I heard a clip on a talk show today where a reporter was questioning whether Sarah Palin was too much of a show horse and not enough of a workhorse. It just made me laugh. Too much of a show horse and not enough of a workhorse is a perfect description of Barack Obama, not Sarah Palin. She’s run an entire state with very high approval numbers. She has actual accomplishments, aside from simply getting elected, under her belt. Barack has nothing. What work of note has he ever accomplished? His community organizing, by his own admission, was a failure. His Annenberg Challenge work was, by independent audit, deemed a failure. He served without distinction in the Illinois Senate, voting present when things got too much of a mental strain for him to take a stand. He barely warmed his seat in the United States Senate before taking off to campaign for president. What did he acomplish as a U.S. Senator that will be remembered 50 years from now (or even four)? The man is an empty suit with zero record of accomplishment elected to the highest office in the land and DF has the temerity to question what qualifies Sarah Palin to be vice president. What qualifies Obama to be president? Seriously. Name one thing that shows he has any track record of successful governing or has produced measurable results in any capacity he’s served.
