<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Click Here for Central Planning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/claudiarosett/click-here-for-central-planning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/claudiarosett/click-here-for-central-planning/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:35:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/claudiarosett/click-here-for-central-planning/#comment-4021</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/?p=961#comment-4021</guid>
		<description>Notice the timeline on recovery.gov - March 3, 2009 - &quot;federal agencies begin reporting use of funds&quot;.  That ought to be interesting.  Maybe Arne Duncan will get the Dept of Education some more of those $2,000 coffee pots he bought for the Chicago school system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice the timeline on recovery.gov &#8211; March 3, 2009 &#8211; &#8220;federal agencies begin reporting use of funds&#8221;.  That ought to be interesting.  Maybe Arne Duncan will get the Dept of Education some more of those $2,000 coffee pots he bought for the Chicago school system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moogie</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/claudiarosett/click-here-for-central-planning/#comment-4020</link>
		<dc:creator>Moogie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/?p=961#comment-4020</guid>
		<description>I am actually fairly curious about recovery.gov, but I&#039;m afraid to go to their site. My computer might leave a cookie trail behind, then they&#039;ll know who I am, and they&#039;ll know that I recently started a new job, and they&#039;ll use my meager little statistic as &quot;proof&quot; of a job saved or created.

11B40: &quot;Disjunction&quot; - absolutely brilliant. &quot;Saved or created&quot; ... it almost sounds like a double negative, doesn&#039;t it? I think it must be a term straight from the Saul Alinsky School of Oxymoronic Speech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am actually fairly curious about recovery.gov, but I&#8217;m afraid to go to their site. My computer might leave a cookie trail behind, then they&#8217;ll know who I am, and they&#8217;ll know that I recently started a new job, and they&#8217;ll use my meager little statistic as &#8220;proof&#8221; of a job saved or created.</p>
<p>11B40: &#8220;Disjunction&#8221; &#8211; absolutely brilliant. &#8220;Saved or created&#8221; &#8230; it almost sounds like a double negative, doesn&#8217;t it? I think it must be a term straight from the Saul Alinsky School of Oxymoronic Speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TennesseeVolunteer</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/claudiarosett/click-here-for-central-planning/#comment-4019</link>
		<dc:creator>TennesseeVolunteer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/?p=961#comment-4019</guid>
		<description>Whenever you read a general statement that you question, you have to go to the specifics listed and check them out one by one.  truthfulness by the Obama administration is never in the specifics:
- 95 % tax cut
- 3 Million jobs created
- 3 million jobs created/saved
- 3.5 M jobs created/saved
- 4M jobs created/saved
- get out of Iraq in 16 months
- close gitmo in 12 months
- no rendition
- we&#039;re keeping rendition
- I like Pepperoni
- I hate Pepperoni
- we need to spend,stimulus is spending
- there are no earmarks?
Get the idea?  this guy and his administration are so accustomed to not being questioned, they think they can cite any fact or number and no one will keep up with it.  Over time, they will look, and be, the biggest liars in the history of politics!  They are so impressed with themselves, and their sycophants, that they don&#039;t know they don&#039;t have any clothes on!
Whenever they speak, look at their specifics.  If they were selling real estate or life insurance, they would be jailed.  buy this life insurance and you&#039;ll make millions!  
If they worked for any of us citing these nebulous numbers, we&#039;d fire them in days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever you read a general statement that you question, you have to go to the specifics listed and check them out one by one.  truthfulness by the Obama administration is never in the specifics:<br />
- 95 % tax cut<br />
- 3 Million jobs created<br />
- 3 million jobs created/saved<br />
- 3.5 M jobs created/saved<br />
- 4M jobs created/saved<br />
- get out of Iraq in 16 months<br />
- close gitmo in 12 months<br />
- no rendition<br />
- we&#8217;re keeping rendition<br />
- I like Pepperoni<br />
- I hate Pepperoni<br />
- we need to spend,stimulus is spending<br />
- there are no earmarks?<br />
Get the idea?  this guy and his administration are so accustomed to not being questioned, they think they can cite any fact or number and no one will keep up with it.  Over time, they will look, and be, the biggest liars in the history of politics!  They are so impressed with themselves, and their sycophants, that they don&#8217;t know they don&#8217;t have any clothes on!<br />
Whenever they speak, look at their specifics.  If they were selling real estate or life insurance, they would be jailed.  buy this life insurance and you&#8217;ll make millions!<br />
If they worked for any of us citing these nebulous numbers, we&#8217;d fire them in days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/claudiarosett/click-here-for-central-planning/#comment-4018</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/?p=961#comment-4018</guid>
		<description>Palin-Santarelli 2012</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palin-Santarelli 2012</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lester tobias</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/claudiarosett/click-here-for-central-planning/#comment-4015</link>
		<dc:creator>lester tobias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/?p=961#comment-4015</guid>
		<description>I have been watching recovery.gov for a while now, and it is one of the most depressing websites ever.  It is not transparent, it is not interactive, it is not helpful in the least.  It is the closest thing to an Orwellian pablum that any administration has ever doled out.  There is no useful info.   For example, I wanted to know who the players were at yesterday&#039;s &quot;Stimulus Focus Group&quot;.  There wasn&#039;t even an announcement (yes, they have an &quot;announcement&quot; menu) that the President was holding a &quot;focus group&quot;.  Now don&#039;t you think a truly transparent administration would tell you which 20 or 30 people were going to come up with this one day solution to economic crisis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been watching recovery.gov for a while now, and it is one of the most depressing websites ever.  It is not transparent, it is not interactive, it is not helpful in the least.  It is the closest thing to an Orwellian pablum that any administration has ever doled out.  There is no useful info.   For example, I wanted to know who the players were at yesterday&#8217;s &#8220;Stimulus Focus Group&#8221;.  There wasn&#8217;t even an announcement (yes, they have an &#8220;announcement&#8221; menu) that the President was holding a &#8220;focus group&#8221;.  Now don&#8217;t you think a truly transparent administration would tell you which 20 or 30 people were going to come up with this one day solution to economic crisis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PunditKix</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/claudiarosett/click-here-for-central-planning/#comment-4014</link>
		<dc:creator>PunditKix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/?p=961#comment-4014</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Rosett Report  » Click Here for Central Planning - Recovery.gov...&lt;/strong&gt;

Trackback from PunditKix.com...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Rosett Report  » Click Here for Central Planning &#8211; Recovery.gov&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Trackback from PunditKix.com&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grace</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/claudiarosett/click-here-for-central-planning/#comment-4009</link>
		<dc:creator>Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/?p=961#comment-4009</guid>
		<description>Hi Claudia, 
I&#039;d like to know what you think of the 
Rick Santarelli CNBC &quot;Chicago Tea Party&quot; plans.
Grace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Claudia,<br />
I&#8217;d like to know what you think of the<br />
Rick Santarelli CNBC &#8220;Chicago Tea Party&#8221; plans.<br />
Grace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steynian 327 &#171; Free Canuckistan!</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/claudiarosett/click-here-for-central-planning/#comment-4007</link>
		<dc:creator>Steynian 327 &#171; Free Canuckistan!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/?p=961#comment-4007</guid>
		<description>[...] CENTRAL PLANNING: &#8220;OK, all you Americans still clinging to your guns, religion, and failed ideas of the past [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CENTRAL PLANNING: &#8220;OK, all you Americans still clinging to your guns, religion, and failed ideas of the past [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bilgeman</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/claudiarosett/click-here-for-central-planning/#comment-4004</link>
		<dc:creator>Bilgeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 04:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/?p=961#comment-4004</guid>
		<description>#15 jcrue:
&quot;For Bilgeman: I have just the item for you&quot;

 Thanks, man. That was funny right up until early November, when lemming-like, the electorate decided to dive right in.

 Sadly, they&#039;re dragging me in, too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#15 jcrue:<br />
&#8220;For Bilgeman: I have just the item for you&#8221;</p>
<p> Thanks, man. That was funny right up until early November, when lemming-like, the electorate decided to dive right in.</p>
<p> Sadly, they&#8217;re dragging me in, too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cedarford</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/claudiarosett/click-here-for-central-planning/#comment-4002</link>
		<dc:creator>cedarford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/?p=961#comment-4002</guid>
		<description>This is not good. SF Democrats in charge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not good. SF Democrats in charge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

