A Comment About

Derbyshire v Spencer, The Final Round

August 28, 2007 - 1:00 am - by Robert Spencer
matoko kusanagi
2007-08-30 10:14:06

i have asked for debate and rebuttals…..none are forthcoming.
Lets commence a bit of fisking, shall we?
“The whole point of my book is that Judeo-Christian civilization stands for values that are more humane and life-affirming than those of Islamic Sharia.”
we also live under sharia. sharia is codified mores, social taboos, and religious values. Both sharia’s incorporate taboos against incest, murder, robbery. Exactly which sharia laws are you objecting to, Roobart? the ones that don’t allow ignorant homeschoolers to debate legitimate quranic scholars? lol.

“values” is purely subjective–jews crucified Jesus, xians burned Margarete Porete, muslims crucified Ibn Hallaj. all mystics…the similiarities are intriguing.
i denounce your subjective argument.
who decides which “values” are more “humane and life-affirming”? You have aready demonstrated that you are incapable of unbiased empiricism in your promotion of jihaadi exegesis as the only valid interpretation of the Qu’ran.