The CPA was eventually repalced by an iraqi government. What would be the alternative if we disbanded the UN tomorrow? How would global health, education, law of the seas, peace keepingmissions, treaties, and other issues etc be managed?

1. How were they managed before the UN? And who mentioned “disbanding” it—unless you’re admitting that the UN is worthless without U.S. welfare payments.

2. Why is a profoundly corrupt organization (heroically documented by Claudia Rosett), that has also enabled pedophiles, rapine, thuggery and even genocide, the only way to define and deal with planetary needs?

3. Assuming (for the sake of argument) that the world can’t get along without this terminally unctuous body, why can’t it demonstrate its usefulness without the hated “superpower” which the cunning incompetents and satraps love to beat up on?

4. When catastrophes happen, like the Tsunami, everybody expects the U.S. to do the heavy lifting anyway. The U.S. obliges. Then a UN Kofi shows up for foto Ops and to deliver UN “blessing,” as the globalistas and media fawn. Thanks, but maybe no thanks.

5.Summary. Don’t disband it. Let’s have a great experiment. Let’s see how it works without the hated Superpower. Let it desert the New York fleshpots. Ensconce it in “friendlier” turf, like Brussels. Or what about Beijing—as a way to coax the Chinese into fuller participation and developing their “leadership” skills in world affairs, as befits an emerging great power and super trader? This would surely be relief for the world’s anti-Americans, no? But not to worry.The US could be a “well-meaning observer.” Of course, when the next calamity happens–as it always will—you know who the anti-Americanos will still come running to, right?