First voter registration fraud makes actual voter fraud easier. The point is: FRAUD IS FRAUD. Or have Dems still not learned what the meaning of “is” is?
Didn’t Hillary also win the popular vote in the primary?
Thanks for the no conviction = Ayers not guilty theme. Dispite the fact that the only reason he was not convicted was prosecutorial misconduct and illegal (inadmissable) wiretaps and the fact the he admits it, he is still not guilty. By that logic a klansman that killed a black person and admitted it but was found not guilty by a bunch of racist whites also really did not do it after all. I mean he wasn’t convicted so it must not have ever happened.
I also find it humerous that people keep finding CLOSE associates of Obama have shady pasts but the best you can come up with for a defense is either Keating 5 which he was found not guilty of (which is really funny since McCain was exhonerated and Ayers was not, yet McCain is guilty but Ayers is not) or some remote thing McCain did like speak at a meeting or as above that a supporter of his also had ties to Ayers.
There is a BIG difference between a supporter of McCain also supporting Ayers, and Obama himself having close ties to Acorn and Ayers.
Obama was a member of a far left leaning socialist branch of Dems (new party I think) and nothing is said, but dear lord don’t mention Palin spoke at a meeting of a Alaskan speratist party and she is a full blown member.
Again please note, there is a difference between haveing spoken at a meeting once or twice and being a full blown member. Same with those who support you, someone who just now is supporting you who has a questionable past is not the same thing as a person who has close ties to that person with a questionable past for many years.
