents that truly want him or her than being raised by a woman alone who let herself get pregnant by a man who did not volunteer to be daddy.

All too many woman confuse child support with mom support, sixteen years and six hundred thousand dollars later I know than story all to well. And mom earns 45k a year with full benefits. No need for a pity party for her. As a previous commenter put it so well: the woman have all the rights and none of the responsibilities and the men have all the responsibilities and none of the rights.