robotech master: “before you post the same crap that as been debunked.” Uh….what are you talking about, dude? The only thing I’ve seen debunked here is this nonsense that Obama fabricated an identity to take over the United States. Either you don’t know you’re proving that Moran’s thesis of “Obama Derangement Syndrome” or you don’t care.
Misantrhopicus: “you red herrings purveyor: this is legalese. And what Fukino says is JUST that they have Soetero’s original birth certificate, and nothing else.” For one: Who the hell is Soetero? I thought we were talking about Obama. Step outside the conspiracy theory and join us in the real world for a minute.
Fukino actually says this: “Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.” Do you know what “in accordance with state policies and procedures” means??? That it’s legit. That it’s the DEFINITION of legit.
What more do you need?
Also this is funny: “You guys, you keep saying that this discussion is nonsense, that everybody (who’s not on your side) is a loon, etc. etc.”
Everybody who’s not on my side? What side are you talking about? The side that acknowledges that Obama is a natural-born citizen? That’s not a side, dude. This isn’t some kind of political debate.
This is a debate between people who accepts facts, and those who don’t. Obama is an American citizen! He has been his entire life. Why is so hard for you to accept that?
Ms Attitude: “It is important to have a legal document presented as to Obama’s birth.” Yes, it is. And trust me on this one, okay. The guy could not go through life, from school, to a job, to public office, without having that legal document. Perhaps…perhaps a charlatan can slip through 40 some years of car registrations and loan applications and paychecks without that legal document, but it’s very VERY unlikely. So don’t worry about his treaties being “mute,” okay?
Ad finally to Chuck, paranoid without reason, who says: “When we’ve all known for a LONG time that ’state officials’ have been known to lie through their teeth.”
Yes, I suppose it is possible that the “state officials” are indeed lying. They could be “in on it,” so politically warped that a bureaucrat is going to falsify documents, make false statements, and cover up some decades-in-the-making fraud. But before we entertain that suspicion, let’s just assume that the bureacrat is a bureacrat, doing their job, crossing their Ts and dotting their Is. You should try it. You might not hate your country so much.
I love this part, too: “None of them offer any evidence that stands up to the first brush with reality.”
Where’s your evidence, Chucklehead? When presented with official evidence, you say the official is lying. Either you know something you’re not sharing, or you have no idea what you’re talking about! (Put me down for the latter.)
