The point of the above hypothetical conversation, of course, is to show that it is NEVER “ok” to attack our system of government by means of plotting to overthrow it.
If Senator Obama becomes our Commander in Chief, he is duty bound to protect ALL our citizens, but also our way of life. That flag that felt like the “wrong” kind of patriotism, is the same flag that he becomes the standard bearer of and for.
His “social circle” in Hyde Park may not give Ayers and Dohrn a second glance, in fact, in the wine and brie set, they may approach Bonnie and Clyde romanticized, tres chic radical status. You “prove” your liberal bona fides by being “accepting” of them…even defending them. Our Commander in Chief has no room for such elegant dissembling. An anarchist with a history of violence, is not the Great Gatsby when your butt hits the chair in the Oval Office.
By occupying that seat, the holder of the office makes an express and implied promise to serve as protector against the very likes of Frank Marshall Davis, William Ayers, Michael Klonsky, Carl Davidson, if one believes that the imposition of an ideology that intends to overthrow our system of government is indeed a threat.
With two weeks left before the election, the entrenched media has never asked the question. There must surely be a reason why.
Perhaps we must ask a preliminary question first. Is it fair to ask Senator Obama if he believes that Ayers ideology as an anarchist/small “c” communist would pose a threat to our way of life, if it took hold? Would he fight against it?
Does he believe that Frank Marshall Davis’ CPUSA leanings would pose a threat to the government if they took hold? Would he fight against that?
Does he believe that Michael Klonsky’s New Party “fusion”, Maoism, and extreme radicalism would pose a threat to the government if it took hold? And would he fight against that?
Does Senator Obama believe that James Cone’s Marxist inspired theopolitics promotes an ideology that is antithetical to our system of government? Would he fight against it?
While we are on the subject of things that Senator Obama will NEVER be asked, what does he believe the common ground is, in the beliefs and policy directions of Zbigniew Brzezinski, Robert Malley, Samantha Power, Tony McPeak, Dick Lugar, James Jones, Susan Rice, Anthony Lake are? What ONE thing, do they all have in common? (that they also have in common with Jimmy Carter, Pat Buchanan and James Baker)
Does that one thing signal anything about your intentions as President?
If you are elected President, you are entitled to the full support of every citizen of this country. Unlike President Bush, you are more likely to afforded such by the vast majority of the people. But, it sure would have been nice going in…to not have the corrupt media in your pocket keeping important questions from being asked of you. It might have helped you be much more ready…if you had been allowed to ponder a point of view that didn’t originate in an echo chamber. I wish you well, no matter if you win or lose. I will support you fully if you win. I just don’t like how the game has been played.
