A Comment About

Deconstructing Chomsky

May 21, 2011 - 12:55 am - by David Solway
PAthena
2011-05-21 12:58:06

Noam Chomsky is a would-be tyrant, which is why he supports tyranny everywhere and opposes democracy and the rule of law. He was a tyrant in his academic field, having his acolytes destroy those who disagreed with him. Nils Yngve at MIT had a group supported by grants from the Navy to work out machine-translation. He gave Chomsky a job which led to his later career at MIT. When, after twenty years, Yngve applied to become a faculty member at MIT, Chomsky led the attack to prevent this – some gratitude. Incidentally, Chomsky never got a Ph.D., and I do not think that he knew many languages apart from English and Hebrew.
Chomsky wrote a book, CARTESIAN LINGUISTICS, to prove that he was the successor to Descartes. Only Descartes did not have a theory of linguistics.