Get PJ Media on your Apple

Will Women Sacrifice Our Republic for Sex?

Sex is the sexist target of the Democrats.

by
Janine Turner

Bio

November 7, 2013 - 11:11 pm
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

As the polls continue to reflect, female voters have significant sway in the election process and in election results. Women proved to be the final contributing factor in Terry McAuliffe’s victory as the new governor of Virginia Tuesday night. The margin was incredibly slim, yet it was women who carried the day for McAuliffe and for the Democrats’ agenda — an agenda which ironically handcuffs women and the women’s movement. The Democrats’ promise of independence for women is an empty promise.

As we approach two pivotal elections in 2014 and 2016 it’s rather vital for the survival of our democratic republic that women pay heed to the fact that not all forms of independence stem from the womb. This womb jerk reaction in the voting booth is a response upon which the Democrats rely. They hold the baby rattle over women’s heads to distract them from the true intention of the party. Dependence. This is a deception dripping in irony because women have fought for centuries for independence of mind and spirit.

The Democrats are ignoring women as a complete soul — one of intellect, courage, talent, and leadership — and focusing on the age-old tradition of treating women as sexual objects.

Haven’t we been trying to prove for centuries that we are more than our bodies? Yet this is the sole focus of the Democrats’ campaign for women — because it’s the only one they have — their reproductive organs.

Women are still sex symbols to the Democratic Party. So much for burning the bras. No “I Am Woman Hear Me Roar” from the Democrats’ camp. It’s sex and reproduction, sex and reproduction. Sex is the sexist target of the Democrats.

Amazingly, women fall for these antics. Like a blind man on a tightrope, women who vote for Democrats fall prey to the seduction of voting solely for sexual independence.

Yet independence is varied and complex to the complete woman. It reaches beyond — way beyond — sex.

What good is sexual freedom if all other freedoms are sacrificed in the process?

There are many battles for freedom that women should be fighting. Battles that have huge implications for not only themselves but for their families and their country.

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
As a single woman myself, I have often wondered why my fellow singles tend to vote democrat. It's like they don't even live in the same world that I do. Do they have any inkling at all how "progressive" policies have impacted the cost of living. I was watching some of the exit polling done after the McAuliffe/Cuccinelli race and it all seemed to boil down to some esoteric "he's bad for women" mantra. When pinned down they would mention "keeping abortion legal". I didn't realize banning abortion was part of the Cuccinelli platform. Or that he would have the power to overturn Roe v Wade single handedly. It must be nice to be so wealthy that you can overlook the rising costs of living in our society and focus entirely on some non-existent threat.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
In a word, yes.

Women like JT are rare nowadays. As has been documented on this and other sites, the removal of Judeochristian morals has caused a reversion of most women living in the West to hypergamic robots not significantly different from baboon-troupe females.

Women who have sunk to this level of behavior are very easily controlled by cynical sociopathic men, in several ways.

First, these men have redefined the family from the definition the West has know for millennia - husband, wife, child - to a new model of state, woman, child optional. To a woman in primitive primate thought mode (this would include the vast bulk of urban and suburban women under fifty) this is ideal, because it means they owe nothing to any particular man and can behave sexually however they please without a thought for consequences (the new "husband", the state, will either provide for the child of the one-night-stand or will cover the expense of aborting the child).

Secondly, they have used the bully pulpit of the media and the Gramscian termite in academia to very effectively convince these types of women that anyone who opposes the new definition of the family, or the laws that have been passed to coincide with it, are actually out to harm women ( the whole "barefoot and pregnant" hysteria).

Finally, through affirmative action and harassment laws and the divorce industry, they have given women already proven to be amoral to the point of sociopathy access to wealth and opportunity which men cannot access, and, socially,ultimate power over men, which, due to their state of amorality and sociopathy, postmodern women will never relinquish in the manner of men 100 years ago voting to extend the vote to women. Feminism was never, ever about equality. It was ALWAYS about domination and vengeance.

All the while, the women who have fallen for this dog and pony show tell themselves that this is empowering them beyond being sex objects, when it fact they have been manipulated into becoming nothing more than their vaginas and their emotions.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Democrats focus on sexuality to entice certain groups to vote for them because it's all about the emotions and it's easy. Gays, lesbians, bi-sexuals, the transgendered, young people and women are all swayed to vote Democrat because the Democrats tell them it's okay, even noble, to make one's sexuality the most important part of their lives. They even have an easy solution for unwanted pregnancies if you'll just vote for them.

The left created the sexual revolution in the '60s simply because they knew that people whose primary focus was a narcissistic obsession with their own bodies would have a narrow outlook, less curiosity about the other aspects of life and become more pliable. There's always a method behind the seeming madness of the left.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (141)
All Comments   (141)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
When are women going to realize that every time they help the Democrats they are pushing back there chances to get real reform in how rape cases are prosecuted , it's the democrats,,, they are for lenient sentences for rapists , when are women going to realize it's more about pleasure than control ,at parties scumbags drug the women and make them think they got drunk and passed out when in reality they are drugged molested and they don't know the difference till the Std's show up leaving the women to blame themselves , now you have women fighting for prosecution in military cases , women are too busy looking at the effect (the Pregnancy ) instead of looking at the cause, this is the Democratic (human egg) shell game
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Not only do Democrat leaders take the side of notorious criminals, they also want them out of jail, able to vote, and celebrated in movies. But worse, they scream that physically weaker citizens including most women must not defend themselves against criminals, or face prosecution themselves. Bottom line is, Democrat leaders want American women living in fear. Fearful people are more apt to follow demagogues.
If prayer says post this, I will.
50 weeks ago
50 weeks ago Link To Comment
Too many women vote on "single issue politics", (such as reproductive rights), for the same reason many Seniors do. i.e, "don't touch 'my social security'", or "don't touch 'my medicare'. I know of one male Senior (a decorated WWII vet) who believed that Romney would destroy the Ponzi Scheme we call social security, so he voted for Obama. ALL are "low information voters".
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
I completely agree with this comment. Young women (and men) are usually low information voters and obtain their political news from TV, Facebook, their friends, the alphabet news, and newspapers. I was a LIV when I was that age too. Until there are Conservative TV shows, newspapers, and until the Conservative R's learn to articulate their values and positions, e.g. Cruz, within the MSM, the D's will continue to win close elections.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
I began posting here while your website staff allowed only one post I submitted. Since I started posting here, your website also posted one of three I submitted 15 days earlier. I again thank PJM for not censoring me here. Hopefully you see one of my posts and let us post on your website as well. Then hopefully you will help our soldiers.

I fear my response here will be quickly hidden among all the other comments this column is inspiring. But I post and hope you see this one here.

I don’t think women vote Democrat over abortion or other sexual “freedom” issues.
I believe it is much simpler.
One major difference between men and women, is that the latter are social. Women love to socialize. That is what the Democrat Party focuses on.

If you put 100 women into a room, and at the south wall stand a man who the media has lauded as good and wise and caring, and at the north wall a man the media has denounced as evil, mean, uncaring, stupid, and base, then the 100 women will flock to the south wall.

It is that simple. The Democrat Party and its media allies pour unending judgment out on conservative candidates. They drench them with it.

Look at TV shows tailored for a female audience. They are nothing but judgment fests. The audience is packed with women. The host brings out a target. The host judges the target as bad. The audience backs her assessment. Day after day after day on morning and afternoon television this repeats with different targets.

Look at Yahoo when you log on, if that is your home page like it is for me. Judgment, judgment, judgment. This person (a liberal) is wonderful. This person (a conservative) is evil. See how the “good” liberal is pictured with a bold, dynamic photo. See how the “bad” conservative is pictured with a scandalously unflattering photo. That is why women predominately vote for Democrat candidates.

How do you break this juggernaut? Cripple its sources.
Mock the judgment TV shows. Mock Yahoo’s front page. Mock the magazine articles.
In other words, start judging back.
And for goodness sake, start mocking these TV show hosts and magazine writers who heap this judgment stuff on us.

Why do social people vote for the one everyone says is good and wise, and not check the one everyone condemns? Because if you stand next to one the media condemns, it might condemn you as well.
That is how Democrat candidates win elections.

I need a morning or afternoon television show, filled with an audience of conservative women, with the host discussing liberal target after liberal target as they join in judging them as being bad. The targets will never appear on the show. I don’t care. Let prominent liberals finally feel what it is like in absentia. Let Yahoo front page people feel what it is like. Let Saturday Night Life creepy writers feel what it is like. Let them face judgment like they dispense. And then they will crumble under the weight of female condemnation.

If prayer says post this, I will.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Single women vote for Democrats not just because of abortion, but out of fear. No matter what the propaganda and the bluster about independence, deep down most people, both women and men, want someone special in their lives to rely on. We want a special someone who's always there, who will help when the going gets tough. Women who don't marry and have children, or whose marriage breaks up, or who have children outside of marriage, can easily be lured into marrying Uncle Sam instead of a real man. Unfortunately, Uncle Sam is the meanest, stingiest, most controlling, most unreliable husband there ever was. Single women swooned over Obama and supported ObamaCare because they felt (not thought) it would make them feel safe. Now they're getting an unpleasant shock as their private or employer health insurance policies get cancelled, and find that ObamaCare costs more than they can afford. It remains to be seen if enough single women will figure out that only a fool wants to marry Uncle Sam.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
What does abortion have to do with sexual freedom? Is anyone suggesting any limitations [or requirements] on who, when, where a woman can engage in sexual activity? I'm not aware of any, not even that supreme "bad for women" ogre Ken Cuccinelli. But when the process that nature has been perfecting for millions of years creates a human life, and protections are extended to all those human lives, that has nothing to do with restricting sexual activity or freedom. It solely has to do with protecting life, an entirely separate matter.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
"Haven’t we been trying to prove for centuries that we are more than our bodies?"

Anybody remember that book, "Our bodies, ourselves"?

The Feminist movement appears to push the idea that women should be sluts, and be respected for it. Men, of course, are still derided (properly) for such an attitude. A reverse double standard, in other words.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
"Who offers freedom from unemployment for themselves, their husbands, and their children?"

I suspect that these women may have children, but not husbands. and employment is not what they are looking for.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
It would seem that the reason the Democrats win in Virginia, is simply because the Democrats expansion of the Federal government during the recession has flooded Northern Virginia and Southern Maryland with Federal Employees. Shrink government and the problem solves itself.

I'm sure the Democrats realize this.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Ms. Turner:

Do you agree with the posters here that women should not have the right to vote?
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
I believe Ann Coulter has made this claim, half-seriously, I suppose.

The question is, how many of those women are really not "generic women", but unwed mothers. I suspect real, permanent welfare reform will solve the problem.

This female thing may be entirely a red herring.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Her essay begs for that response.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Wow! What a profound response full of facts and logic! You must make your fellow trolls proud.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Random has been posting on pjm for a long time and while I agree with practically nothing he says, his posts are worthwhile and I would not call him a troll.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
I think a lot of the posters are talking quasi-tongue in cheek, but if we have societal breakdown caused by fiscal collapse mixed with unrestrained terror attacks, we are all going to lose the right to vote or have it rendered meaningless. It would be akin to what happened in Old Testament Israel, I imagine. We better start returning to God.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
1 2 3 4 Next View All