Hillary Selection Calls Obama’s Respect for the Constitution Into Question
TO: All
RE: Bob Herron v. DCLawyer
I can’t say that I agree with that reading, because it would completely void the Constitution’s text on this point. — DCLawyer
Does DCLawyer resemble a quarterback who hears the sound of pounding feet coming up behind him?
Just a bit ago, I got the distinct impression that he was pooh-poohing the notion that Hillary could become SecState, in spite of the fact that Article 1 Section 6 reads otherwise. And NOW he’s defending the Constitution of the United States against the onslaught of the Obamanation we see unfolding.
RE: Then Again….
I fail to see how conservatives plan on getting back in power by trying to raise niggling legalistic issues rather than taking the issue directly head on. If you think Hillary would make a poor SecState, make the case. — DCLawyer
He/She goes back to the idea that violation of the Constitution of the United States is ‘niggling’.
Is he/she schitzie? Or what color of chalk dust is causing him/her to hop back and forth in double-quick time?
Regards,
Chuck(le)
[A government of laws, and not of men. -- John Adams]
