Check out this timely story the BBC was kind enough to publish, today:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-14265952
In 2009 a US Army major serving at the Fort Hood military base in Texas opened fire on fellow soldiers, killing 13 people and injuring many more. It is not clear what motivated the attacker but some reports said the gunman, a US-born Muslim, was unhappy about being sent to Iraq or Afghanistan.
Really? It’s not clear? And by “some reports”, is the BBC referring to its own painfully politically-correct articles, by any chance? Because, I honestly doubt I could find anyone here in the United States who believes this terrorist son of a bitch went on his rampage because he was “unhappy” abut being sent to Afghanistan or Iraq. And note how this little section was tacked onto an article about a husband killing his wife and other family members during some kind of domestic dispute, as if they are somehow related? Maybe the jihadi was just upset about his girlfriend breaking up with him or something? It’s potentially possible, isn’t it?
And yet, right next to this article on the BBC website they have several where they express no such doubt about what happened in Norway just *yesterday*.
