<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If Ahmadinejad Wants the UN, Let Him Have It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/claudiarosett/ahmadinejad_in_the_un_armchair/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/claudiarosett/ahmadinejad_in_the_un_armchair/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:35:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Rosett Report &#187; If Ahmadinejad Loves the UN So Much, Just Keep Him There</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/claudiarosett/ahmadinejad_in_the_un_armchair/#comment-25838</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rosett Report &#187; If Ahmadinejad Loves the UN So Much, Just Keep Him There</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 07:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/2006/09/20/if-ahmadinejad-wants-the-un-let-him-have-it/#comment-25838</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pst314</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/claudiarosett/ahmadinejad_in_the_un_armchair/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>pst314</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 18:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/2006/09/20/if-ahmadinejad-wants-the-un-let-him-have-it/#comment-97</guid>
		<description>&quot;If you are chasing &#039;ladies of easy virtue&#039; - oh wait, there aren&#039;t any of those.&quot;

Actually, there are quite a few in Iran. And the mullahs are up to their eyeballs in protection rackets.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you are chasing &#8216;ladies of easy virtue&#8217; &#8211; oh wait, there aren&#8217;t any of those.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, there are quite a few in Iran. And the mullahs are up to their eyeballs in protection rackets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Grey - Liberty Dad</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/claudiarosett/ahmadinejad_in_the_un_armchair/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Grey - Liberty Dad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 00:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/2006/09/20/if-ahmadinejad-wants-the-un-let-him-have-it/#comment-96</guid>
		<description>The USA should contribute no more to the UN than the least contributor (China?) on the UNSC.

But the world needs a World Cop.

The USA, plus the UK and Japan, and (second most important) INDIA, should form a new organization.

The Human Rights Enforcement Group, whose primary purpose is to enforce two human rights, free speech, and free religion, and to stop mass murder by the gov&#039;t (genocide or otherwise).  It should ONLY be democracies.

Enforcement actions would require coalitions, but only of the willing, and only if the HReg org declared a country&#039;s gov&#039;t in gross violation of Human Rights.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The USA should contribute no more to the UN than the least contributor (China?) on the UNSC.</p>
<p>But the world needs a World Cop.</p>
<p>The USA, plus the UK and Japan, and (second most important) INDIA, should form a new organization.</p>
<p>The Human Rights Enforcement Group, whose primary purpose is to enforce two human rights, free speech, and free religion, and to stop mass murder by the gov&#8217;t (genocide or otherwise).  It should ONLY be democracies.</p>
<p>Enforcement actions would require coalitions, but only of the willing, and only if the HReg org declared a country&#8217;s gov&#8217;t in gross violation of Human Rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seymour Paine</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/claudiarosett/ahmadinejad_in_the_un_armchair/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Seymour Paine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 21:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/2006/09/20/if-ahmadinejad-wants-the-un-let-him-have-it/#comment-95</guid>
		<description>tehran or some place in Africa, like, uh, Dar es Salaam.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tehran or some place in Africa, like, uh, Dar es Salaam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esav Benyamin</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/claudiarosett/ahmadinejad_in_the_un_armchair/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Esav Benyamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/2006/09/20/if-ahmadinejad-wants-the-un-let-him-have-it/#comment-94</guid>
		<description>It is tempting to propose leaving the UN and creating a United Democratic Nations instead, but whom shall we invite to join us?

Leaving Libya and Sudan behind but inviting France?  How about Russia and China, with whom we have extensive and important economic relations?

Even close allies like Great Britain and Israel have their own ways and their own interests, not always our own.

The original UN was an organic outgrowth of the separate and interlocking alliances of the Second World War.  We weren&#039;t all friends, but we had one overarching interest in common, and that vanished on VE Day and VJ Day.

Romantic adherence to wartime propaganda led us to invite every other nation into the club, instead of restructuring it into a western alliance more like NATO, with the power to negotiate effectively with our enemies, instead of pretending they were becoming just like us.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is tempting to propose leaving the UN and creating a United Democratic Nations instead, but whom shall we invite to join us?</p>
<p>Leaving Libya and Sudan behind but inviting France?  How about Russia and China, with whom we have extensive and important economic relations?</p>
<p>Even close allies like Great Britain and Israel have their own ways and their own interests, not always our own.</p>
<p>The original UN was an organic outgrowth of the separate and interlocking alliances of the Second World War.  We weren&#8217;t all friends, but we had one overarching interest in common, and that vanished on VE Day and VJ Day.</p>
<p>Romantic adherence to wartime propaganda led us to invite every other nation into the club, instead of restructuring it into a western alliance more like NATO, with the power to negotiate effectively with our enemies, instead of pretending they were becoming just like us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fen</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/claudiarosett/ahmadinejad_in_the_un_armchair/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Fen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 04:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/2006/09/20/if-ahmadinejad-wants-the-un-let-him-have-it/#comment-93</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Hitler&#039;s message was no different, his terms with the world the same as Mr. Achmadinejab&#039;s, yet what does the UN do?&lt;/i&gt;

&quot;If we don&#039;t offend Hitler, he will leave us alone&quot;  - Europe 1938

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Hitler&#8217;s message was no different, his terms with the world the same as Mr. Achmadinejab&#8217;s, yet what does the UN do?</i></p>
<p>&#8220;If we don&#8217;t offend Hitler, he will leave us alone&#8221;  &#8211; Europe 1938</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoJo</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/claudiarosett/ahmadinejad_in_the_un_armchair/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>JoJo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 03:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/2006/09/20/if-ahmadinejad-wants-the-un-let-him-have-it/#comment-92</guid>
		<description>There is something you said that is bothersome:

&quot;during this performance from a scruffy &lt;b&gt;little man&lt;/b&gt; in a sports jacket&quot;

What does his physical stature have to do with anything??  You make it sound as though being short is part of the problem, as if being short makes one contemptible.

Replace the word &quot;little&quot; with &quot;gay&quot; or &quot;jew&quot; or &quot;black&quot;  and this board would be lit up with comments attacking you rather than the subject of your post.  The fact that we don&#039;t see any such comments is bothersome as well ... it means it is quite acceptable to malign short men with impunity.

Look, Im not some short guy who&#039;s &quot;offended&quot; by such things. But your striking use of one&#039;s physical stature in an obviously degrading way should raise red flags immediately, and it doesn&#039;t here.  I know Amadinajad inflames passions, but lets not run roughshod over others in order to get our indignation on the record ... at the very least.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is something you said that is bothersome:</p>
<p>&#8220;during this performance from a scruffy <b>little man</b> in a sports jacket&#8221;</p>
<p>What does his physical stature have to do with anything??  You make it sound as though being short is part of the problem, as if being short makes one contemptible.</p>
<p>Replace the word &#8220;little&#8221; with &#8220;gay&#8221; or &#8220;jew&#8221; or &#8220;black&#8221;  and this board would be lit up with comments attacking you rather than the subject of your post.  The fact that we don&#8217;t see any such comments is bothersome as well &#8230; it means it is quite acceptable to malign short men with impunity.</p>
<p>Look, Im not some short guy who&#8217;s &#8220;offended&#8221; by such things. But your striking use of one&#8217;s physical stature in an obviously degrading way should raise red flags immediately, and it doesn&#8217;t here.  I know Amadinajad inflames passions, but lets not run roughshod over others in order to get our indignation on the record &#8230; at the very least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Humanoid</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/claudiarosett/ahmadinejad_in_the_un_armchair/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>The Humanoid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 23:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/2006/09/20/if-ahmadinejad-wants-the-un-let-him-have-it/#comment-91</guid>
		<description>I think we have to get positive about the good things the UN can do.  I suggest we have them institute a new UN program - spinach-for-oil. Kofi,  his family and friends can buy up the spinach fields of California and make a killing - literally. (Kofi, baby, give it some serious thought. The profit opportunites are just waiting to be picked, or is it harvested)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we have to get positive about the good things the UN can do.  I suggest we have them institute a new UN program &#8211; spinach-for-oil. Kofi,  his family and friends can buy up the spinach fields of California and make a killing &#8211; literally. (Kofi, baby, give it some serious thought. The profit opportunites are just waiting to be picked, or is it harvested)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bit Decay</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/claudiarosett/ahmadinejad_in_the_un_armchair/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Bit Decay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 19:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/2006/09/20/if-ahmadinejad-wants-the-un-let-him-have-it/#comment-98</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;What&#039;s Wrong With The UN&lt;/strong&gt;

My sentiments exactly.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What&#8217;s Wrong With The UN</strong></p>
<p>My sentiments exactly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Jefe Maximo</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/claudiarosett/ahmadinejad_in_the_un_armchair/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>El Jefe Maximo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/claudiarosett/2006/09/20/if-ahmadinejad-wants-the-un-let-him-have-it/#comment-90</guid>
		<description>As I said on my own blog, Baby Hugo and Mad Jad can get away with their antics because they know quite well that Bush and America are not devils: if they were, Baby Hugo and Mad Jad would be locked up in Guantanamo, obedient puppets would be running their countries, and nothing uttered in the United Dictators General Assembly would possibly be objectionable in any way to said devils.

Too bad we can&#039;t get rid of the UN entirely: it lets dwarf countries punch out of their weight and allows their leaders to get undue attention from the chattering classes.

That said, I don&#039;t see how we can get out of it -- we need to be in so we can throw a spanner in the works occasionally and prevent it from doing anything too stupid. But in general, too bad the thing can&#039;t collapse of its own weight - it&#039;s as bad or worse an idea and institution than the League of Nations.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said on my own blog, Baby Hugo and Mad Jad can get away with their antics because they know quite well that Bush and America are not devils: if they were, Baby Hugo and Mad Jad would be locked up in Guantanamo, obedient puppets would be running their countries, and nothing uttered in the United Dictators General Assembly would possibly be objectionable in any way to said devils.</p>
<p>Too bad we can&#8217;t get rid of the UN entirely: it lets dwarf countries punch out of their weight and allows their leaders to get undue attention from the chattering classes.</p>
<p>That said, I don&#8217;t see how we can get out of it &#8212; we need to be in so we can throw a spanner in the works occasionally and prevent it from doing anything too stupid. But in general, too bad the thing can&#8217;t collapse of its own weight &#8211; it&#8217;s as bad or worse an idea and institution than the League of Nations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

