sorry if i offend, but my point remains that Spencer cannot claim that xianity is somehow more “a religion of peace” than Islam.
that is unquantifiable.
He also cannot claim superior cultural legacy of science and reason. Other cultures contributed equally.
I am writing a paper on apophasis…xians burned margarete porete, muslims crufified my beloved Hallaj.
Also Spencer cannot claim an understanding of the Qu’ran, Koran, Qur’an w/e…arabic is an oral tradition languange with triple consonants…spelling is various. Meaning in classical arabic is dependent on both inflection and context. that is one reason there can be conflicting interpretations.
Spencer has admitted to me that he no quranic exegesis of his own.
He is giving you regugitated jihaadi exegesis. duh, of course jihaadi islam is violent. He is NOT an islamic scholar. He is not trained….he is a homeschooler if you please.
Spencer insists on a literalist interprentation and ignores any parts that contradict him and the jihaadis, like muslims cannot kill muslims, and he who takes the life of an innocent is killing the whole world.
benson sez–The topic here was the debate between an author and a reviewer.
so….that means no one else can comment?
and!
ima grrl.
c yah.
