uh, if you really love that “someone”, then you don’t condamn this “person”, but try to understand why there’s such a bad behaviour, may-be it’s because you haven’t explained rightfully your true goals, which were difficultly understandable from our different perspective.

In any case, if you don’t caress the “beast” in the sense of its hair, and if you shout at it too, this entity beast is most likely enclined to tell you go f… yourself !

Bush jr hasn’t understood french psychology, he thought we ought to follow the herd, like the Brits, the Dutchs, the Poles… which were/are US satellits, logic’s ones for the Brits and the Dutchs… they didn’t need explanations, or were given some because of the language facilities, and their leaders personnalities.

None in the Bush administration made the decision to travel to Paris, to talk to our responsables, they found sufficient to whistle us, come here good dog, you owe me a service !

This was a deplorable no-attempt to convince a country that didn’t find the war justified in the first place.

Remember how many travels Churchill made to the US to decide Roosevelt to get involved in the european conflict, and UK was still that powerful empire at this time though.

Bush father had a better approach of the international relations and diplomaty, he convinced Mitterrand, a socialist, of the rightfulness of the “desert storm”, though we had not more motives to get there at this time than in 2003, Koweit wasn’t under our influence sphere.

So this insane quarrel between our countries came mostly because your people were too in hurry to show their Popeye arms, and that that we need more human relations from your administration to decide that we should assist you too.