Comments on: Why Would Obama Take Such a Risk with KSM?

By: Ron

Ron — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:22:49 +0000

Hey just thought you all like to know, Eric Holder law firm Convington And Burling a law firm in Washington D.C. is defending 17 Yemen Gitmo detainees. Just tought you all know what Eric Holder is all about. What does this say about Obama. Obama picked Eric Holder for that reason. Check it out on the internet.

By: Cybergeezer

Cybergeezer — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:07:43 +0000

82. mr:
as a law abiding loving america and patriotic american muslim you guys are racist, islam rules!!!

Nov 22, 2009 – 7:36 am

U……….suk!

By: wancow

wancow — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:35:32 +0000

I fail to understand how Hirsi Ali wasn’t a refugee, so I simply do not see the parallel with the KSM case. Perhaps it’s in the menutia of Dutch law, but so far as I can tell, a woman who’s condemned to be the property of a husband she did not choose who flees to freedom is, in fact, a refugee.

So far as the rest, I could not agree with you more.

I do believe that Obama will be embarrassed when the case against KSM and his merry band of Jihadists is thrown out of court…

I found it most interesting when I heard the attorney say that they all admitted to their part in 9/11, but would pleed “Not Guilty” in order to have a political forum in court…

Gee…

By: Dark Helmet

Dark Helmet — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:13:42 +0000

obama is a traitor. those around him seek to destroy America. They must…. be stopped. Words mean nothing without the action to back them up.

By: mr

mr — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:36:24 +0000

as a law abiding loving america and patriotic american muslim you guys are racist, islam rules!!!

By: tanstaafl

tanstaafl — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:50:54 +0000

Why is President Obama risking legal disaster? To pay tribute to his extreme left-wing followers? To impress the rest of the world (most non-Americans think the American judicial system is a joke, and the upcoming KSM show is only making it worse)? Is he trying to create chaos? Why? Obama the Un-Decider: the American Idol style of governing "The Obama administration’s approach to the 9/11 trials is emblematic of what you might call Obama’s egalitarian faux-democracy, in which the illusion of responding to every side in a debate undercuts the democratic process of actually arriving at a decision...This illusion of national participation in his decision-making process, with the promise of a happy ending that excludes no one, has been Obama’s method almost from Day One. Call it the American Idol style of governing—except that no possibility ever gets voted out of the competition."

By: misanthopicus

misanthopicus — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:25:55 +0000

RE # 70/ Sulla:

[...] but the prosecution will more difficult than that of Charles Manson. [...]

… and the monkey wrenches are already flying in the machine:

“Germany Concerned Its Evidence to Be Used to Back Death Penalty in 9/11 Trial” by AP/ Fox News -

Justice Ministry [Germany] spokeswoman Katharina Jahntz on Saturday confirmed a report in Der Spiegel that a German observer would attend the trial to ensure that no evidence provided by Germany would be used to apply the death penalty.

A German government official says the nation will send an observer to the upcoming trial in New York of the professed mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks and four accused henchmen. [...]

more @:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/11/21/germany-concerned-evidence-used-death-penalty-trial/

By: NCBob

NCBob — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:55:37 +0000

Two observations. First, by moving KSM from a military court to a civilian, AG Holder is now in charge of the process. As such, in the last hour of Obama’s only term, he can sell Soros and the Saudi’s a pardon for KSM (as he did for Marc Rich in the last hour of Willie’s term) for, what, 10 to 25 million dollars.
Second, if KSM’s case, a foreign muslim who killed Americans, can be moved from military to civilian court, why can’t Hasan’s case, an AMERICAN muslim who killed Americans also be moved to civilian court?
Holder is as crooked as Obama (and Rangel, Dodd, Murtha, Daley, etc.); why would anyone expect integrity frm either?

By: Paul

Paul — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:40:23 +0000

Ms. DeWinter, herein lies the problem. You are pondering and questioning this issue in the context of your very valid sense of integrity, which, unfortunately, is something pres obama can neither recognize nor truly show evidence thereof in his short political history (nor, probably in his entire life). Coupled with his brazenly unabated determination to undermine the USA and all it has ever stood for, we have before us the “hope and change” only a rogue “wannabe” despot (such as bhobama is) could dream up.

By: seanmahair

seanmahair — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:16:05 +0000

There are several troubling things going on here.

First these terrorists are NOT US citizens. They are enemy combatants, prisoners of war. They do not have access to citizen rights under the Constitution. Therefore they CAN NOT be tried in a civilian court of law.

Second this is typical of this administration. They have already shown they are willing to spit on the Constitution whenever it gets in their way.

Third, these people (the current administration) are radicals…….they and their associates were trained by Saul Arlinsky “Rules for Radicals” and educated and influenced by the likes of William Ayres (co-founder of the Weather Underground). They are domestic terrorist who don’t think enough was done (in the 60′s) to destabilize and demoralize this country.

All of this should come as no surprise from the people who refuse to produce actual evidence (a real birth certificate) to prove the person in the WH is a real citizen of this country. If they don’t have to play by those rules and laws why would they obey any other. I’m not a birther but one wonders why they won’t produce a simple piece of paper to put this all to rest………that arrogance and lack of transparency is at the heart of why they do what they do.