Get PJ Media on your Apple

Why Romney’s Right: Many Cheap Ships Safer Than Few Expensive Ones

With a smaller fleet, losing just one of our technological marvels is a crippling security blow and too much risk. Related: Horses and Bayonets

by
Bob Owens

Bio

October 23, 2012 - 8:33 am
<- Prev  Page 3 of 3   View as Single Page

We’ve created a Navy that is “too big to fail,” in terms of the importance and capital investment we’ve placed on just eleven ships — an incredibly short-sighted position. We’ve made similarly bad investments in the gee-whiz technology of the F-22 Raptor, where every accident or combat loss costs $150 million each, and the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, which will cost (if they are ever fielded) as much as a quarter-billion dollars each to replace for the Navy and Marine versions. We’re creating planes and ships that are too expensive to risk losing in combat. These technological marvels are backed by systems and support elements that are 50 years old, being used by the grandchildren of the men that built and used them.

It’s absurd.

What Mitt Romney has proposed is a shift in our way of thinking about the military that a community organizer simply can’t grasp.

Romney has proposed a Navy of lighter, more numerous, less expensive, and more deployable multiple-role ships that can be better geographically dispersed around the globe to more quickly respond to need, instead of having less than a dozen carrier strike groups chasing problems around the world.

Romney’s plan to use COTS (commercial off the shelf) technologies across the entire military may not be as sexy as spending billions to mount futuristic lasers and rail-guns on ships, but what it will do is put more ships and sailors on the water.

It’s a stunning turnaround offered by one of America’s best turnaround artists. Romney proposes to toss the bureaucratic dead-weight out of the military, out of the Pentagon, and replace them with real war-fighters and practical weapons.

Against this sound advice, Obama offers only quips.

I think we all know who sounds more presidential.

Also read:

A Unicorn is Just a Horse with a Bayonet

Horses and Bayonets: Another Meme That Does Not Mean What They Think it Means

<- Prev  Page 3 of 3   View as Single Page
Bob Owens blogs at Bob-Owens.com.
Click here to view the 144 legacy comments

Comments are closed.

One Trackback to “Why Romney’s Right: Many Cheap Ships Safer Than Few Expensive Ones”