Goldman’s body was found in a sitting position against a tree stump, a knife wound in his back puncturing the artery in his chest cavity. But only about a half cup or so of blood had collected in the chest cavity, meaning that that wound was delivered post-mortem. Did Simpson lift up the body and stab after Goldman had bled to death from another wound? Did he wait for ten minutes for Goldman to bleed out?
There was no aspiration (inhalation) of blood in Nicole Simpson’s body. There was no blood in her mouth or her sinuses, even though the massive cut bissected the epiglottis. That is, not even the flesh in her head was bleeding when the throat slash was made. She was neither breathing nor bleeding.
Both victims had died and their bodies bled out when additional wounds were added to their bodies. Does anyone have a theory why Simpson would stand around a crime scene in downtown LA for ten minutes to wait for two victims to stop moving, bleed out and be stone dead and THEN add meaningless wounds? To make it look like a crime of passion?
Fake crime scene, fake reporting, false propaganda: the basis for a political credo.
While cogitating on the autopsy evidence, go back and read Barry Scheck’s summary at the end of the trial. If you really want to hate Simpson, his restatement of the evidence should make you angry–at the false prosecution you allowed yourself to believe.
