Screw the Bradley effect. Obama’s problems are of his own creation. People on the left and right are forced to project virtues or vices onto him because he hasn’t accomplished a damn thing in his life except advance the cause that is Obama.
Is he corrupt? – we don’t know. He certainly hasn’t been shy about benefitting from those who are though.
Is he a far leftist? – we don’t know. He certainly has a background which is full of intimate associations with those who are though. And he isn’t honest about it.
Is he a narcissist? – This one is not even arguable. Yes.
Is he a capable leader? – we don’t know. He hasn’t accomplished anything legislatively. Certainly hasn’t led any fights for anything or broken with his party, ever.
Is he an open book? – clearly he is not. I have a million questions about him still, after all his time in the public spotlight, and the mainstream media refuses to do their due dilligence and put him under the microscope as they do with other candidates.
The problem is that there are only two things you can reasonably take away from Obama’s history. That he has gone to great pains to conceal just how radical his beliefs are or that he really is fairly mainstream left and benign but doesn’t believe in anything enough to fight, has been fairly incompetent to effect change when he’s had the opportunity to do so, lacks the backbone to chasten the scumbaggy people he has been surrounded by and is basically a wet noodle who talks a good game and little else.
