A Comment About

Obama’s Non-Nuclear World

October 2, 2007 - 2:24 pm - by Richard Fernandez
reliapundit
2007-10-02 20:51:12

richard;

as restrictive gun laws and IAEA/NPT prove, only good guys obey the rules.

believing this polciy might work against the bad guys is idiotically naive:

“We’ll start by seeking a global ban on the production of fissile material for weapons. And we’ll set a goal to expand the U.S.-Russian ban on intermediate-range missiles so that the agreement is global.”

idiocy.

but hey: evryone LOVED neville chamberlain and hated winston.

until 1939.

neville was a well-intentioned disarmament fella like obama.

it’s idiocy.

i know about this: i was raised by FOUNDING MEMBERS of SANE.

i marched with the disarmament crowd in Central Park when reagan deployed the pershings.

REAGAN AND WINSTON WERE RIGHT.

CHAMBERLAIN AND OBAMA ARE WRONG.

would israel be safer with no nukes!?

don’t be so fooooooolish to think so.

maintaining the peace comes through strength.

we should NEVER relinquish our advantage.

during the 2003/4 primary season Dean conjectured that there would come a day when the USA was not the strongest military power in the world.

i shudder to think of what comes next.

Dean was rightly lambasted.

as you and obama are, too.

nukes are not good or bad.

when we have them they are good.

when iran or al qaeda have them they are bad.

end of story.

WAKE UP.