A Comment About

Dan Rather, OJ and the Culture of the Delusional Celebrity

September 21, 2007 - 4:45 pm - by Roger L Simon
reliapundit
2007-09-21 09:38:12

there used to be a difference between celebrity and notoriety.

the line has become blurred.

and not just in the media, but in the culture as a whole.

the media uses notoriety to break through the clutter – clutter which is the result of the proliferation of media outlets; in the old days – when there were three networks it was easier to reach a large segment of the population.

now, media outlets are more numerous and each reach a smaller and harder to reach segment.

to maximize the size of their audience – and maximize dollars – the media use scandalous stuff.

individuals like rather prove that many people have blurred the line, too.

overall, the sense of shame is disappearing – or should i say the ability to feel ashamed.

this all began in the 1960′s with the counter-culture. and it is the deliberate strategy of the postmodern left.

it is gramscian.

so-called “progressives” are really counter-culture people who want to destroy traditional culture and replace it with a PC state run by an socialist elite.

oj and rather are therefore to side of the gramscian coin:

oj – a notorious criminal exploited by the msm.

rather: a fool who no longer can feel shame.