PJ Media

For an academic, Ms McKenna methodology is extremely flimsy — anecdotes, name calling (“fantasy vouchers”), extrapolation from her personal experience. Sorry for the difficulties with her child, but that is neither here nor there when it comes to arguing for or against the merits of the vouchers. What conclusions can you draw from a sample sized n=1? I can only hope her undergrads are more methodologically rigorous.

Why not do the ultimate thing a scientist (which she claims to be) would do : test your hypothesis? If you are so confident it would fail, there is nothing to fear. Parents would surely recognize it for such and they would clamor for a return to the current state of affairs.

So why not test the hypothesis, Madam Professor?