The Rosett Report

By Claudia Rosett

Bio

Get Updates From Claudia Rosett

As if there isn’t crisis enough in the Middle East, we’ve had Kofi Annan romping around the region for the past week, condemning-Israel-as-usual and assuring us from Damascus that Syria’s regime will keep an eye on Hezbollah (no doubt). Now, having arrived in Tehran, Annan –due to meet tomorrow with President Mahmoud “Mushroom Cloud” Ahmadinejad — has announced that his talks with Iranian officials so far have been “very good and constructive

Where have we heard that before? Recall Annan’s February, 1998 dash to Baghdad, whence he returned to tell the press: “Can I trust Saddam Hussein? I think I can do business with him.”

In that case, Annan’s triumph was supposed to be that he had persuaded UN-sanctioned Saddam to let UN weapons inspectors stay in Iraq. That worked for all of about nine months, at the end of which Saddam in December, 1998 kicked out the weapons inspectors for four solid years — during which Saddam’s regime with the knowledge and complicity of the UN scammed and smuggled for itself close to $17 billion meant for Iraqi relief under the UN’s Oil-for-Food program (which was the main vehicle for Saddam under UN sanctions to rack up at least $21 billion in illicit revenues). Annan’s Secretariat collected close to $1.9 billion in commissions for administering this world-record scam — including $500 million for weapons inspections, even though from late 1998 until late 2002 there were no weapons inspections.

And now — stay tuned for Annan’s UN deal-in-the-works on Iran, where chief nuclear negotiator for the ayatollahs, Ali Larijani, Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, told the press after meeting Saturday with Annan: “We need to have continuous consultations with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.”

PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.

2 Comments, 2 Threads

  1. We’ve heard the script throughout the 1930′s – Chamberlain’s ghost has returned. Annan’s pronouncements are pure Alice in Wonderland but that’s the raison d’etre of the UN.

  2. 2. Alex Reed

    You bet Kofi can do business with Iran! They are working out the details of his retirement package as we speak.
    Certainly, having the hero of Rwanda, Darfur, and countless other tragedies flitting around the Middle East can only produce further disasters.
    What I find most disturbing in this entire situation, however, is the fact that our own State Department and its de facto chief, Nick Burns, have themselves put the UN in the catbird seat by signing off on 1701. Is there no one left in the White House with a brain and a will of their own (or a plan)? All I see is a total abdication of leadership to the State Department ninnies.

Leave a Reply

Click here to subscribe to the Daily Digest, to stay up to date with the latest at PJ Media. (You will be sent an email asking you to verify your email address. If you have previously subscribed, no verification email will be sent.)