PJ Media

Some folks in DFW have been watching Mr. Elibiardy since he first proclaimed himself a security specialist and backed his coming out with lots of dollars. And believe me, we tried to convince DHS to look at him more closely when they were looking to make him one of their own.

This security specialist specializes in defending his sweethearts in the Holy Land Foundation, his heros Awlaki and Saddam Hussein — when, that is, he can take time out form condemning Judaism and the Zionist entity, the Patriot Act and every other U.S. GWOT policy since 9/11.

Mohamed (aka Hamada) Elibiary also can’t seem to keep his mouth shut or his pen still.

For the enjoyment of PJM, please allow me to share:

“The 9/11 commission’s greatest failure undoubtedly has to be not helping the American people differentiate between our Middle Eastern foreign policy for the past half-century and its blowback.”

[Think about that for a second. 911 was blowback -- a view that is shared, by many. See, e.g, the collected works of Osama Bin Laden.]

[Ironically, the seditious picknose means by 'our' the U.S., not the innocent participants of the global jihad.]

“Al-Awlaki is a one trick pony whose messaging capability was beginning to be cornered by various American and Western Muslim community efforts until this administration overreacted after the Christmas Day bomber tried to blow up a plane over Detroit and inflamed Anwar’s stature many fold. ”

[Awlaki was actually in Yemen, in early 2001, and waging war against the US. Nor did you or his other fans do anything but sing his praises and proclaim his innocence during the last decade.]

[Also, how, pray tell, is it a bloody overreaction for the U.S. to prosecute a trained veteran of the jihad, with PETN on his person, trying to blow up an airliner full of people? Nice explosives, too, rather like those Richard Reid liked to play with, and quite effective at bringing down planes. Basically a practical joke, right? Boy, you are lucky you're not standing here at the moment.]

“While Judaism might have been a divine religion with much good for the world, its marriage with a dogmatic version of the secular nationalist philosophy called Zionism has killed faith and left them with nothing divine at all.”

[Islamic ecumenism?]

[Which is why the Zionist Entity has not right to exist, I imagine. As was taught at Khaybar, if they're not ahl al-kitab, or even if they are, chop chop and give their wives some loving. And don't get Mr. Elibiary started on Christian Zionists, from whom he'd like nothing more than to take their voters registration cards. Dual loyalty, you see. Very dangerous.]

“We as Americans are at a crossroad, because our government is playing a post-9/11 script it played in the 1960s against the Mafia, but this time against a social network it calls the “International Muslim Brotherhood.” People like me know of the brotherhood group in a much more personal manner then the Average White Guy, who has no more insight than what”s available in the media.”

["in a much more personal manner" ... interesting, care to elaborate?]

[Again I note the peculiar use of the first person plural.]

[The MB are really just misunderstood, see? Give them a chance. Look at all the progress they were responsible for in Sudan, Algeria, and our beloved Gaza. And man, what a swell genocide that was in Sudan! What they score? 2.5M?]

[And oh, don't forget how much good the MB do for the youth (keeping them off the streets, and such). Just think how some famous Muslims might have turned out without their influence during their formative periods: Khalid Sheikh Mohamed, e.g., or Osama Bin Laden, or Ramzi Youssef.]

“Mr. al-Zawahiri comes from the “Islamic jihad” school of thought, which split from the parent Muslim Brotherhood decades ago. The brotherhood believes that government should rule by “Shura,” or consultation of the governed. That ideology leaves public opinion, as expressed through elections or other methods, as the great authority on most political issues.”

[The MB is democratic, in that Allah and his self-appointed interpreters get to vote?]

[Americans, in that you want to liked by everyone, please support your local ikhwan.]

“Having first heard this man’s views [Dr Ayman] back in 1998, when a few ragtag mountain jihadis joined forces into a ‘Worldwide Front for Jihad against the Crusaders and the Jews,’ I felt in my gut that something was different in the recent Al-Jazeera broadcast. Since the jihad went online during the last eight years, its strategy has achieved unparalleled clarity.”

[Explain, please. Where were you in 1998? Where was Zawahiri? Are his teeth as yellow as they look on camera? Serious, Lord Haw Haw, you need to explain this. There's not much of a record of you in Dallas in the last years of the millenium.]

[As for those ragtag jihadis, well gosh, in and around 1998 I thought they were in the process of blowing up African civilians and U.S. embassies, and a very beautiful U.S. naval vessel and some of the fine Americans who were aboard her.]

—-

There’s more. Point clear.

This man should NOT be anywhere near secure documents.

If he was shopping them around to sink Perry, he needs to be prosecuted.

One might also wish to see if his colleague Anwar Khalifa had access to any secure documents, as he was recently busted for drugs — though he’s still on Elibiardy’s board of directors.

Those who put Elibiardy in a position to have access to those documents also need to explain themselves.

That this apologist for terror has been allowed to influence U.S. policy is astounding — about as astounding as his kindred spirit, Awlaki, moving in and out of high circles in DC after 911. If the feds can’t differentiate friends from enemies, perhaps they need to ask for help.

And come on, isn’t it time to designate the Brotherhood?

– a professorial patriot from the Lone Star