A Comment About

Deconstructing Chomsky

May 21, 2011 - 12:55 am - by David Solway
The Root '83
2011-05-21 20:34:02

ETAB,

‘All mimsy were the borogroves and the mome raths outgrabe’”

‘mimsy’ is obviously a descriptive adjective”

Could it not also be a plural noun?
Replacing the variables with:

“All women were the targets, and the Mohamadans ran outside?

Could it not also be a verb?
Replacing the variables with:

All decelerations were the opposite, and the launch was canceled.

Rules cannot define the meanings of words.
If a pair of cavemen understood the meaning of just these three words:
“kill”, “food” and “cold” they would have no problem understanding what the other meant when seeing a deer and saying EITHER;

Food….kill

or

Kill….food

But the combinations “kill…cold” and “cold…food” would probably be confusing. Staring at a snuffed out campfire, or tugging on the fur of some carrion left by a lion, while saying “cold…cold”" would make sense. Re-start that fire, wear that fur, I’m freaking cold.

Without words having agreed upon meanings, its difficult to have any “grammar” or “rules” build better sentences and ideas.

The Spanish “Going to the house of John” vs the English “going to John’s house”

Once you understand the possessive meaning of “John’s” you can understand that all this crap is his: John’s house, John’s Car, Johns porn collection and…

John’s huge bonfire of all the Noam Chomsky books ever published.

It seems Chomsky, like all unnecessary Leftists, has made a living out of re-inventing the wheel, with square edges and flat planes, and is thought of as genius for daring to do so.

That the wagon simply wont GO doesnt enter their minds.
Recognizing and rewarding the brilliance of such abstract thought is the career goal among all such “non-pullers”