Zawahiri’s New Videotape Shows Leadership Crisis in Al-Qaeda
The video of Ayman al-Zawahiri released on June 8 is most noteworthy for what he did not do. Despite being the official second-in-command of al-Qaeda, he did not declare, or even hint, that he is now the group’s official head. This indicates that Zawahiri is fearful of creating a fissure by asserting his authority, aware that the rank-and-file is not united behind him. It also means that the top leadership has been unable to communicate to decide on a successor, allowing contradictory reports that Zawahiri, Saif al-Adel, or Hamza bin Laden have taken the helm to spread confusion.
On June 9, a video apparently from al-Qaeda’s media arm made its way onto a jihadist forum. The tape announced that Hamza bin Laden, at only 21 years of age, was the new al-Qaeda chief. It was then deleted. He made his debut in a video in 2005 showing a battle between Pakistani forces and jihadists. An associate of Osama said in 2008 that Hamza was being groomed to replace his father. His escape from his father’s compound on May 1 is the type of story that jihadists crave in a leader. However, experienced terrorists won’t be enthusiastic about being led by a 21-year old who only became their leader because of his last name.
At the same time, there is a report that Zawahiri has taken over. Dutch intelligence documents detail a meeting held in Kuram, Pakistan, on May 9 based on the testimony of local informants. Zawahiri is said to have agreed to become the leader after Saad bin Laden rebuffed his suggestion that he replace his father. The main problem with this story is that Saad is believed to have been killed in a drone strike in 2009. It is also hard to imagine that there is an informant that deep inside al-Qaeda’s inner circle.
Al-Qaeda has a difficult decision with regards to Zawahiri. If he is not chosen as bin Laden’s successor, it will be the ultimate insult and will expose a division within the group. On the other hand, his choosing could intensify these divisions. The mere fact that al-Qaeda’s affiliates, with the exception of al-Qaeda in Iraq, have not reflexively endorsed him shows apprehension. “It is of course an anathema for al-Qaeda to hold free and fair elections, but if such elections were held, al-Zawahiri would most likely have a fight on his hands,” said one senior U.S. intelligence official.
Then there are the reports that Saif al-Adel has been designated the interim head of al-Qaeda. The very term, “interim head,” shows disarray. This was originally reported by Noman Benotman, a former Libyan Islamist who says he has access to senior members of al-Qaeda. It appeared on a jihadist forum around the same time, but it was immediately removed because the administrators felt only an announcement from a known al-Qaeda outlet should be believed. A Pakistani newspaper also reported it. There has been no official response from the terrorist group in response to the rumor.






Just to keep things in perspective, Al-Qaeda is not important, all things considered. Fine, they’re dangerous vermin that must be killed but the real danger is the Muslim Brotherhood, Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah, and pehaps even more dangerous, the supposedly ”moderate” Islamic groups that are engaged in “Stealth Jihad” ……..
Even more dangerous are the Leftist allies of Islam & the liberal air-heads who white-wash Islam.
So true.
Agreed.
Bin Laden/Al-Q has been the cameramans birdie that we were all supposed to focus our attention on less we stray and consider Islam itself as the true source of Muslims murderous gifts to the world. To those managing the demographic stealth jihad (mainly Sunnis), Al-Q must seem a risky venture with the chance of going too far too soon and putting carefully placed jihadi personnel in jeopardy. The jury will be out for sometime whether Al-Qs terror was a helpful adjunct to the larger infiltration and colonization of the West.
You are right, this battle is not about Spokesmen For Allah, it is about Islam. Killing one Soldier of Allah will not win the war. The old adage that “the best defense is a good offense” applies here. The West insists that we need only play defense against an enemy the elites can’t even bring themselves to name. Islam is on the offensive in every possible way and the West can’t mount any offense.
We even had to give Osama bin Ladin a proper Islamic funeral so as not to offend the Muslims ho will never like us no matter what we do. How cowardly is that? How can a war be won with that attitude? Killing Osama bin Ladin ultimately meant NOTHING.
Only when the West can summon the courage to confront Islam head on, and on all fronts will there be any chance of winning this war
“And whoever the successor is will fall short of bin Laden’s allure. Al-Qaeda’s stock is falling and only a big victory can revive it.”
That’s what I’m afraid of. Some homicidal lunatic in al Qaeda will try to prove that he’s top dog by pulling off another 9/11 somewhere in the world, probably here in the United States. Ironically, terrorist organizations seem more dangerous when there isn’t a confirmed leader, because the lack of leadership allows smaller, less powerful, members to strike out in dangerous ways in an attempt to seize power. Reminds me of the power struggle that occurred in the Capone gang after Capone was sent to prison. Right now is the time al Qaeda is most dangerous and I certainly hope the FBI and the CIA are on full alert, because somebody in al Qaeda may be ready to make a “statement” and that could end up killing a lot of innocent people.
All day every day some of them plot for another grand attack. The problem we have is the we don’t plan for a grand attack of their ideology. If the Gazan Hamas thugs didn’t get hundreds of millions in “humanitarian” aid because they won’t loudly proclaim their support for the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment and they had to take to the podiums to attack it, would they gather more followers? Just asking. If we can’t discuss freedom and set rules for dealing with tyrants and terrorists we will, or course, be relegated to discussing tactics and defenses of terrorism. That is a NO WIN!
It could also be a tactical decision to muddy the waters.
Who will replace OBL? Nobody in a hurry. What do you think, the guys at the top are brave? That’s for the fools, the way things usually are, you sacrifice, we benefit. Just like their sympathetic friends in the Democratic party and the filth in the White House, “rape the country, we stay on top”.
The muslim bosses had their eyes opened with the OBL rub out, if he could be reached anybody can.
In my opinion Zawahiri is a fraud. If he was authentic, he would of immediately taken over as the leader. He’s running scared right now because he knows he’s the next target. We will get him and all the other wannabe leaders.
You left out an up and coming, young leader from the AQAP, former Gitmo detainee,
Ibrahim Al Rubbaish,
What a bunch of maroons you all are! Do you really think Al-Qaeda and this Al-Suwabi guy is a threat? Do you know what the real threat to America is? SARAH PALIN! The whole Al-Qeada affair is a carefully crafted republican lie designed to keep everyone’s eye of the real issues: poverty, inner-city blight, police corruption, loose women, take you pick. It’s all a bsic conspiracy, thus you are all “conspiracy theorists”.
I’ll say this: this entire web site is clandestinely dedicated is a to keep pumping us lies and garbage to one end purpose: THE ELECTION OF SARAH PALIN! I’m convinced that is the conspiracy here. The evidence is all too clear: constant bashing of innocent progressives like Anthony Weiner and Jeannine Garafalo; total dedication to the Bush-Dynasty power grab of the oil/coal/south-african-gold-mine industries. Keep them focused on make-believe, like Al-Qaeda and mid-west tornados (another falsity), nudge Sarah in, and reach the goal of total world domination. The Tri-partate commission is all too proud of this web site!
And what drugs are you currently taking?
I’d rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy, eh?
OMG! There is so little hope for us if you and your off-spring vote!
You can also add the conspiracy of electing a senator from Illinois, with no experience, and lot’s of shady characters around him to be the President of the USA.
why do you hate America?
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
What an idiot you are.
LovelyEarth, why do you hate sanity? I love exceptional America, not your statist-Marxist abomination.
The Z-man better go along with DaOne, and Billery’s agreement with the Muslim Brotherhood to make a greater Ummah, or he will be shipped PDQ.
Lose the finger, and growl Z-man, you remind me of the Proctologist.
This article ignores the foundation of what al-Qaidah and the jihadi-salafi manhaj wants to accomplish in general.
There is no “crisis” to contend with, al-Qaidah follows the ideology of jihad and Tawheed.
While it makes sense that Westerners would immediately assume that because of various conflicting reports, that there seems to be a contradiction or a “leadership crisis”.
This is just reading into things. Firstly, Saif al-Adel was required to be the INTERIM LEADER (Ameer, and I will continue using the word “Ameer” of al-Qaidah instead of “leader” from now on.) of al Qaidah. So it’s TEMPORARY until the Majlis al Shuooraah is ready to appropriate how the Ameer will succeed.
The “Ameer” needs to have certain qualities, first, they must have an understanding of the Islamic Sharee’ah, second, they must have fighting experience, and third they must be ready to “convey the Islamic Call” (i.e., call for what Islam allows and prohibit what Islam prohibit) whenever possible, perhaps Hamza had been chosen by the idea of “Father-son” succession, but that decision is overulled by the Majlis us Shorah and thus bringing us Az-Zawahiri as the Ameer of al-Qaidah. It’s not that al-Qaidah is in a “leadership crisis” but rather, they were just assuming the Islamic “way of doing things” which made it seem unorthodox, which prompted media attention to their so-called “leadership crisis”.
“O you who have believed, obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority (the word here is “amr” which is the root word of the word “ameer”) among you. AND IF YOU DISAGREE OVER ANYTHING, REFER IT TO ALLAH AND HIS MESSENGER IF YOU TRULY BELIEVE IN ALLAH AND THE LAST DAY.” (Quran 4:59)
“Is it the literacy and understanding of the utter ignorance that you desire?” (5:50)