Simplicity and intellectuals are mutually excluded in any conversation, discourse, or other intellectual pursuit. However, when one takes away the practiced language of an intellectual and asks him or her to explain their thoughts and theories in a lineal, straight thread manner, they are incapable. Their minds do not work nor are they capable of direct truth. They must cloak every unproven theory in a rambling and unconnected discourse or in the case of C, a diatribe against his own country.
Chomsky must use his deceptive language in order to justify his hypocrisy and willingness to “bite the hand that feeds him.” It is a basic requirement in Industrial Engineering to use the minimum number of words that create the least amount of confusion when presenting a new system, idea, process, or other endeavor so the end user can clearly and plainly understand what the actual point or purpose is of the new system.
Intellectuals find the practice of practical language an anathema to their very existence since it would force them to speak the “plain truth” and their elitist mentality will not allow them to “let the vast unwashed and uneducated” in the club. When the average “Joe or Jane” must constantly refer to the dictionary in order to understand the point the writer is trying to convey. When an author or writer make a sentence difficult to diagram and understand, it is not done out of any actual intent to improve or enhance humanity, it is to put on display their own linguistic agility and their extensive knowledge of obscure words that would never be used by most people possessing average or slightly above average intelligence.
I find there is a stronger than or above average connection between the Chomsky and Obama syntax they use when trying to convey a point. They are both successful liars and cheats who are conscious of the deception they practice with the use of cleverly cloaked words usually meant for obscure references. Their most ardent supporters will put on a mask of pretense and believe they actually understand the garbled theories these people put forth.
After reading Obama’s first book, it was a revelation into the soul of the man and the soul of Obama is not one who holds this country in high esteem nor does he have a connection that would be conducive to developing a deep love of country, America. He is truly a man without a country, same as Chomsky, of their own choosing. All you need do is read the words they use.
