177. Jeff Weimer wrote:
But you predicate this on the assumption he WASN’T born here – where’s *your* proof? You make the allegation, the burden is on you.
Peter responds: Actually, the allegation is based on a number of so-called facts that have come out (conveniently) after the nomination was in the bag, like Obama’s own grandmother saying she was present for his birth in KENYA. His own book talking of his travels to Pakistan and his childhood in Indonesia when, as the laws existed atthe time, is would have been very, vey diffucukt if not impossible for a US citizen to travel or study in those countries. These are the ‘facts’ that prompt the doubt now surrounding The One. That and the fact he is working so hard, and spending so much money, to hide SOMETHING. We all just want to know what that SOMETHING is?
Jeff also wrote: My child, born in the USA, has a “certificate of live birth”. Based solely on that document, you couldn’t tell if they were “natural born citizens” or not.
Peter responds: And I’m sure if someone questioned your daughter’s citizenship, you would provide that proof in documentation. Or would you spend millions and hire three law firms to keep that info hidden because you feel it’s nobody’s business?
Also at section 1401 for those of you pointing to the “5 years rule, but over 14 and she was 18 so it doesn’t count”, only two of those five years had to be after 14, see (g). This was in effect in 1961. It was actually easier (no age and time restrictions) before noon (EST), May 24, 1934, see (h).
