4. RF: writes
It’s not counterintuitive if you use logic, treat it like a differential equation, the first term goes down the second term goes up. If all potential victim’s had firearms, there would be, theoretically, no crime. Of course if the inverse were true…? Oh yeah, that’s what the lib’s want. Nov 19, 2008 – 3:09 am
=======
Let’s not stop with the math at that point because when just one has a firearm and the will to use it and does on anyone he sees then others might have a slght bleeding promblem.
Now if all the others obayed the law but had fire arms but would only use them to enforce the laws and protect themselfs. This one bad guy has no gun unless he steals it which he likely will.
Then we have let us say 98 armed good people 1 armed bad person and one unarmed good person or did he go by another gun to peplace the stolen gun and now carries rather than keeping it locked up at home?
Now we 99 armed good men and one armed bad man.
Well the fact he likes the easy life I figure he will try and figure out were you live. Wonder who he will pick on now. How many times might revisit your home?
