Condi’s Legacy: Nuclear Fool for Saudi Arabia

June 9, 2008 - 10:33 pm - by Claudia Rosett

Last month, when Condi Rice signed a memorandum of understanding with the Saudi foreign minister saying that America would help Saudi Arabia develop a nuclear program, I noted 15 reasons why this was a bad idea. In today’s Wall Street Journal, Rep. Ed Markey lists some more. In case you haven’t seen the MOU, here’s a copy, complete with a statement about addressing “the growing energy needs” in both countries, and the intention of America “to ensure reliable fuel supply for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia” — nuclear fuel that is (assuming there’s room to cram it in between oil wells).

The MOU is signed by Saudi Foreign Minister Saud Al Faisal Bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud, who along with Condi assures us that this is all leading to “development of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s civilian nuclear energy use in a manner that contributes to global efforts to prevent nuclear proliferation.” He’s the same foreign minister who in this 2003 article translated by MEMRI (scroll down to June 23rd) assured us that now that Saudi Arabia has controls on its charities, “the possibility of these money (sic) reaching any illegal organization is non-existent.” (Good to know).

There are also provisions in the MOU for “exchange of scientific and technical information and documentation” and “exchange and training of personnel.” We can thank Condi, then, when Saudi nuclear experts visit our shores to share their expertise and impart the results of their skills?

PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.

3 Comments, 3 Threads, 1 Trackbacks

1. Bill Bradley

.

June 10, 2008 - 6:41 am Link to this Comment | Reply
2. Ron Kean

I’m voting for McCain and I expect to be called a racist.

I’d vote for Clarence Thomas, Alan Keyes, Thomas Sewell, or Bill Cosby for anything.

I wouldn’t vote for Colin Powell, Barry Obama, or C. Rice for anything.

I received something in the mail from ‘Citizens Against Government Waste’ asking me to sign a petition to reduce expenditures to the UN. It says the US pays $12.8 billion or 25% of the budget. I wonder if it will be worth the postage to send the petition back.

Why the heck doesn’t somebody make Saudi Arabia and the rest buck up.

June 10, 2008 - 8:59 pm Link to this Comment | Reply
3. OmegaPaladin

There are good reasons for Saudi Arabia to have a nuclear energy program. Cheap steam for desalinating water, for example. Plus, all the oil the burn they cannot sell on the market.

I really don’t see a good reason to provide them with help, unless the Russians and Chinese were also trying to sign them up.

June 13, 2008 - 3:05 pm Link to this Comment | Reply