oliviaann@gmail.com wrote:

This article is full of inaccuracies, assumptions, and flat out poor journalism.

I’m wide open to that possibility, but I’d like to see something more than an argument by assertion

I’d also like to see how any errors negate the overall point she’s made.

Until then, I’ll continue to believe that this investigation is worthy of a Pulitzer Prize, though — outrageously — it won’t happen. Claudia’s been there, done that, bought the t-shirt — with the Oil for Food scandal.

Still, the present report might prompt further investigative reports by others. But I doubt it (color me cynical).

Brian