With a Tragedy in Libya, a Veer Back Toward Foreign Policy
Flags were lowered to half-staff around the capital today in honor of the U.S. ambassador to Libya and three members of embassy staff killed in an attack at the consulate in Benghazi.
But the tragic mob attacks in Libya and at the U.S. embassy in Cairo on Sept. 11 also spiraled into an unforeseen twist in election-season politics — toward the rarely mentioned trail topic of foreign policy. Lawmakers on the Hill, though, were quick to point out that the attacks on U.S. personnel, ostensibly sparked by anger over a trailer for an anti-Muhammad film, were not unexpected in a powder-keg landscape.
Chris Stevens, 52, was the first U.S. ambassador to die in the line of duty since 1979, when Ambassador Adolph Dubs was killed in Afghanistan.
Also killed were Foreign Service Information Management Officer Sean Smith, a husband and father of two, and two other Americans whose names have not been released.
Stevens and other staff were trying to evacuate the consulate as the well-armed mob set fire to the building. Libyan citizens brought Stevens to Benghazi Medical Center, where a doctor reportedly tried for an hour and a half to revive him yet the ambassador succumbed to smoke inhalation.
“We extend our apology to America, the American people and the whole world,” said Libya’s interim president, Mohammed el-Megarif, vowing to bring the attackers to justice. Officials said up to 10 Libyan security guards who were defending the U.S. installation were also killed.
Deputy Prime Minister Mustafa A.G. Abushagur wrote on his Facebook page that Stevens was a “dear friend” who was instrumental in helping Libyans revolt against dictator Moammar Gadhafi.
“There is never any justification for this type of action. There must and will be consequences. Those who were involved at all levels must be found and punished. These actions run counter to the very foundations of free Libya, of democracy, and of Islam. They are reprehensible,” Abushagur wrote.
“Our revolution is not complete simply because Gaddafi is gone. Our revolution will be complete when our state institutions are strong, when heavy arms are in the hands of only the government and when our streets are safe to all — both to Libyans and to our honored guests,” he continued. “The government cannot do this alone — I call on all true Libyans to hand in their weapons, and to work together to make a better Libya for all. Our shared security is the bedrock of our freedom. This kind of shameful behavior — mobs using force on their own accord — cannot happen again, no matter the target or motivation.”
Libyans also protested the attacks in Benghazi and Tripoli today, holding signs such as “Chris Smith was a friend to all Libyans” and “Benghazi is against terrorism.”
In the United States, the attacks quickly became a point of campaign contention.
“The Embassy of the United States in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims – as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions,” the embassy said in a statement yesterday as protesters scaled the walls of the compound and tore down the American flag. “We firmly reject the actions by those who abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of others.”
“I’m outraged by the attacks on American diplomatic missions in Libya and Egypt and by the death of an American consulate worker in Benghazi,” Mitt Romney said in an email sent out by his campaign last night. “It’s disgraceful that the Obama administration’s first response was not to condemn attacks on our diplomatic missions, but to sympathize with those who waged the attacks.”
President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton opened the morning with statements condemning the Benghazi attack followed by a statement to reporters in the Rose Garden.
“We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification for this type of senseless violence. None,” Obama said. “The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal acts.”
The White House maintained that it neither drafted nor approved the Cairo Embassy statement.
Romney called a press conference on the road in Jacksonville, Fla., to elaborate on the tragedy and the “mixed signals” Washington sent to the world by distancing itself from the Cairo communique.
“It’s their administration. Their administration spoke. The president takes responsibility not just for the words that come from his mouth, but also from the words that come from his ambassadors from his administration, from his embassies, from his State Department,” Romney said. “The statement that came from the administration was a statement which is akin to apology and I think was a severe miscalculation.”
Obama taped an interview for 60 Minutes later in the day in which he said the incident highlighted that “Governor Romney seems to have a tendency to shoot first and aim later.”
“The situation in Cairo was one in which an embassy that is being threatened by major protests releases a press release saying that the film that had disturbed so many Muslims around the world wasn’t representative of what Americans believe about Islam, in an effort to cool the situation down. It didn’t come from me, it didn’t come from Secretary Clinton; it came from folks on the ground who are potentially in danger,” Obama said in the interview, as read to reporters by White House press secretary Jay Carney at the daily briefing. “And my tendency is to cut folks a little bit of slack when they’re in that circumstance, rather than try to question their judgment from the comfort of a campaign office.”
“At a time of national grief, it is distasteful and undignified to hear a candidate for the White House criticizing President Obama and the actions of diplomats as hostile crowds threaten our embassy,” Rep. Betty McCollum (D-Minn.) lashed out in a statement.
The barbs were just as sharp from the right. “This administration has no concept of the Arab Spring,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) told Fox News. “They’re disengaging and the lack of leadership is about to lead to an explosion in the Middle East.”
“The fact that the host countries have mildly reacted to the attacks of the past 48 hours makes it abundantly clear that this administration’s support for their rise to power is another example of a failure in policy,” said Rep. Mark Amodei (R-Nev.).
Some weren’t eager to play political football, though. “Both the President and Gov. Romney were right in condemning these outrageous attacks on our citizens and our embassies,” tweeted Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal (R).
Sens. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) and John Kerry (D-Mass.), ranking members on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, introduced a resolution commending the bravery of the State Department officers and condemning “in the strongest possible terms, the despicable attacks on American diplomats and public servants in Benghazi” and calling “for the perpetrators of such attacks to be brought to justice.”
Obama later called Afghan President Hamid Karzai and discussed the Benghazi attack, “and the presidents discussed the importance of working together to help ensure that the circumstances that led to the violence in Libya and Egypt do not pose a threat to U.S. forces or Afghans,” according to a readout from the White House.
The United Nations Security Council also issued a statement condemning both attacks and “underlined the need to bring perpetrators of these acts to justice” and “reaffirmed that such acts are unjustifiable regardless of their motivations, whenever and by whomsoever committed.”
As reports unfolded that the Libyan attack may have been pre-planned, with the protest as a potential diversion to draw out the ambassador, Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) mused about links between the envoy’s slaying and al-Qaeda.
“These murders have the markings of revenge by al Qaeda for the death of the number two leader of the terrorist group, Abu Yahya al-Libi. The Associated Press has reported that the killing in June of al-Libi was the biggest setback to al-Qaeda since the death of Osama Bin Laden,” said Nelson, a member of the Intelligence Committee.
“In light of Monday night’s Internet-video statement by the head of al Qaeda, Ayman al-Zawahiri, who urged Libyans to attack Americans to avenge the recent death of al-Libi, I am asking my colleagues on the Senate Intelligence Committee to immediately investigate what role al Qaeda or its affiliates may have played in the attacks in Libya and Egypt, and to urge appropriate action,” he said. “For the safety of the remaining Americans, we need to secure our embassies in North Africa and around the world – and to stop terrorist-inspired mobs from doing evil deeds.”
“Since these events occurred on September 11th, I call on the Obama administration to investigate what happened and whether these attacks were coordinated,” said Sen. Jim Risch (R-Idaho). “I appreciate the statements made by the Libyan government concerning these acts and urge them to follow through on pursuing these perpetrators.”
“The perpetrators of this senseless attack must be brought to justice,” said Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.). “I, therefore, demand that until the Libyan police hand over suspects to U.S officials, any U.S. foreign aid to the government of Libya be contingent on their full support in this matter.”






Uh-huh. He died of smoke inhalation.
Yah, right. “Would you buy that for a quarter, folks?”
An Israeli paper, Arutz Sheva, reports that he may have been strangled by our Libyan “friends.”
But mustn’t go upsetting the American public, must we? They might not vote for more hope n’ change, come November.
The smoke inhalation story does sound bogus, particularly after the ugly photographs of Ambassador Stevens being manhandled.
Look, he was lynched, plain and simple. It reminds me of the lynching of the two IDF soldiers, who accidentally veered into PA territory about a decade ago, in addition to too many to count Islamic barbaric kill-fests.
It is impossible for most westerners to wrap their minds around their ‘blood lust’. Therefore, this blogger offers up a policy paper (having assisted in its review) for the public’s viewing. And, it was distributed to Congressional reps, as well as others to ‘educate’ them.
See – /2012/07/13/islam-blood-a-groundbreaking-policy-paper-contained-herein-the-world-stands-on-a-precipice-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-109/ – viewing the embedded link is mandatory reading, at least for those who really want to understand the Islamic love affair with blood.
/2012/09/08/clash-of-civilizations-revealed-by-pentagon-obscured-by-barack-hussein-obama-what-is-going-on-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/
/2012/08/31/islamists-whatever-their-stripes-are-bloodthirsty-assads-butchers-his-opponents-too-six-of-onehalf-dozen-of-another-addendum-toislam-blood-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/
So every tragedy gets immediately politicized and instantly reduced to barbs and demands flying back and forth.
No one gets smarter, nothing changes.
Maybe if the empty chair had been attending his intelligence briefings over the past week, there might have been a heads up on these coordinated 911 attacks.
And yes springing that old blind sheik who orchestrated the 1993 WTC attack is a major, announced goal of Egypt’s new Brotherhood honchos.
Thank you for the quite informative and well parsed article. HAVE been reading around and the coverage has predominantly devolved into “telling it how my prism permits me to see”.
Now is the perfect time for the blind shiekh to have a heart attack and die in prison.
Smoke Inhilation
Not going to happen. He’s going to be pardoned “In the name of peace” and to appease rioting masses of “Arab Spring” devotees. This was orchestrated to spring that piece of garbage.
We truly have a problem. Those who are already on one side will read this as insincere, fauxlksy, strawman-setting pap. Those already on the other side will read it as wise, comfortable, and appropriately and subtly barbed. And there’s no changing anyone’s minds.
why wasn’t the ambassador guarded?
wag the dog
Investigate! Investigate! Lawmakers always call for investigations and when or if they get results they sit around like a bunch of damn monkeys and squeal at each other.
I hate the knee jerk phrase in all these kinds of situations…assurances we’ll “bring the perpetrators to justice”
The perpetrators are getting away with holy hell, all over the planet.
If you saw the 14 min. clip, the film is juvenile. And Terry Jones (he who made such a big deal threatening to burn a Koran) seems to go out of his way to “insult” Islam.
BUT, the film is at least somewhat “representative” of what some Americans believe about Islam, particularly some Americans who have read the Koran and learned about Mohammed’s life.
Film Clip
It was made by Libyan ex-pats!
This film clip is so dumb it makes no sense whatsoever. It is incomprehensible. How can anyone get any kind of message from it? I am still trying to figure out what it is about. The only thing that appeared to make some sense was the Egyptian police beating up some christians. The rest of it????
The line about Mohammed collecting ideas from the Christian and Jewish traditions and making an amalgam has some truth, especially since he solicited ideas from the Jews of Medina.
Some of the Aisha, Khadija, Mohammed’s sex life rings true although the presentation is rather farcical.
Your mileage may vary.
Apparently the 13-minute film everyone’s watching is a “trailer” — the world’s longest. So most of the movie would be left out, not that that would necessarily help.
The issue with Romney’s reaction? He was spot on. The reflexive apology from the American Embassy (as it was being attacked, no less) for this incomprehensible nonsense of a film was absolutely the wrong signal to send. I guess Obama apologizing for the apologists by saying on 60 minutes “I’ve got to give them a break given the stress they were under” is beyond ridiculous. It is precisely at these times the our resolve should be clear as a bell. Sorry, O, you’re going to go. No amount of spin is going to help you this time.
– MSM spin against Romney and service Obama, added to what we are now learning about ALL involved, it seems like a set-up.
It was convenient for the leftists and Salafists to “blame” an obscure film by Coptic Christians and a flake for an assault…just like leftists blame every act of outrageous violence on non-leftists.
But here’s the reality of it.
Ft. Hood, Gabby Giffords, and whatever some dupe at ABC might conjur up by Googling the name of the latest nutcase does NOT implicate conservatives in the underlying violence that arose from the weakness of a lame President and his administration.
The apology tour has spawned a million emboldened enemies.
Al-Zawhiri is alive and General Motors is dying.
“Al-Zawhiri is alive and General Motors is dying.”
Gotta steal that one!
let’s see. sept. 11 coming up. what would a good commander of our military be looking for from our enemies? any American with any sense at all would be looking for trouble from those who want us dead. maybe be on alert, as a minimal precaution? oh wait, that’s right, he’s out running for office, as usual. and as usual, an apology to anybody and everybody. no leadership abilities whatsoever, and does it ever show.
that’s exactly why our forefathers required in the constitution that the prez be a natural born citizen. somebody who actually cares about their country. somebody looking out for our people/country. i am always amazed how wise our ancestors were.
Under accepted conditions of not too long ago these Embassy/Consular attacks would be literally Acts of War, requiring Declarations of War.
Now, now….lets not hear any of this politically correct, ..”.but…but…these are civilian, un-uniformed, guerilla militia-like groups from the “Religion of Peace”, or…in the words frequently written on PJMedia, those “mis-understanders of Islam”, and so the traditional views are no longer applicable. Nonsense.
What does it take to convince the leader-ship of this Nation to accept the fact that we’ve been at War with these Muslims since they murdered so many people using civilian passenger airliners as guided missiles….Muslim piloted human guided missiles….during those infamous attacks on Manhattan and Washington, D.C…..the Nation’s Capitol.
Short of an armed retaliation…against…what, exactly?….. an amorphous, vaporous vanishing enemy of “civilians”?,no…. it’d appear the the sensible, most painful approach towards these basket-case dangerous, artificially bordered “Nations” would be to immediately cut off all of the US Dollar Faucets in North Africa, and also that veritable Dollar Hose feeding Maliki-Karzai and Company, Limited….then in due course, those Pakistani double-players.
Close our Embassy/Legations in these Muslim nations immediately, move out, and quarantine those murdering Muslim nation states enabling them to kill each other unhindered by “diplomacy” and/or “negotiation”.
I agree.
Continuing to muck about in Islamist cesspools with meetings, false promises and American billions is beyond stupid.
Natzofast, Guido. We, (dar al Harb) have been at war with dar al Islam since the day the archangel Gabriel (supposedly) whispered sweet nothings in Muhammad’s ear.
It is a conquering, totalitarian ideology dressed up in the trappings of a religion. They will not know peace until all before them have been subjugated.
The only acceptable statement today would have been something to the effect that: “I have given the order to every US Embassy Marine guard detachment commander that they are to shoot to kill, any, and every attempt to violate sovereign US soil over the walls or through the gates. And I have further ordered that guard detachments and ammunition supplies be increased to ensure that my orders are carried out. We can be your best friend, or your worst enemy, the choice is yours.”
My first recollection of muslims attacking this country was the assassination of Robert Kennedy by the Palestinian Sirhan Sirhan.
Might want to look into the thug-arm of the Muslim Brotherhood, the Ultras, fans of Cairo’s famed Al Ahly soccer club. Why were they at the U.S. Embassy? Why are they still there right now? Why is the MB calling for a million man march on Friday, supposedly about this film, but also with recent demands for the release of prisoners at Guantanamo and the Blind Shiekh. And who knows when the embassy will be open again?
A simple declarative statement is all that is needed. “Any attack on any US Embassy or Consultate from this minute forward would be considered a hostile act against the interests of the United States tantamount to war. If this occurs again we will take appropriate action at at time and a place of our choosing against all groups and nation states supporting such groups. We expect going forward that this will not happen again.”
Well, this and: “Anyone who forcibly enters sovereign US soil will be shot on sight. No questions asked.”
THIS!
As a former Foreign Service officer, the story on the Libyan attack that we have so far seems incomplete. There are not enough “good guys” in it. Could it be that the other consulate staffers were successfully evacuated, possibly by the Marine guards, at the insistence of the ambassador, who stayed behind with the information specialist to destroy classified documents and equipment?
Given the lack of hostages and other casualties, very probably.
Income, Poverty and Health Insurance Coverage: 2011
Wednesday, Sept. 12, 2012
http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/news_conferences/20120912_ip_newsconf.html
I’ve noticed the emphasis from the Left today has been not on four dead Americans including an ambassador, or the fact we’ve given $200,000,000 to Libya since the spring, but what Mitt Romney said about Obama’s weakness. HOW DARE HE!
It wasn’t but four months ago I was hearing the Muslim Brotherhood was over their “man made disaster” period from the same folk.
I suddenly am having flashbacks to one Jimmy Carter. All we need is the killer rabbit.
Yesterday reminded me of the very depressed feeling I had after Jimmy Carter’s failed rescue attempt of Iranian hostages. There are far too many similarities. Unfortunately, the man elected president has absolutely no common sense and the media and a percentage of Americans support the foolhearty man. They are even ready to excuse his continuing money-raising political activities during this period of national crisis. I can only hope he is not elected for a second term.
What was Ambassador Chris Stevens’s boss’ orders on security and rules of engagement? Who is he/she, and should he/she be terminated? What did we know, when did we know it, what are the knowns and unknowns? Did Libyans rushed to defend us, and who are the bad guys? If we catch them, do we have a prison to put them in? A court to try them? Rules governing their trial?
I am sorry for the State Department employees who were killed in the line of duty. I am equally sorry for the DoD employees who are killed in the line of duty. I have grave questions about the competency of their bosses. I suspect we are losing people due to stupid bosses, since 09/11/01.
My question is: why is our embassy in London literally a fortified castle with a moat (a pretty castle, but fortified nonetheless) while our Libyan embassy apparently didn’t even have Marine guards?
Our whole federal government is populated by enemies of Western Civilization. Barack Obama, of course, but also Republicans like John McCain, Condi Rice and Marco Rubio (who may just be an easily lead by the nose adolescent). And this includes not just the State Department but the “sacred cow” military too which under it’s current generals especially the Army Generals (Patton would have most of them shot) isn’t worth a warm bucket of spit. In fact a warm bucket of spit would be better. And the King’s Ransom they collectively cost us is just insult added to injury.
let’s see, Cambodia and South Vietnam, down the tubes, thanks to a democratic congress bugging out. Jimmy the peanut farmer Carter looses Iran to the Persian version of the Muslim Brotherhood. Looks like Obama just lost Egypt and tossed Libya and said so long to Iraq while bailing on Afghanistan. Looks like North Africa is history. Oh, I forgot, wasn’t it the democrats who lost China under Truman? It’s nice to see the democrats are still batting zip with flat line learning curves. Truly, when it comes to democrats and foreign policy their past record of failures are a pretty good predictor of future performance. Well, at least Ike got a stalemate in Korea after coming out of a win in WW2.
“Vietnam in Retrospect: Could We Have Won?” from the US Army War College Quarterly, Winter 1996-97.
Some excerpts -
Norman Podhoretz, who believes that American intervention in the Vietnam War was “an attempt born of noble ideals and impulses,” has concluded that “the only way the United States could have avoided defeat in Vietnam was by staying out of the war altogether.” His judgment, in retrospect, appears to be as reasonable as any. The United States intervened in the Vietnam War on behalf of a weak and incompetent ally, and it pursued a conventional military victory against a wily, elusive, and extraordinarily determined opponent who shifted to ultimately decisive conventional military operations only after inevitable American political exhaustion undermined potentially decisive US military responses. Even had the United States attained a conclusive military decision, its cost would have exceeded any possible benefit. Vietnam was then, and remains today, a strategic backwater, and the US decision to fight there in the 1960s was driven by a doctrine of containing communism that in the 1950s was witlessly militarized and indiscriminately extended to all of Asia. Bernard Brodie observed in the early 1970s that “it is now clear what we mean by calling the United States intervention in Vietnam a failure. We mean that at least as early as the beginning of 1968 even the most favorable outcome could not remotely be worth the price we would have paid for it.”
I read Norman’s book years ago: of course, your thesis does not explain why the Korean War intervention finally “worked”. In my opinion, if, around 1967, we had decided to quit screwing around on the tactical and strategic defense in the South and had taken the war to the North Vietnamese heartland, we could have had a Korean War ending. We certainly had the military assets and air power on the scene–1st Cav, 1st Infantry, 11th Armored Cav, etc, to have rolled north. It would have been great. It would have been over in about two months with the North Vietnamese crying uncle over loosing Haiphong and Hanoi as the politburo beat feat for the Chinese border: of course, we would have had to threaten the Chinese with nukes at the time, but we did that during the Korean War and it worked. All that was lacking was the political will, not the capabilities to do it.
“Indochina is devoid of decisive military objectives and the allocation of more than token US armed forces in Indochina would be a serious diversion of limited US capabilities” (Joint Chiefs of Staff, 26 May 1954).
“The United States could not have prevented the forcible reunification of Vietnam under communist auspices at a morally, materially, and strategically acceptable price.” (The US Army War College Quarterly, Winter 1996-97).
Congress basically gave authorization for the Vietnam War with the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, a resolution based on ‘events’, part of which were highly exaggerated and part of which never happened. 50,000 more Americans then went on to die. “There is nothing new under the sun”.
“The White House maintained that it neither drafted nor approved the Cairo Embassy statement.”
Who knows? Maybe they did. Maybe they didn’t. Bottom line is that this is the RESPONSIBILITY of the Obama/Clinton State Dept. So either Obama and his administration are either a conga-line of inept power-drunk amateurs, OR they are a cabal of leftist liars who know exactly what they are doing.
– did not have a hand in this business?
al-Qaeda, al-Smida – it’s all the same Islam.
THE CHAIR IN THE OVAL OFFICE WAS “EMPTY” AND PEOPLE DIED.
“At a time of national grief, it is distasteful and undignified to hear a candidate for the White House criticizing President Obama and the actions of diplomats as hostile crowds threaten our embassy,” Rep. Betty McCollum (D-Minn.) lashed out in a statement.”
Pity the Democrats, like Obama, Hillary Clinton, Pelosi, and Reid (to name only a precious few), had no problems saying some of the worst things about George W. Bush and the Iraq war back in either 2004 or 2008. They are the worst hypocrites that are crawling on the face of the planet, and in November we’ll see just how far all their carping has gotten them. I don’t think it will take them very far. Romney actually LOOKED presidential the other day while making his speech. Obama looked small and spoke almost in a way that sounded like he was apologizing for what had happened. Obama will lose in November because Americans don’t want a fourth term for the Carter administration (Obama’s election was the third term of the Carter administration, and we all saw how well that turned out).
As one that has worked in over 20 countries, allow me to highlight what became SOP following the taking of US Embassy hostages in 1979.
When I went abroad for business I checked in to the Security Officer at the US Embassy. The security situation was explained and safe operating procedures were reviewed. Said office, had a list of our meetings and respective locations. We were informed who to contact in case of an emergency, 24-7.
It so happened that on a computer training mission to local development planners in a Latin American country a military coup broke out. We were a few blocks from the Presidential Palace and were caught in a cross-fire.
Within 15 minutes of contact with US Embassy a US Embassy vehicle with bullet proof windows pulled up in front of the building to pick us up at the exact time we were told to be ready.
A US guard with a sawed off shotgun grabbed my arm and escorted me to the vehicle and I was wisked away to my hotel where a guard with an uzi machine gun sat at a table outside my door all night.
The airport was closed but we received updates and were informed I would be on an evacuation airplane the next morning with the US Ambassador.
This happened two days before my scheduled wedding. I made it home safely and have been happily married for 30 years.
Simply put, there is no excuse for all US installations abroad to not have been made aware of heightened security concerns and foolproof protective measures to have been instituted well in advance. Especially, on the anniversary of 9-11 with the ever present unrest and turmoil clearly evident.
In the case of the tragic events this past September 11th in Libya, it is important to understand what the Marine Corps Embassy Security Group’s primary mission is.
Marine Security Guards (MSG) primary mission is to provide internal security to U.S. diplomatic and consular facilities in order to prevent the compromise of classified material vital to the national security of the United States. MSGs secondary mission is to provide protection for U.S. citizens and U.S government property located within designated U.S. diplomatic and consular premises during a crisis situation.
MSGs normally do not perform day to day personal security detail for the Ambassador every time he travels off embassy grounds. Private security contractors, other Department of State security assets, or host nation police/military often supplement security when the Ambassador moves outside the confines of the embassy. In most cases, depending on the threat in the country where the embassy is located, MSGs are small squad or platoon sized elements headed by a Staff Sergeant or Gunnery Sergeant. They are focused generally at their primary mission, protecting the diplomatic and consular grounds.
Initial reports seem to indicate that since the Benghazi consulate was in interim facility, decisions were made not to have a MSG element stationed there. The Department of State has the mission of coordinating security for its embassies not only with the Marine Corps Embassy Security Group, but also with many other entities to include the host nation. While undoubtedly there will be further investigation into the circumstances behind the 11 SEP incident, it is incorrect to make early judgments about the ‘failure’ of the MSG to protect the Ambassador and his staff. Perhaps one of the few positive elements from this tragedy will be the ability to capture key lessons learned to ensure this type of attack does not occur again.
Marco A Bongioanni
Major, Civil Affairs
U.S. Army Command and General Staff College
“The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.”