<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will the Real Ralph Nader Please Stand Up?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/will_the_real_ralph_nader_plea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/will_the_real_ralph_nader_plea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:13:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CK Canon</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/will_the_real_ralph_nader_plea/#comment-24043</link>
		<dc:creator>CK Canon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-the-real-ralph-nader-please-stand-up/#comment-24043</guid>
		<description>If caucuses are discarded, as well as the states that vote red, Obama would not have a delegate lead.  This doesn&#039;t even factor in Florida and Michigan, who Obama supporters want to disenfranchise.  Caucuses shouldn&#039;t count anyway since they disenfranchise seniors, people who work, military personnel, and so forth.  If done like Washington state, my state, they don&#039;t even check voter registration so there are thousands who aren&#039;t even registered who participate (please prove me wrong).  To his faithful, Obama says super delegates should vote the will of the people, and at the same time behind the scenes he is donating far more money to super delegates (as reported by NY Times) than Clinton.  If listening to talk radio is any guide, many republicans will vote for Obama (the most liberal in the senate) in the upcoming primaries and elections, because they know he won&#039;t stand a chance in November.  Of course I am bitter because Hillary is going to lose, but the best candidates are gone thanks to an outrageously bad nominating system.   I&#039;ll probably get over it by November, but why not vote for Nader?  Why should I care?  Truth be told, for the first time in my life I will consider voting republican for president.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If caucuses are discarded, as well as the states that vote red, Obama would not have a delegate lead.  This doesn&#8217;t even factor in Florida and Michigan, who Obama supporters want to disenfranchise.  Caucuses shouldn&#8217;t count anyway since they disenfranchise seniors, people who work, military personnel, and so forth.  If done like Washington state, my state, they don&#8217;t even check voter registration so there are thousands who aren&#8217;t even registered who participate (please prove me wrong).  To his faithful, Obama says super delegates should vote the will of the people, and at the same time behind the scenes he is donating far more money to super delegates (as reported by NY Times) than Clinton.  If listening to talk radio is any guide, many republicans will vote for Obama (the most liberal in the senate) in the upcoming primaries and elections, because they know he won&#8217;t stand a chance in November.  Of course I am bitter because Hillary is going to lose, but the best candidates are gone thanks to an outrageously bad nominating system.   I&#8217;ll probably get over it by November, but why not vote for Nader?  Why should I care?  Truth be told, for the first time in my life I will consider voting republican for president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bemac</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/will_the_real_ralph_nader_plea/#comment-24042</link>
		<dc:creator>Bemac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 03:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-the-real-ralph-nader-please-stand-up/#comment-24042</guid>
		<description>Nader was irrelevant in 2000.  Gore lost the election in his home state of Tennessee, not Florida.  (Florida was where Team Gore hoped to turn its loss into a win.)

If Gore had managed to win his home state, he had more than enough electoral votes to claim the White House, Nader or no Nader.  But even with Nader&#039;s votes in the Volunteer State, Gore wouldn&#039;t have won Tennessee.

Team Gore came up with a campaign strategy that cost him the electoral votes of his home state.  I suspect Gore realizes that Nader had nothing to do with his loss.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nader was irrelevant in 2000.  Gore lost the election in his home state of Tennessee, not Florida.  (Florida was where Team Gore hoped to turn its loss into a win.)</p>
<p>If Gore had managed to win his home state, he had more than enough electoral votes to claim the White House, Nader or no Nader.  But even with Nader&#8217;s votes in the Volunteer State, Gore wouldn&#8217;t have won Tennessee.</p>
<p>Team Gore came up with a campaign strategy that cost him the electoral votes of his home state.  I suspect Gore realizes that Nader had nothing to do with his loss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david still</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/will_the_real_ralph_nader_plea/#comment-24041</link>
		<dc:creator>david still</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 01:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-the-real-ralph-nader-please-stand-up/#comment-24041</guid>
		<description>He looks older than even McCain and I for one want a new gang of crooks in power...out with the old! McCain is a what? check his record and check his speeches. ILf I were inteested in war, he would be my guy--stay the course with your kids but not mine.

Ralph knows what is wrong he just doesn&#039;t realize  those that can fix it benefit by the way it is and so won&#039;t fix it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He looks older than even McCain and I for one want a new gang of crooks in power&#8230;out with the old! McCain is a what? check his record and check his speeches. ILf I were inteested in war, he would be my guy&#8211;stay the course with your kids but not mine.</p>
<p>Ralph knows what is wrong he just doesn&#8217;t realize  those that can fix it benefit by the way it is and so won&#8217;t fix it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcjoyce</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/will_the_real_ralph_nader_plea/#comment-24040</link>
		<dc:creator>mcjoyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-the-real-ralph-nader-please-stand-up/#comment-24040</guid>
		<description>Why is this Dem crying about Ralph? Ralphy brings out voters to the polls, and when they get there they vote for Democrat candidates for Congress and Senate. In order for Ralphy to actually hurt poor poor Hillary or Barack, he has to cause Hill/Barry to run behind McCain in a state and thus lose its electoral votes. Unlikely, so stop your sobbing.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is this Dem crying about Ralph? Ralphy brings out voters to the polls, and when they get there they vote for Democrat candidates for Congress and Senate. In order for Ralphy to actually hurt poor poor Hillary or Barack, he has to cause Hill/Barry to run behind McCain in a state and thus lose its electoral votes. Unlikely, so stop your sobbing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/will_the_real_ralph_nader_plea/#comment-24039</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-the-real-ralph-nader-please-stand-up/#comment-24039</guid>
		<description>He lied about the Corvair under oath to  Congress, and he has lied about everything since then.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He lied about the Corvair under oath to  Congress, and he has lied about everything since then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vail Beach</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/will_the_real_ralph_nader_plea/#comment-24038</link>
		<dc:creator>Vail Beach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-the-real-ralph-nader-please-stand-up/#comment-24038</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t recall the same howls of outrage when Ross Perot ensured the victory of Bill Clinton in 1992 and ensured Dole had no realistic chance to win in &#039;96.  Some third party candidates are more entitled to run for office than others.

The assumption in Merrit&#039;s piece and others like it is that Nader is insincere or stupid when he says there is no difference between Dems and Reeps.  How dare she say that?

I&#039;ll say this.  If Gore had been president during 9/11, much of what Bush felt compelled to do to protect the country, including possibly an invasion of Iraq, would have been carried out by Gore.  No matter what he says now.  Nader might have altered Gore&#039;s career path, but I don&#039;t think he changed history much.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t recall the same howls of outrage when Ross Perot ensured the victory of Bill Clinton in 1992 and ensured Dole had no realistic chance to win in &#8217;96.  Some third party candidates are more entitled to run for office than others.</p>
<p>The assumption in Merrit&#8217;s piece and others like it is that Nader is insincere or stupid when he says there is no difference between Dems and Reeps.  How dare she say that?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll say this.  If Gore had been president during 9/11, much of what Bush felt compelled to do to protect the country, including possibly an invasion of Iraq, would have been carried out by Gore.  No matter what he says now.  Nader might have altered Gore&#8217;s career path, but I don&#8217;t think he changed history much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewin Wickes</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/will_the_real_ralph_nader_plea/#comment-24037</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewin Wickes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-the-real-ralph-nader-please-stand-up/#comment-24037</guid>
		<description>Democrats were furious with me for voting for Nader in 2000.  &quot;If Nader had not run,&quot; they would say, &quot;Gore would have been elected.&quot; I would reply, &quot;Yes, if no one else runs against your candidate, he will win every time.&quot; It always strikes me as a profoundly undemocratic impulse when  people get angry at third party candidates for being &quot;spoilers.&quot;  If someone thinks he has a better plan, then he should run for office, and more power to him. If Democrats don&#039;t want Nader running, then they should offer him a job.  That&#039;s how it works.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrats were furious with me for voting for Nader in 2000.  &#8220;If Nader had not run,&#8221; they would say, &#8220;Gore would have been elected.&#8221; I would reply, &#8220;Yes, if no one else runs against your candidate, he will win every time.&#8221; It always strikes me as a profoundly undemocratic impulse when  people get angry at third party candidates for being &#8220;spoilers.&#8221;  If someone thinks he has a better plan, then he should run for office, and more power to him. If Democrats don&#8217;t want Nader running, then they should offer him a job.  That&#8217;s how it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/will_the_real_ralph_nader_plea/#comment-24036</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-the-real-ralph-nader-please-stand-up/#comment-24036</guid>
		<description>Ralph Nader is irrelevant, but because of the potential close results in some states the few votes he draws could csuse another 4 years of right wing Republican rule. What an egomaniac.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ralph Nader is irrelevant, but because of the potential close results in some states the few votes he draws could csuse another 4 years of right wing Republican rule. What an egomaniac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul a'barge</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/will_the_real_ralph_nader_plea/#comment-24035</link>
		<dc:creator>paul a'barge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-the-real-ralph-nader-please-stand-up/#comment-24035</guid>
		<description>Wahhhh.... Ralph is going to make us lose the Presidential election ... again!!! Wahhhh!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wahhhh&#8230;. Ralph is going to make us lose the Presidential election &#8230; again!!! Wahhhh!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Zigfeld</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/will_the_real_ralph_nader_plea/#comment-24034</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Zigfeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/will-the-real-ralph-nader-please-stand-up/#comment-24034</guid>
		<description>Anyone who steals votes from Democrats (especially, as James says, unqualified Democrats on the fast track to ruining the country)is A-OK in my book. I&#039;d like to buy him dinner! Not that I&#039;d be in the restaurant at the time, or even in the state, but I&#039;d happily pick up the check.

Run, Ralph, run!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who steals votes from Democrats (especially, as James says, unqualified Democrats on the fast track to ruining the country)is A-OK in my book. I&#8217;d like to buy him dinner! Not that I&#8217;d be in the restaurant at the time, or even in the state, but I&#8217;d happily pick up the check.</p>
<p>Run, Ralph, run!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

