The Rosett Report

By Claudia Rosett

Bio

Get Updates From Claudia Rosett

If President Obama really wants to reach out to Muslim world, here’s something he should look for ways to reach out and stop cold: Yet another round of Holocaust denial, from Iran’s Holocaust-denier-in-chief, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Now running for re-anointment (as my colleague Michael Ledeen points out, “re-election” isn’t really a word that applies), Ahmadinejad repeated on Wednesday his claim that the Holocaust was a “big deception.”

This is quite horrible enough, coming from a strutting, messianic, nuclear-obsessed despot belonging to a regime that would like to blot out Israel.

But Elie Wiesel – a Nobel laureate and a survivor of the Holocaust in which six million Jews were murdered – offers a theory even more chilling about why Ahmadinejad, while setting the stage for a second Holocaust, finds it so compelling to keep denying that there ever was one. Speaking at a Hudson Institute luncheon in New York on April 30th, Wiesel offered his view that Ahmadinejad is after his own monstrous version of personal glory:

Wiesel said his guess is that Ahmadinejad “wants to enter the history books as the only one who destroyed the Jews.”

Ergo — according to Wiesel’s theory – in Ahmadinejad’s scheme of the universe, there is no room to admit that Hitler already set the bar.

Wiesel went on to warn that there is a chronic tendency to think such things could never happen, to believe that fanatics such as Ahmadnejad, or his patron Ayatollah Khamenei, don’t really mean what they say. Wake up, says Wiesel:  Ahmadinejad “is clear. He means it.”

PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.

5 Comments, 5 Threads, 4 Trackbacks

  1. 1. Brian

    Claudia wrote:

    Wiesel went on to warn that there is a chronic tendency to think such things could never happen, to believe that fanatics such as Ahmadnejad, or his patron Ayatollah Khamenei, don’t really mean what they say.

    I’m profoundly sorry that I can’t remember the proper attribution, but there is an all-too-human thought process that, a wiser person than I, suggested approximates this:

    It has not happened in my experience, which is proof that it cannot and will not happen in the future.

  2. 2. Alex

    Claudia, in regard to your latest article on Obama in Forbes,
    there are at least two points that you are factually wrong on:
    1. Putin is no longer the Prime Minister, he hasn’t been for a long while now and
    2. There’s no way to prevent a terrorist plan from being hatched; there
    is a way however, to prevent it from being implemented and the major part (the one that mattered) of it’s hands-on planning and implementation did not happen during Clinton’s time.

    You lost a lot credibility with the article in question.

    [Ed. note: Alex, Putin hasn't been president for a while, but unless you know something the rest of us don't, he's still the prime minister.]

  3. 3. Alex

    Oh yes, my bad, I forgot they have it the other way around in Russia.

    Cheers!

  4. 4. Jan

    And yet Wiesel gives Obama credibility by appearing with him at Buchenwald and suggesting that he, Obama, can make a positive difference in this world.

    Mr. Wiesel, what could you be thinking. Obama ignores the madman from Iran’s ranting.

  5. 5. Danny

    I think it is a simpler reason. Basically it is a result of their narrative for the reason Israel exists:

    1) West is overcome with remorse at not having saved the Jews in the second world war,
    2) As such they “give” “Palestine” to Israel.

    Now if it turns out Jews weren’t really killed then there is nothing to feel bad about and so you can “give” “Palestine” back.

    NB none of the 2 pillars are true but this is the standard narrative.

Leave a Reply

Click here to subscribe to the Daily Digest, to stay up to date with the latest at PJ Media. (You will be sent an email asking you to verify your email address. If you have previously subscribed, no verification email will be sent.)