Why the Case Against Huma Abedin Cannot Be Dismissed
This article originally appeared in Human Events.
A CIA/FBI agent was responsible for creating the first al-Qaeda training manual from classified military sources. Ali Mohamed covertly moved up through the ranks undetected until the Egyptian-born al-Qaeda spy was finally discovered. Though arrested in 1998, Mohamed’s whereabouts and legal status remain unknown. Fort Hood jihadist Nidal Malik Hasan benefited from the same faulty screening.
Jordanian-born “reformed” jihadist Humam al-Balawi deceived some anxious CIA agents, promising to deliver al-Qaeda leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri to them. Instead, as he passed their guard, he detonated a suicide belt, killing the agents. We were the first to translate the sinister plan of this Taliban spy, which was missed by the CIA but was advertised on his Arabic website for the whole Arabic world to read:
“When I drive my car at a traffic police station … my surroundings change by a push of a flash button. I will find myself martyred as I drive a booby-trapped truck with a bomb heading towards the pagan guards.…”
Why isn’t the CIA monitoring the Arabic words and connections of these people?
Whether it’s the CIA or the military, sophisticated surveillance is proving inadequate, and proper background checks of Middle Easterners aren’t being done. Each example serves as another case in point. What makes us think that the State Department would update its virus protection program? Even more disconcerting than Mohamed and Balawi is Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s aide and deputy chief of staff Huma Abedin, who has been with Clinton since 1996. She was never properly screened; this will be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt.
To be concerned about Abedin’s access to sensitive information is an issue that will most likely garner unsolicited curses from “sensitive” Americans who are enamored with her. These same people ignore this diva’s familial ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. Lt. Col. Robert Anderson’s detailed reports aimed at getting Army intelligence to investigate Ali Mohamed — and have him court-martialed — were also ignored.
Abedin is even more potentially dangerous: She can leak state secrets. She is closely associated with her Muslim Brotherhood family and even joined Clinton at an event with her mother, Saleha Abedin, at Dar El-Hekma College in Saudi Arabia. Also present was a close associate of Saleha Abedin — Suheir Qureshi. Qureshi’s name later appeared in several prominent Arab newspapers when it was revealed that she belonged to a list of 63 members of the secret arm of the Muslim Brotherhood called The Sisterhood. The full list was later revealed — Huma Abedin’s mother is on it. Huma’s brother — Hassan Abedin — also collaborates with Omar Naseef and Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, two of the most influential terror supporters in the world.
Yet, as detractors argue “guilt by association,” they unwittingly strengthen our case, because this is what the FBI uses when investigating federal employees: “Character. Associates. Reputation. And Loyalty to the United States. (CARL).” This checklist was never applied to Huma Abedin, who still associates with her family. Dismissing all this as “guilt by association” ignores a tough question:
Other than Huma Abedin, has there ever been a case in which a family member who either belonged to the Muslim Brotherhood or was a prominent Islamist did not denounce a Muslim female relative who married a non-Muslim male?
It’s a question with only one answer: Her family made an exception for her because Huma has a higher calling.
Westerners erroneously compare the “Middle East” mindset with that of the “Midwest,” and fail to shift gears to understand the Muslim worldview. They do not comprehend the seriousness of a Muslim “daughter” or “sister” marrying a Jewish male, particularly because the Islamic Shariah Faculty in Kuwait has deemed Huma Abedin’s marriage to a male Jew null and void.
While Westerners portray The Sisterhood as a simple “mule service,” our own detailed research — which will be released shortly — reveals male supervisors as official members along with their wives and/or daughters. The list includes spies who have proudly disclosed their heroic acts during Israel’s wars with Egypt. Others are Nazi-style propagandists, Nazi affiliates from the time of the Brotherhood’s inception, hijab (Muslim head covering and modest styles of dress) advocates in Europe, prominent doctors, popular conspiracy theorists and media icons that closely emulate the Goebbels propaganda machine of Nazi Germany.
The group’s influence spans several international organizations from the United Nations to the United States to women’s advocacy groups worldwide. Its influence is immense. Overlooking this group — and by extension, Huma Abedin — is not dissimilar to ignoring the Able Danger intelligence operation’s revelations about Mohamed Atta prior to 9/11.
The elites think their progeny will be exempt from the follies of their sell-out to our enemies. In the case of the Clintons, this includes both the Chinese and the Saudis. They have no wisdom to look down the generations to when a female Clinton descendent might be seen as priviledged booty for some Caliphate ruler’s Harem, or that Chinese missles, with guidance provided by President Clinton’s treachery and venality, might land on their grandchild’s head.
More to the point, anyone who has educated themself about the mores of Islam would have an immediate gut-check on learning that Huma Abedin’s background includes a Mother who is a member of the Muslim sisterhood, while she herself is married to a Jew.
Taqiyya, anyone?
So that is why Clinton pushes for engagement with the Muslim Brotherhood? Has her aide Huma Abedin been part of that push also?
@ 1 Cali
Hillary pushes for engagement with the Brothers?
That’s not the missionary position, is it?
If she’s on top, the US is safe. No?
Her aide Huma Abedin is part of that push also?
Now you’re getting downright kinky.
Have to read you the Bill of Rights
or is that the Rights of Bill?
I read an expose a few years back that Huma goes everywhere with Hillary…really everywhere. The theory was they are romantically involved.
This would explain (but not excuse) the hijinks of both philandering husbands.
And would make it more likely that HRC is ‘bought’ by radical Islam, if not by cash then by the old sweep honeypot.
The same lack of appreciation for reality that allowed Western intellectuals to express admiration for Final Solutions and provide nuclear secrets to the Soviet Union persists, even flourishes. How many more million screaming deaths will it take before those afflicted with the disease of idealism receive the response they deserve rather than being given our most powerful positions?
At one point in history it was true that “all that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.” But that was a different time. Now, in a world where it is an unquestionable truth that every ounce of flesh that can vote should do so, early and often, all that is necessary is for a few million unthinking cowards to produce an undangling chad.
“Other than Huma Abedin, has there ever been a case in which a family member who either belonged to the Muslim Brotherhood or was a prominent Islamist did not denounce a Muslim female relative who married a non-Muslim male?”
What you mean is, “a Jew”.
Let’s be explicit here. The Saudis are and this fact has pretty well convinced those living in Israel of what’s what here.
Very encouraging article – thank you sincerely. We are at the mercy of a lawless administration that is totally clueless and ignorant of the consequences of allowing Islamism and creeping Sharia into our country…so what to do?
Somebody HAS to hold Obama accountable at some point very soon. WH meetings occur with our enemies’ hands on the table and that’s simply NOT acceptable.
How many Congress men/women are there that say and do NOTHING?? Just thought I’d scare y’all !!!
Have you ever considered that Obama may be a member of the Muslim Brotherhood? Why engage in secret meetings? Why create a fund to channel money to them from the stimulus funds? Why specifically increase the immigration totals for Arabs each year? This man is no fool, he’s evil. I have no problem at all believing that if he is not one of them he is at least in complete agreement with their aims. Why else help his cousin to steal an election in Kenya so that Sharia law could be instituted in a majority Christian country? What we have in Obama is a Manchurian candidate inside of a Trojan horse.
Who would ever think that Hillary Clinton or “Bill” would work to undermine the United States? Next thing you will be telling me is that Bob Rubin, the Clinton US Secretary of the Treasury and now Bilderberg big wig wants to have a hand in choosing our Republican Presidential candidate for 2012.
George Stephanopolous and that old fool, Bob Scheafer tell us that everything is all peachy, so why not just let the same group have a free hand? It has worked so well up to now. What could go wrong?
Hillary Clinton and the “Bill” might be in cahoots with someone who is trying to destroy America? Come on tell me it isn’t so.
Next thing you will try and tell me is that the Clinton Treasury Secretary Bob Rubin, Bilderberg big shot, ex-US Treasury Secretary, Ex Head of Goldman Sachs, and the man who as Citibank Executive Vice Chairman advised Citibank to go big with the subprime mortgages, shouldn’t be allowed to green light our Republican Presidential candidate for 2012.
Come on George Stephanopolis and that old fool, Bob Schafer say it is just peachy to put your lives and freedom in the hands of these people. What could go wrong?
Yes,those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. As in
While England Slept.
My opinion on the matter is that having her close to a senior member of the Executive Branch could actually be an asset, because she can provide raw intelligence by providing encryption cyphers and writing samples from her relatives, if she communicates with them, and it also falls under the “keep you friends close but your enemies closer”
You must be joking.
“…she [Abedin]can provide raw intelligence by providing encryption ciphers and writing samples from her relatives…”
Is it possible that you actually believe that?
“Character. Associates. Reputation. And Loyalty to the United States. (CARL).” This checklist was never applied to Huma Abedin, who still associates with her family.
The same could be said about Obama himself. Absent his political status and connections, there were enough “red flags” in his background and his associations to suggest he could well have been denied security clearance.
Walid Shoebat and Ben Barrack — For what it’s worth, my understanding is that Anthony Weiner is not Jewish by Jewish standards: his mother wasn’t Jewish. Muslims may consider him Jewish, though.
The rest of the article is pretty scary. Guess, this is another time where the Fumbling Bumbling Incompetents (FBI) can’t connect the dots.
Even if muslims don’t consider him a Jew, they still consider him an infidel and that makes him ineligible to be married to a muslim woman . . .unless there is a benefit to islam for such marriage to be allowed.
Under normal circumstances, a woman that marries an infidel man is murdered for dishonoring her family and violating the koran. but she seems to be getting a pass. Not so much as a threat much less any action against her.
This is disconcerting at best.
…it was sHillary that pushed for the war on Libya and she sided with the muslims who were slaughtering Serbs in Bosnia.
many of sHillary’s comments and actions favor muslims. bill and sHillary did tremendous damage to Israel with their one sided peace plan.
it is obvious that one doesn’t need to vet the muslim aid to sHillary since both are subverting the USA.
One word: Wow!
..lol how can anything involving the clintons surprise you !
I believe the Clintons sold out America to foster a “One World” Socialism. They may also have sold their souls to “you-know-who”.
When I first read Huma was a Muslim and then her Mother a member of the “Sisterhood” I questioned how she could marry outside her relegion and inparticular to a Jew. My answer was found in the following:
MUSLIM WOMAN AND NON-MUSLIM MAN:
….. And give not (your daughters) in marriage to
Al-Mushrikun** till they
believe in Allah alone and verily a believing slave is better
than a (free) Mushrik, even though he pleases you….[2:221] **
Al-Mushrikun=>Pagans, idolators, polytheist and disbelievers in
the Oneness of Allah and in His messanger Prophet Muhammad SAW)
- [[6]]
Islam considers the husband head-of-the-family and therefore
requires that a Muslima cannot marry a non-Muslim because she
will be under the authority of a non-muslim husband. He may
prevent her from carrying out her religious obligations by
either pressuring her or physically abusing her. But it is not
the sole reason for imposing the restriction. The situation is
considered very damaging for the woman to practise Islam
afterwards and even worse for the kids in such marriages. There
are NO conditions mentioned under which a Muslim woman IS
allowed to get married or remain married to a non-Muslim husband
after she has accepted Islam. Therefore, even if she has freedom
to practise Islam after marriage, she is NOT allowed to enter
into an inter-faith marriage.
These are very disturbing questions raised in this post. I for one am grateful PJ Media is extending the venue for Shoebat and Barrack to report.
I just read another post at the DAILY CALLER that Obama has given Holder and the DOJ the broader policy descretion he’s been asking for to use his lawyers as first responders when it comes to fighting the war on terror – again the ‘rule of law’ approach.
This latest twist from Obama’s use of Executive Order is by design in direct contrast to how the Bush administration prioritized our national security – Intelligence Agencies working in tandem with the military – or at least limiting the DOJ to appropriate roles such as defining what was and wasn’t torture.
This obsession with making the war on terror increadingly a law and order venue dovetails with what these authors have posted here as well. It well informs the kind of atmosphere where demanding loyalty via fully vetting those in the upper reaches of power is both political and policy anethma – most tragically exhibited with Nadal – and now possibly with a fallen congressional bit bulls wife as well – one who just happens to be a top aid to our Secretary of State.
Rep King of NY standing up to the clownish boors like Rep Richardson on his committee investigations is likewise a part of stories like those these authors share. The desire to brand all such investigations as a racist witch hunts – & OPENLY COMPARING HIS HEARINGS TO THE HOUSE UN-AMERICAN COMMITTEE headed up by McCarthy & Nixon in the 50′s – such attacks by these partisan Democrats attempt to stifle all debate and thus veto any such investigations when it is very clear they are badly needed.
Obama and Clinton pursue the same tactics when it comes to foreign policy.
Given the Arab Spring uprissings, why hasn’t there been more inquiries such as those now undertaken by Shoebat and Barrack? Is the NY Times and the rest of the MSM limited only to a discussion over how much Isreal’s PM and our President can’t stomach one another? And if so, why?
This kind of permissiveness in the media is a crucial element that downplays just how lax Obama is when it comes to National Security. Killing Osama is one thing, but abandoning the kind of intelligence tools that led to his eventual execution is another – and by moving to Holder to ‘investigate’ insures exactly the kind of results desired.
It is exactly the kind of ‘detente’ approach Obama desires; play up the Osama execution but deny to the point of appeasement that a real external threat even exists. Leadership from ‘behind’ that ensures needing no leadership skills at all.
Just as he demured to Nancy Pelosi for a domestic adgenda – he demures to Clinton for any semblance of policy abroad. It comes as no surprise that Clinton is just as reluctant to confront our enemies directly. It has come for what passes as statesmanship in the Progressive camp.
I look forward to these authors as well as others keeping us informed. Lord Knows this administration never will.
Mrs. Weiner is taking one for the team.
Thanks to both authors for this sentence:
…”Would someone have appointed the daughter of Magda and Joseph Goebbels as the deputy chief of staff for Cordell Hull — the U.S. secretary of state during World War II — arguing that she was not a member of the Nazi party?”
From what I read here and there (…the “here” does not apply to PJM…),it’s my guess that most U.S. citizens today have never heard of Cordell Hull, and the Goebbels’…..or Neville Chamberlin….or Joseph Grew. They probably have never heard of successful Soviet subversion, or, jumping back around further….the Zimmermann Telegram.
I simply cannot understand the lack of public interest in our most current …..and…..self-declared enemy….Islam; and what it is exactly that encourages the gross naivete’ in our current State Department and White House….after 11 September, 2001. What does it take?
This must be mass escapism….tripping away from reality…”tweetering” and “chirping” and “liking” this and that trivial celebrity’s drunken contributions to current affairs. Not hare-brained….but bird-brained.
It’s YOUR lives folks….Your childrens’……..
Wake up.
Charlie,
Everything you point out is deliberate. No one who actually knows and understands history can embrace socialism or totalitarianism, no matter if it is called nazi, communist, or islam. When a society puts the education system in the hands of unions (the ultimate in socialists)you get a tweeting bunch of ninnies.
But, they also have accomplices, it was “W”; the great closet liberal who told the nation to, in effect, “go shopping” after 9/11. Only self educated and the families of those who serve or have fallen think about the war daily and see the enemy clearly for what it is.
As for Huma, I’ve posted links to stories about her on every blog I know and encourage everyone else to. Like “gun runner” and “climate gate” the legacy media will try to bury this story for as long as possible.
I believe there is lack of interest/concern here, because it is politically incorrect to mention it. The msm do not mention it. Our current admin. plays appeasement, outreach games. I, too, cannot understand how normally “rational” people do not seem to have common sense when it comes to this. Please, do all that you can do to educate your friends and family. Hopefully, knowledge will spread. You can introduce things gradually i.e. loaning a book you think someone would like “Infidel” by Ayan Hirsi Ali can be a good one to start with. One bit at a time ’til maybe they’ll read the Koran and see for themselves what we’re dealing with.
Does anybody know the exact family background of Huma?
Is she Ismaeli, shia or sunni?
Is she related to Hassan Agha Abedi?
Haven’t we learned that the leftist have been working with the islamists for a long time working on this project? Perhaps Huma is they way by which they coordinate in secret. Code Pink is tight with the brotherhood, is tight with Oby and tight with the clintons. SEIU is tight with the brotherhood and tight with the rest. The head of the AFT, randi Whinegarden is over there right now chatting it up with the brotherhood. Something smells.
Makes Herman Cain look pretty wise after all.
Huma should be investigated but let’s not forget, giving her the third degree is akin to roughing up Hitler’s dog. The real Master Mind is Hillary. Ask Vince Foster or the FBI Agent who wrote the book, or maybe the people in the Military she forced to carry her bags. Let’s not forget how HillaryCare fundamentally changed how you see a Specialist… or the young girl who when out of work was told by The Beast “you look like a smart young lady, you should be able to easily find another job.” Hitlery is an evil force that must be dealt with as well.
PIAPS indeed.
It is becoming more apparent each day that the Left-Islamic alliance is not ideological but racial. It is made up of angry leftist whites and angry Islamicists. The Islamicists seem to be happy to be second class citizens if they gain power over those they hate. They pretend to only care about Allah but they consistently defer to their European masters the same way that the Muslim Brotherhood deferred to Nazi racial theories when they first sought to have a German Alliance. The Palestinians are favored because they are the oldest group to have deferred to Germany through the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem and also because the PLO was originally Marxist.
Although many people would find this far-fetched it does explain why Leftists are quite happy to ignore Islamic oppression of the Left’s usual sacred cows and why both sides are quite happy to ignore the conflicts within the Moslem world (uprisings in Syria, Libya, etc.) Race in the form of self promoting, grievances and victim-hood trumps ideology. It also explains why the alliances breed “hard” and “soft” forms of ideology as well. (“Soft meaning the form of anti-Americanism and anti-Zionism practiced by the Obama administration). The ideology morphs a bit but the players involve remains stable.
The various armies of Gramsci’s “long march though the culture” have conquered their intended targets, the building blocks of our society—the family, religion, education, culture, business, civil institutions, law, and government–and marched victoriously onward, and in their wake have left the wreckage of a vastly changed, poisoned, and distorted landscape.
The have blindfolded us and turned us around to disorient, frighten, and confuse us, and to point us in the wrong direction; so, of course, no one is paying attention to the mounting existential threat to the West and, in particular, to the United States, from Islam and Muslims.
On the one hand, the K-12 educational establishment that Gramsci’s far Left followers spent the last 70 years infiltrating, subverting, and now control, has “dumbed down” or almost entirely stripped out or subverted all of the real education and content, and the key character-forming lessons in morality and patriotism from our schools, and substituted in its place useless twaddle, a therapeutic “everyone is a winner” agenda devoted to making students “feel good about themselves” and not bruising their egos, and plain old propaganda. So that, in general and in many/most places, it increasingly graduates large numbers of barely literate and numerate, soft, very gullible and vulnerable “chumps.” Today’s “graduates” and citizens who have been very deliberately disarmed by denying them the mind-set and tools to be the solidly educated, informed, ethical, aware, patriotic, activist, and effective citizens that our Republic needs if it is to survive—they never studied real History—especially American History, or the Constitution, Economics, Logic, or Rhetoric or Geography, and religion/morality are no longer taught—and, so, they can give you their considered opinion about American Idol, or the latest IPad, and know all about Lady Gaga and Lindsey Lohan, but many/most don’t have a clue as to how our capitalist economy works, they do not know our history, about our Constitution and, especially, about the ideas that animate it and are embodied in it, and they don’t really know how our government is supposed to work or works today, they cannot read or write very well, locate Washington, D.C. or India on a Map, or reason or dissect an argument but, as “graduates” they have an enormous sense of “entitlement,” and most now believe–on some level–that the United States is the source of most, if not all that is wrong in this world.
Starting in the 1970s Obama and Bill Ayers good friend, Columbia’s Professor Edward Said, riding the tsunami of Gramscian Postmodern thought that swept through the Academy, destroyed our very skeptical traditional “Orientalist” school of Middle Eastern experts which had hundreds of years of first hand knowledge and observations that informed its ideas and viewpoint, and with the help of Saudi and other money from Muslim states—$100-200 million and perhaps much, much more in “donations” that over the intervening decades set up numerous new study centers and departments and endowed existing departments, programs, and individual scholars, set up endowed chairs, and funded scholarships to study the Middle East and Islam–Said’s heirs and acolytes produced a new, substitute school of Middle East experts who now exert wide influence over Middle Eastern studies here in the U.S., and these new experts views of the Middle East, Islam, Muhammad, Israel, the Palestinians, the Jihad, and terrorism are now our received knowledge, and it is the graduates from this Saudi influenced Academy that are now our Middle East experts, “experts” who teach classes, develop curriculums and write textbooks, who control hiring, publication, and tenure decisions, issue invitations to speak at conferences, to write papers, and who award honors and commendations, appear on TV, testify before Congress, write influential reports, and are the experts that our government, military and business sectors rely on for advice about the Middle East and Islam.
Couple this with a MSM that has also been infiltrated, subverted, and taken over almost completely by Gramsci’s far left soldiers, a MSM which routinely and radically covers up, distorts, and filters the “news” to create an almost totally fictitious world for its readers and viewers that will further the Left’s agenda and now, the agenda of Islam as well, which has become the Left’s ally of convenience.
For this MSM, Islam is “the religion of Peace,” Muslims are being harassed and profiled and persecuted solely because of their “race” (never mind that neither Muslims nor Islam are a “race”), and the Muslim suicide bombers or terrorists—those few that they have to very reluctantly identify as terrorists—commit their acts of terror because of mental illness, because they are “loners,” because they have “had a run of bad luck” and are “hopeless” and “desperate” (although why this would make someone want to blow up thousands of innocent tourists in Times Square is never addressed), or as a reaction to some injustice that we in the West have perpetrated against Islam and Muslims (but, then, doesn’t this make the terrorist’s status as a Muslim and a follower of Islam and the ideology of Islam itself relevant?), and, so our MSM tells us, neither the fact that the terrorists are Muslims, or the ideology of Islam, or the example of Muhammad has any connection with or is relevant to their acts of terror, and quite often they avoid the issue entirely and write off such terrorist attacks by Muslims as simply, “inexplicable.”
In past ages it was our Christian faith that provided the theological/ideological foundation, the mind-set, the rallying cry, and the religious and military forces that enabled us in the West to fight Islam to a standstill at the battle of Tours, at the Gates of Vienna, at the sea Battle of Lepanto, and again at the Siege of Vienna, but that strong, self-confident, muscular, and militant Christianity, too, has also largely fallen prey to the armies of Gramsci’s “Long March.”
Finally, look at another captive sector of American life that has infiltrated, subverted and is now almost completely dominated by the Gramscian far Left, the “entertainment industry” which tells us–via books, movies, Broadway plays, concerts, music lyrics, TV series and shows, and the Internet–that Muslims are the innocent victims of our ignorant, intolerant, racist, prejudice and paranoia, that Muhammad was a noble being on a “spiritual quest,” and that Islam—along with Judaism and Christianity–is one of the three great Abrahamic Religions, is sacrosanct, and deserves our utmost respect.
In effect, via the almost universally successful Gramscian “long march through the institutions” the forces of the far Left have blindfolded us, and turned us around, to disorient, frighten, and confuse us, and to point us in the wrong direction; so, of course, no one is paying attention to the mounting existential threat to the West and, in particular, to the United States, from Islam and Muslims.
I believe its possible that a woman who works for the United States might also be loyal to the United States. I mean, these things do happen.
Time to closely study the lives of the Clintons before they appeared on the
national stage? During Vietnam War and watergate. WJ as refugee/elite/Rhodes Scholar to Oxford/Oxbridge. Sister to Cambridge,the school and fraternity/secret society for Soviet spies and moles. Some,e.g Philby, Burgess, MacClean, Blunt… all of the “best and brightest”, in high places. H.Rodham Clinton as legal intern at Watergate “investigations”.”Deep Throat” high level administrator in FBI? Washington Post/Pentagon Papers. Subsequent activities of both Clintons while in high office in Arkansas – criminal activities.
Why WJ Clinton as “Democratic” Party candidate to substitute for the remaining Kennedy. Who even the DNC could not chance as candidate after exposure of his true nature. His disrespect and contempt for women and Law,learned with his brothers at the foot of the master the patriarch of the Kennedy Dynasty.
And why the selection of Obama by DNC with his baggage. The charade of Hillary Clinton with her crying for the camera at the loss for the candidacy. She, humiliated through 8 years during WJ’s White House incumbency without a single public tear? To enable the “New Kennedy” a free run to the White House?
And then there is Hillary’s rage at the “Democrats” loss of the Millenium election because of that “vast right-wing conspiracy”. With Nancy Pelosi’s public temper tantrum at that loss, which appears to have been particulary significant to them both. Pelosi’s vows for revenge and remember Pelosi’s triumphant parade, House Speaker gavel raised high after passage by gangster tactics of Obamacare, formerly known as Hillary’s baby.
And think on words on the website dancing czars “We The People” great quotes: of late Roman Cicero:
A nation can survive its fools and even the ambitious
But it cannot survive treason from within.
An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known, and carries
his banner openly.
But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely. His sly
whispers rustling through all the alleys. Heard in the very halls of
government itself.
For the traitor appears not a traitor. He speaks in accents familiar to
his victims, and he wears their face, and their arguments.
He appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men.
He rots the soul of the nation.
He works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of
the city.
He infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist.
A murderer is less to fear.
The traitor is the plague.
Of course, the case against Huma Abedin (and Hillary Clinton, and Bill Clinton, too, who actually married Huma Abedin to Anthony Weiner, though that isn’t a crime under our legal system — assuming that disbarred Bill Clinton is somehow or other licensed to do so — although it probably isn’t kosher under Sharia law) should not under any circumstances be dismissed, but, alas, it has been thoroughly dismissed already.
And so what? Does anyone here imagine that anyone else out there might even understand what this is all about, if it were actually brought to their attention? Personally, from past experience, I can think of a good many old, longtime friends and acquaintances who wouldn’t have a clue, and, much worse than that, at this late date not even for a minute wonder why they hadn’t heard about it until I just now told them!