Why Not Herman Cain?
The word on the street among the right’s intelligentsia and punditocracy is that Herman Cain cannot, should not, and will not be the Republican nominee for president in 2012.
Hmmm.
Now, dear readers, those “never-will-happen,” 100%-certain predictions made by mere mortals — and there seem to be more and more of them these days — just remind me of weatherman goofs.
You know what I’m talking about. “There’s a 0% chance of rain here today”; it’s raining cats and dogs right out your window. “There’s a 100% ‘probability’ that this hurricane will hit the east coast of Florida by evening tomorrow”; hurricane fill-in-the-blank hits west coast of Florida where all the east coast residents have been moved during evacuations.
Weather is a far more exact science, however, than predicting human behavior.
And one would really need to be a ninny living under a rock in the San Fran Bay not to know by now that we have entered a new era in American politics, where the unpredictable, unlikely, unforeseen anomaly is becoming a new rule of sorts.
The triumph of Barack Obama against one of the most far-reaching, most powerful political machines in American history — the Clintons — ought to have awoken political insiders to the new reality. But if they were sound sleepers, then the rise of the middle-class, grassroots tea party movement ought to have been like a million roosters crowing at dawn, enough to awaken all but the dead-as-doornails beltway folks. Nothing — absolutely nothing — in American politics is predictable using the old rule book. Not anymore.
So when a proven American businessman like Herman Cain arises and runs for president, dissing his chances is downright dimwitted. If the politicos are right and 2012 will be all “It’s the economy stupid,” then the voice of exemplary free-enterprise success might be the most appealing one in a room full of nothing else but polished, professional, mealy-mouthed politicians.
In the first Republican presidential debate last week, Cain blasted out the response that should have been headline news from coast to coast. When asked about his nonexistent public-office resume — and how he might win the presidency having never won an election — Cain quickly and authoritatively parried: “Everyone in Washington has held public office before. How’s that working out for you?” A slam dunk, if there ever was one.
I would not ever want to be caught in a woodshed facing off against Herman Cain.
Herman Cain speaks, and people who’ve never even heard of him stand up spontaneously and applaud. Many actually cry in gratitude for the authoritative voice of experience Herman brings to every audience. There was good reason for Ed Morrissey to report on Cain’s CPAC speech as the one that “stole the show.”
So why not Herman Cain for president?
Before I go further down this road, some full disclosure. No, I don’t work for Herman Cain. I don’t know him personally either. However, I have loved Herman Cain since the first time I heard him on radio, many years ago now. I have heard Cain verbally eviscerate “African-American” poor-mouth callers in a way that surely made them hope no one they knew was listening.
Herman Cain is an Atlanta guy; I’m an Atlanta gal. Herman Cain has been married to the same woman his entire adult life and is a family man if there ever was one. I’m Cain’s lifelong-married female societal counterpart. I relate to Herman Cain as though he were my next door neighbor in the other America — where monogamy still thrives and kids still mind their manners and the adults still stick together and raise future citizens who don’t end up costing their neighbors a wad in legal and welfare expenses.
Herman Cain is — through and through — the kind of guy you would trust with your last dollar. He’s so honest and so courageous that he has referred to himself as “the dark-horse candidate” — with a smile that could charm the hide off an ornery gator.
Cain’s outspoken love for America is so scary to the left that they’ve already hurled vicious racist epithets at him. There’s nothing for which the Marxists have less tolerance than a black man not willing to remain on the Democrats’ plantation. I daresay that a black man, courageously standing publicly for American free enterprise and individual meritocracy, is even scarier to the left than a rising Mama Grizzly.
But the Marxist, racialist-solidarity card played against Herman Cain is like putty in this man’s hands. I’ve seen him fight back against this leftist canard with a vengeance. Calling Herman Cain a “garbage pail kid” or a “monkey in the window” disgraces the writers, not Cain. And Cain does not — thank God! — take this sitting down or by returning to the back of the bus. (Please do yourself a favor and follow that link to Herman Cain’s pitch-perfect response.)
Eric “justice for my people only” Holder won’t find a “coward” on race in Herman Cain. Cain has not only more melanin in his skin than either Holder or Obama. He has the genuine black American experience in spades, no racist pun intended. While Obama and Holder were attending posh schools and being fawned over by white liberals, taking advantage of affirmative action programs every step of the way, Herman Cain was moving up and out the hard way, the all-American way.
Herman Cain was born in Atlanta in 1945. Think about that for a minute, dear readers. 1945. I was born in Atlanta in 1951. I know a whole lot about what life was like down South under Jim Crow. I’m six years younger than Herman Cain and I still remember vividly the “White” and “Colored” signs that adorned water fountains in the parks and restrooms in every town south of the Mason-Dixon line. I still remember segregated movie theaters, where black audiences were consigned to balcony seating with a back-door entrance, and where “Whites Only” everything, from lunch counters to hotels to Laundromats, reigned supreme.
If a white woman like me remembers these things with shame, how do you suppose Herman Cain remembers them? With justified pride — that’s how. Cain took injustice lemons and turned them into more sweet-tasting, entrepreneurial lemonade — for himself, his family, his community, and more American workers — than you could shake a stick at. And, all the while, he was smiling and singing God Bless America! Fundamentally change America? Not while Herman Cain is standing watch. He knows hard work still pays in America. And he will fight to preserve that opportunity for our posterity.
Herman Cain came from a solid, middle-class black family of the kind that once made up the vast majority of black American families. Even under Jim Crow, families like Cain’s (and Condoleezza Rice’s) flowered in segregated enclaves identical to their white counterparts. Black moms, dads and kids living under the same roof, all working hard under an unfair, completely lopsided system that was in place long before they were born. But unlike their modern set of racialist peers, these exemplary black Americans did not become resentful, angry, or vengeful. Instead, they used their newly attained civil rights to rise to the top — like the cream they always were.
Cain has literally wowed every single audience in every single venue where he has appeared. Cain has personally spoken at more than 40 tea party rallies. He comes across as the embodiment of American spirit. Perhaps, this love-America attitude in a modern black man is so rare that when it emanates from Herman Cain, it literally knocks people off their feet.
Or perhaps Herman Cain has the kind of fire in his belly which can only come from God? Who knows. What mortal among us can accurately define a person’s resonance with masses of other human beings, at a split moment in history’s march?
One thing I do know for sure. I would pay huge bucks for the privilege of seeing Herman Cain face off — mano a mano — with the adolescent “first black president.” Cain vs. Obama? Whoa. Now, that would be something. My intuition tells me that this historical face-off would be Obama’s first woodshed experience.
Obama could continue to call himself the “first black president” — and Herman Cain could take the title of “first genuine American black president.”
Sounds pretty good to this old Atlanta white gal.
Go Herman!! Knock their everlivin’ socks off, honey!
Also: The Tatler/PJTV meets up with Herman Cain in Texas Friday morning.






I for one and digging Cain as a candidate. He’s also tacticly sound.
I keep thinking back to when I first heard Herman Cain speak (in a YouTube video), and also back to the focus group’s response after the first GOP debate in SC. As more people become aware of Herman Cain, the more support he’ll garner. As for the Lefty flack he’s taking, the harder they hit him, the more noise it’ll make. As the saying goes, there’s no such thing as bad publicity, not for this man, at least. =^[.]^=
Finally, the readers in this forum are getting it right. If you don’t think Obama is doing a good job, find a reasonable opposing candidate that is sound in his views and projections for the future of America, rather than support idiocies like Donald Trump, Sarah Palin, or Michele Bachmann. I believe Herman Cain is that man.
I heard him for the first time in the GOP debate then played his CPAC speech. It’s a year before I vote in a primary, but if I was voting today it would be for Cain. I would almost pity the poor Democrat who had to debate him.
“So why not Herman Cain for president?”
Because if he’s just a country club republican with an other then usual skin color, he’s not the man we need.
We need a flat tax that will cut against the politically and economically privileged as much as we need an end path for entitlement programs. We need the end of crony capitalism, we need to end up at a tax code not more than a few hundred pages long, and a personal return that goes on a postcard, with no loopholes. Everyone’s dollar treated equally regardless of how many you’re making, and no subsidies for businesses anymore than for poor behavior socially. We need an end to the war in recreational drugs. We need an end promptly to Obamacare. If there will be any involvement for even one more minute of the feds in education, it needs to be vouchers only–gut the DoEd for the next several years and then end it.
And we need someone who understand that making these changes too quickly will tank the economy as much as the debt bomb will.
I haven’t heard Cain say the things that make him that guy.
Tom maybe you’r not listening to Herman. I will vote for him if he is the repus choice to run against obummer. I would dearly love to see him and the great orator face off in a debate, he’d wipe the floor with that phony tramp,
Tom Perkins is not paying attention to Herman Cain if he does not realize that Herman Cain is for the FairTax, which IS a FLAT TAX. And Herman Cain is also known for defeating Bill Clinton in a debate about Gov’t run health Care, so if Tom is interested in Tax Code reform, (elimination of the tax code under the FairTax in this case) and he is for repealing ObamaCare, then Herman Cain is the ONLY guy in the race.
The FAIRTax is not fair, neither is it neccessarily flat. It is a tax on spending and not income, so the wealthy can avoid it far easier than can the poor. To make it class neutral and not regressive, you end up with a complicated and too easily expandable set of laws/agencies which amount to creating transfer payments aimed at evening it out. The Democrats will grow that.
An income tax is income neutral, and can be truly a flat tax which is neither progressive and regressive.
If he’s for the (un)FAIRTax, I ain’t voting for him.
Tom, have you really looked at FairTax.org? I don’t want to hijack this thread but there are compensating mechanisms built in so that the lower income households specifically do NOT get a disproportionate burden of the tax. You could simply avoid paying any federal tax at all under the FairTax by buying used non-food items and collecting the prebate to offset the tax imposed for those you can’t avoid.
You think the wealthy can’t avoid a “tax on income”? They are experts at doing just that under the current system. We don’t tax wealth (i.e. net worth) in this country because it is too hard and too invasive to determine what each person’s net worth might be. At least with a tax on personal spending, those who actually want to use their wealth to their own benefit will pay tax accordingly. And if it replaces business tax then we will be more competitive globally and more jobs will be created.
Geeze,
I agree with you in principal on the spending tax, but I dont trust the government enough to ever let them try it, and here’s why:
There can, for obvious administrative reasons, be no possible way to create a new system where we can essentially say “OK, on next Tuesday, we throw one switch ON, and simultaneously turn one valve OFF”. Its just not possible to do that with a revenue stream. There will have to be some type of a “transition”..
And that “transition” will absolutely be, the implimentation of a NEW Federal Sales Tax, WHILE our Federal Witholding (income) tax obligations are STILL in place…
The lie they use get this new, additional tax placed upon us will be:
“Dont worry, we assure you, as soon as revenue is generated to replace it, the other will be phased out..”
To which I say: “BULLSHIT!”
Federal Witholding (income) tax will never, EVER go away, it will never ever be “replaced”…there absolutely WILL be some artificial excuse, some outright bald face LIE created by them, to keep the Federal Witholding (income) Tax in place, NO MATTER HOW MUCH REVENUE A NEW FEDERAL SALES TAX GENERATES.
We will be stuck with BOTH, forever, and they will LAUGH at us for being so gullable….again.
In a Perfect World, maybe we SHOULD have a Federal sales tax in stead of an income tax.
In a Perfect World, maybe we SHOULD fund local schools with a State Income Tax, rather than County Property Taxes….
But its too late now, so never, NEVER EVER allow them to even try playing with a new type of tax…
They absolutely WILL screw us to death with additional, perpetual NEW taxes, while NEVER cutting the strings on the old one. Its just not possible for them to do…their appetite for money is insatiiable, and their integrity is non existant.
Put it this way:
Ever see a bridge or toll road take DOWN the Toll Booths, after the project was paid for, just like they promised?
“OMG! Can you BELIEVE something came up, and they need to STAY!?
OMG! We have to RAISE the tolls too!?, Gosh darn, sorry folks, but this increadibe set of unique cicrumstances suddenly came up and, WHEW, lucky it wasnt even WORSE!”
Dont. Be. Stupid.
Every WORD they say is a lie, including “and” and “the”
Any new TYPE of tax, will become an ADDITIONAL tax.
Since I can’t reply directly to root’s comment, I’m doing it here: Why does there need to be a transition period? Why can’t we just say, “Effective January 1, all Federal withholding will cease and henceforth there will be no income tax. Also effective January 1, a 23% revenue tax will be applied to all new goods sold that were not in stock on December 31. Businesses and individuals will file their final income tax returns on or before April 15 to settle accounts with regard to the defunct Federal Income Tax.” No transition is necessary, except to give people notice of the changes and how they will be enacted.
Myth Buster,
Not sure where in the string this will show up.
But to answer your question about why the need for a “transition”:
The Govenment is huge, with millions of employees. Whoever is in the “withholding tax” fifedom, their departments, supervisors, thieves and slushfunders, cannot be instantly transported somewhere else…they are to deeply embedded to be pulled out.
Nor can they be “trained” for any extra “new” responsibilities while still “operating” the current system they are connected to (have you ever dealt with Government workers before?)
The only possiblity is that they will build a NEW tax revenue counting agency , as large or, most likely larger than the current one. They will fund it with DEBT, while the two exist side by side, in anticipation of alleged day of “the big switch”.
When that day comes, there will be TWO agencies, fully staffed and equipped with forever jobs and lifetime paid retirement expectations, and the “Union Donations” to re-enforce their administrative/political clout to STAY.
On the day of “the switch”, the Income tax people will certainly not be dismissed. There will be, quite simply, blood from spurting stones that can float in mid-air before, any Federal Goverment employee’s job is eliminated.
You know this.
The “unexpected deficit” that was racked up in the creation of the new unfunded agency will be the excuse to KEEP BOTH OPEN “just until the Bridge is paid for”
Same old story, come on.
The new taxes generated will simply be the “food” that the new agency lives on, and they will do so, forever.
Its really quite simple.
Lend a junkie a needle, see what happens.
Parole child rapists, see what happens
Create a nex tax, see what happens
Re-wrote that sentence so many times, I botched it anyway…
Seething contempt affects my typing and proofreading skills:
My thoughts on the chances of ever firing a Federal Employee should say.
“There will be, quite simply, blood spurting from stones that can float in mid-air, before any Federal employee’s job is ever eliminated”
Root,
I know this is a very delayed post, but I need to comment to get this off my chest.
You say “you can’t just shut them down, they’re too deep rooted…”
I say, “watch me pull the plug.” Shut off the power, turn off the generators, and haul out the computers. Done. The dems would shut down the military in this manner if they could do so without starting a revolution.
The Fair Tax IS the way to go. If someone lives the lifestyle of the rich and famous, they will pay tax on all those expensive things. If they do not spend their money, then they just reinvest it to make more money. This leads to greater capital formation.
There are just so MANY benefits to a Fair Tax, that one could write a book about it. Oh, wait. They did.
Let me give you an example of just one benefit. Right now, CEO benefits like a corporate jet, are untaxed income. With a national sales tax, they’d pay more to buy the jet, the fuel for said jet would be taxed, as would all the perks on the jet. Suddenly, CEO’s might prefer to get their benefits in cash. This again leads to either greater spending, or greater capital formation, and greater tax revenues.
It is important that it be done via a Constitutional Amendment. Repeal the 16th Amendment and make the National Sales Tax the only domestic tax. Ban property taxes, capital gains, employment taxes, the works. Only leave tariffs and suchlike.
Then you have not been listening. He is for the Fairtax HR25 S 13
You need to watch him more close my friend. He is a proponent of the National Retails Sales Tax, which abolishes the IRS and takes power away from the beltway and puts it in your hands. He is a breath of fresh air. He is someone who is not afraid to say I do not know the answer to that question, or I refuse to give you the canned response and I would rather make an informed decision that tell something politically expedient. Herman Cain is the right candidate for the job. He has plenty more real world experience than the HDWIC right now.
I’m just not seeing what all the fuss is about over Herman Cain. I think the amount of leg-tingling going on over him does not equal the quality of his debate answers. Seems his standard answer to most every question is: “I’ll identify the problem, surround myself with the best advisors, and then apply the correct solution.” I do hope race is left out of any decision to vote for him. I hope no one votes for him just to prove – perhaps for the second time – that they are not racist. I do believe, however, Mr. Cain would make an excellent Sec of Commerce, as I much admire his business acumen.
I have not decided yet who I support for President next year. Still need to learn more about the candidates.
But, the more I hear of Herman Cain and the more I hear about him, the more I like him.
Mr. Cain is a leader…pure and simple.
How about a Cain/Christie pairing? Two strong Americans!
Awesome idea! Between the two of them, we can have more bailouts, government takeover of banking, *and* cap-and-trade! Genius.
Not.
Christie when all is said and done, is not a Conservative. I’m sure some would argue that but thats my opinion. I would like to see something like a Cain/Bachmann ticket, Cain/West, Bachmann/Cain, Cain/Palin, Daniels/Cain, Cain/Ryan.
If we as Republicans run another RINO (Gingrich, Romney) we will either have another 4 years of this usurping muslim marxist in the oval office with no concern about having to be re-elected, or a republican that also likes this “one world governance” nonsense.
Elect Herman Cain POTUS, and he would probably be smart enough to put Christie in charge of dismantling and State-ifying the Dept. of Education. DONE. Then put him in charge of ending the NLRB and all associated functions of federal government.
Its a double edges sword, and thats why politics sucks.
I grew up in Jersey…its hard core Machine Politics state…unions, teachers, leftest media, government workers, minorities warehoused in Democrat cities full of voter fraud and enough successful “guilty liberals” working in Manhatten all create the perfect storm for Democrats, every election.
No “real” Republican can ever be elected….
Hell, even Abraham Lincon never carried the state.
Its tragic.
The best we can ever do is, when things are REALLY catastrophic (Jim Florio, Jon Corsine) is get a Rino or Rino-lite in office (Whitman, Christie) and coat-tail an extra Republican two into national offices, to help shift the power base in DC, and gain comittee leaderships where these Rinos can be (hopefully) marginalized within the greater GOP
It sucks….and it never helps the people in NJ…,
But its either a Rino or a full-on leftist commie Democrat from Jersey.
Its a lose, or LOSE REAL BAD proposition.
Why I hate politics…
And why I left Jersey.
On the one hand I agree with RivRider above, and haven’t fully invested in any one candidate yet.
On the other hand, and being bluntly honest, I’d love to see the lefties froth at the mouth as they realize they have to place their teleprompter-reading half-black charlatan up against a real, intelligent, conservative black man. They’d probably go off the deep end with the “Oreo” invective, and that’s highly likely to turn the vast sea of non-political-wonks out there off.
Herman Cain sounds good, looks presidential and appears to have the prerequisite private sector experience. Unfortunately, with the American experience of already having “the first black president” in office, an unmitigated disaster, many people (ironically!) won’t vote for another black person.
Most people on the right aren’t anti-Obama because of skin color; they despise his socialist policies and his denigration of America. Maybe Cain is, in fact, the antithesis of Obama (I sure hope so!), but to many Americans who voted for Obama based only on skin color, Cain may appear to be just another ambitious black guy looking for power and money on the white folks’ gullibility.
Buyer’s remorse of a sort could be a factor as far as independents are concerned, but not for those who actually pay attention. Herman Cain as as far removed from Barack Obama as Bernie Sanders is from Ron Paul where it counts — his vision for America.
I am an independent, but didn’t vote for the anointed one, I wrote in Ron Paul and have done so a few times in the past. Those who voted for Obama because of color will do so again, because they share his socialist mentality. All Obama voters who claim to have remorse are lying, they are all democrats whether they say so or claim to be independents. As for me I will vote for Cain, but not if he chooses Christie or one of the other Rinos. I like a Cain/Palin, Cain/Bachmann ticket. Again I ask why is nobody suggesting Jan Brewer of AZ for president or vice president?
Herman Cain / Alan West !
This is a bunch of crap. The “Americans won’t vote for another black guy” crap. If it is Cain vs. Obama, Americans WILL either be voting for the black guy socialist (Obama) or the black guy capitalist (Cain) who loves America and knows how to run a business.
We can’t defeat a guy who is black because we have a candidate who is black?
Is Obama running as a white guy in 2012? If you are correct he would have to be to get re-elected.
So they ARE going to vote for “Man Caused Disaster” Obama, who is black, when you are also saying they are not going to vote for another black guy? But that includes Obama.
So a black guy can’t be elected because people don’t want another black guy but they will vote for Obama instead, who is black? I think the people are tired of the socialist marxism of Obama, not his skin color.
Rebel: My point is that the right wing will vote against Obama based on his Marxism and anti-American point of view; the left wing will vote for Obama based on skin color. The left won’t, however, vote for a conservative black man (look at how they denigrate Clarence Thomas et al).
There are two forces at play: one side (the left) votes on race and “feelings”, the other side (the right) is more pragmatic and votes on policy, experience and economics. Whoever gets the Republican nomination will get elected UNLESS another RINO (like McCain) runs. That would ensure another democrat party victory in 2012 for Obama. Yuck!
If Cain gets the GOP nomination, Obama will probably run on his white half. Then they can run a reverse racist campaign. Otherwise he’ll have to run on his record, and he doesn’t want to do that, it’s a sure loser.
I think people are sick and tired of being called racist, and will vote in such a way that they won’t have to listen to that anymore.
The question is which black man will the black population vote for?
A candidate that gives them $ or one that gives them a foundation to earn $.
The one who gives them $.
Also, the one who’s young and cool and invites rappers to the White House and shoots hoops and sheds his educated English for Ebonics in time for a speech at Birmingham. I can hear them calling Cain a “Tom” for hanging out with all the “bigots” on the right.
If I have to choose between Cain and Palin, it’ll be tough. Cain/Palin 2012?
We don’t have to win the black vote; just getting 20% instead of less than 10% would be a crippling blow that the Democrats couldn’t recover from.
Could be…
They are what, 12-15% of the country? Vote as a block but mostly in cities to skew the electorals. My state of Pennsylvania was “all red” against Obama, except for Philly, Harrisburg, and Pittsburg.
Kinda like the national map…looked like the only “blue” was east/west coastal libs, and Detroit. But its enough to carry individual states, one at a time.
Getting half, or even a third of that block would be a big difference.
So, pretend that Obama is orange and Cain is purple, then, finally, consider their ideas already. Geez, I guess we need to find out what brand of beer they drink, too… No wonder our Republic is tottering on the brink of oblivion! S’cuse me while I grab another sound bite… At least the Golden Goose is nearly dead- this crap is about ever, one way or t’other, I just wish it could be because we woke up and acted like adults, paid as we go, and quit living on other peoples’ money. Any bets? Work for the best, and prepare for the worst…
Run, Herman, Run!
I think all your concerns would generally fall to zero with every such voter, as soon as they hear him speak in person. The response of that Luntz focus group in SC is not an anomaly. People in general are YEARNING for someone like Herman Cain to talk like does and LEAD like he can. He is a LEADER like 0bama never was, and that will make all the difference for the average voter — even the squishy moderates.
I may be WAY off base here, and if so I profusely apologize, but haven’t you posted that same type of comment in many threads about Cain?
I feel its a false fear UNLESS a voter ONLY cares about skin color.
again, if I am wrong I am sorry.
reply was for DavidMac not sure if it looked that way in thread.
If I were to vote today it would be Cain. I am so tired of the RINO’s and their way of running. This is a man who has real experience in the real world. I am from AZ and left the Republican party when it went with Mc Cain. What a mess he is and we have the results to prove it.
Cain has the bona fides of a Libertarian orator. Along with Sowell, Williams and West he gives the lie to the liberal American myths. God bless him.
Cain is a libertarian? I just threw up in my mouth. Cain just wants a slightly different big government than we have now, that’s all.
Ya know, Scandi, you sure have a lotta negative things to say about Herman Cain, without specifying (let alone documenting) a single one.
I’m just gonna go out on a limb and guess that you support Ron Paul, amiright? =^[.]^=
Successful businessman, family man in a long term marriage, civic minded and active in local and state politics, patriotic and is an honest, plain spoken advocate of fiscal responsibility.
Everything is the history of Cain’s lifelong relationships and personal endeavors is an open, nothing to hide, history of a God fearing, hard working faithful family man and fair employer.
We have a slew of politicians, including the President in Washing, D.C. who cannot claim the same.
I don’t know which expression I hate more: “San Fran” or “Frisco.”
Dont care what you call it….
as long as its swept out to sea, or buried under rubble.
I hate the PEOPLE in that city, not the name of the place.
Commie retards by any other name, are still commie retards
And my sincere apologies to the parents of all Gods children born with special needs…
I didnt mean to insult the innocent, by comparing them to that wretched Califonia Disease of Liberalism.
I am with Root on this. You cannot EVER give our government a new tax or an increase in an old tax if you EVER want to stop the growth of government. Our Government is a malignant cancerous tumor on our entire society. It has metastasized and the prognosis for ALL of us is to be consumed. ONLY intense radiation therapy can possibly help at this point, I says.
John Costa has a very long biography of Cain at NR. Here’s the link:
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/267029/introducing-herman-cain-robert-costa
While Mr. Cain sounds good, I agree with those who are reluctant to commit without knowing more about him.
So he’s a clever patriot from Atlanta who’s not afraid of race. Why would he be so wishy-washy on ObamaCare when it’s a complete no-brainer?
In my opinion the only difference in Demoncrats and Repubocrites is that the Demoncrats will destroy America faster. It’s like pulling off a band aide quickly or slowly. Both open the sore. (Karl)
TENO’S THOUGHTS
Settling for the lesser evil is exactly why we keep getting worse and worse candidates. If we will settle for someone who appears just one step to the right of liberal Democrats, that’s all the Republicans will ever offer us. We will NEVER get any better if we continue to support lesser evils.
We’re accountable for whom we vote, not for who wins. The results are up to God; our job is to DO RIGHT.
Every vote for a godly candidate is a vote for a godly candidate, no matter who wins.
If you vote for pseudo-conservative then YOU are responsible for purposely voting them into office. If you vote for a godly candidate you are responsible for supporting a godly candidate, no matter who wins.
We don’t even have to have our candidate win to accomplish much importance. All that’s needed is for Christians to stop throwing away their votes on lukewarm frauds and vote only for godly candidates. That’s what will make those parties viable. If Christians stop voting for moderate/liberal fakers, the 3rd party candidates would get enough votes to at least force the GOP to run honest conservatives if they want to win. The problem is simply that Christians won’t stand for righteousness. They want to support a “winner”, even if that winner is 75% liberal. So long as the other guy is 90% liberal, they think they’re doing well.
If Republicans were the answer, America should be a virtual Eden by now.
That’s not to say Democrats are the answer, but they are at least honest about being liberals and socialistic. The GOP has had plenty of chances, but there are not enough truly conservative Republicans.
If you vote for a pseudo-conservative you actually have voted for a loser. Christians have gotten so far away from God’s word that they no longer have a clue of what winning and losing is. Winning is doing RIGHT, no matter what. Compromise is LOSING.
I’m not concerned with being a majority. I’m concerned with being RIGHT. I’d rather be in the minority and be RIGHT. I’d rather vote for a godly “loser” than an ungodly “winner”.
We need to SPEAK UP and vote for politicians who will not compromise. I’d rather vote for a loser than vote for a winner who won’t deliver on why I voted for him.
Democrats and Republicans are two wings of a bird flying the WRONG way!
I could quibble with the finer points of logic, but the overall thrust of your message is great!
A “godly candidate”? Really? Like Bush? He is devout. His SoCon credentials are absolutely impeccable. Maybe you mean Huckabee? He’s a preacher, and a damned fine one. All the Republican candidates in the last election were “godly men”. Many Conservative Democrats are “godly” church-going types, too. Carter is extremely devout. Yeah, that worked out well.
It is not about godliness. That provides the moral foundation and is of great importance, but one has to be able to translate that into one’s politics. Alan Keyes was best at that, but he was a flamethrower and lacked executive experience. There is more than just godliness. A good man can still get it very wrong.
Reagan got it right with his “three-legged stool” concept.
“Why not Herman Cain?”
I like him! I think I’ll stick with him and throw my support behind him. What the heck…Cain’s da man!
There’s a couple of little things that have made me a Cain fan. They probably don’t count for much in the Grand Scheme of things but… He has a REAL Sense of Humor. With an honest laugh that he is not embarrassed to let loose at himself or the political scene. No ‘Joke Writers’. His humor is easy, honest unforced and appropriate. Next. I have said for years that if I ever saw another Politician trying to be ‘Folksy’ with that ‘no jacket, loosened tie, open collar and rolled up sleeves look’, I was gonna gag! Well I’ve been gagging a lot these past few years. but Herman isn’t afraid to appear in public or on camera in a sport /polo shirt. And give the impression of being truly relaxed and comfortable with himself no matter the surroundings. Both of these ‘Little Things’ speak volumes to me about the ‘MAN’ Herman Cain is. And makes the comparisons to all of the others, from BOTH parties look like cardboard-media-ads. i.e. “VOTE FOR ME, New & Improved, Buy One Get One FREE, Now With INTEGRITY!!! etc.etc……….
So you’re taking the Democratic approach that got us Obama: treat the Presidential race like some giant version of American Idol?
Yes we already have the proper message. our problem is delivery and reception. NOBODY wants an old stuffypants…we can argue about facts and figures and message all day. but the simple truth of human nature is perception is everything. a hot dumb chick will win out over a fugly smart one every time. Obamas campaign was PERFECT. little real substance lots of flash. he chose NO specifics because if he had he could easily be nailed. Like i said we have the truth and the truly right message. our problem is delivery and perception. we can argue about if we like it or not, or we can use strategies what we learned from the oabma campaign and win. HC would be a great asset. as he could not be called racist. sure they would use ‘uncle tom’ but HC would have alot easier time combating that than racis and old stuffy white dude. Paul has no chance. I like him but there is none. he is too well known as a off shoot candidate, too marginalized. as is Palin. and trump is a joke. HC has the business sense of trump, as well as the ability to stand up and tell the libs to shut the F up. he is conservative ( not perfect), he is black ()and not nearly as devisive as palin.again im thinking tactically here which is what we need to do or we WILL loose to obama again and there will be nothing to stop him. think tactics not ideology
Mr. Cain is not a professional politician. He has no political resume to speak of. All he has is a proven record of success and leadership in the private sector, a long and apparently successful marriage, and a testimony of God, country and family. Unlike the current occupant of the White House Mr. Cain has actually lived the life of an American of African ancestry. He has experienced some of the worst as well as much of the best that this nation has to offer. He professes conservative (i.e.- classical liberal) American values. From what I know of his history has also done his best to live these.
We have suffered rule under professional politicians for decades and the nation is now on the brink of ruin. If ever there was a time when leaders were needed who will act for the good of the nation and not of their party or with a view solely to reelection it is now.
Similar to OldSoldier @3, I had to find Herman Cain’s CPAC speech shortly after hearing the Fox debate. While I’ll still need to learn more before making him my top choice for 2012, those two were enough to take Mr. Cain from the ranks of an obscure potential candidate that I’d only vaguely heard about to my top tier of choices for President.
the problem with herman cain is not political. it is medical. in 2006 he was diagnosed with colon cancer metastatic to the liver. (he calls it stage 4. i call it modified duke’s D.) he is still alive and currently seems to be disease free.
i have lived through presidents resigning, being impeached, assassinated, shot but not killed, the gore-bush court fights, the liberal hatred of W. and the devisiveness of obama. i really do not want to sit through the rotting of a president if i can avoid it.
cain for cabinet, yes. president. sorry.
In these times, that’s no reason not to run. He is a man who can shift the political calculation, and more than anything else, that’s what is needed. That and the sense of cohesion a strong personality brings.
If he is not elected President, how about Secretary of the Treasury?
I will vote for anyone that promises to make Ann Coulter their press secretary :0)
That is toooooo funny! Coulter mocking the Whitehouse press corps would finally bring back some interest in their briefings. Uh Uh yeah!
WOW that is the most wonderful idea I’ve heard in a LONG time!
How weird would it feel to DVR every single presser, but with Coulter there you would totally do that!
Nothing is written! The man glows with energy and good health. Maybe we should all send him several cases of Milk Thistle….Attitude is damn near everything with ca, and Herman is simply the best on that angle!! And not to wish him an early demise, but if he has the jack to oust Obama and does that, it would be a substantial landmark on the road to America’s getting well again, and I would settle for that!! I would also trust Herman Cain to select an extremely worthy VP, and we’d have pulled the country back from the jaws of death……..one step at a time works for me!!!
Response above got away from me before I could add: and then if he were to become POTUS, it would mean that millions of us groundlings would be praying for him on a daily basis (which I’ll get off my butt here and start doing now), and I’d never want to short change his possible outcomes if that were to occur.
The man is nearly perfect for the job. Paired with the right VP he can turn things around. Caine-Ryan could be a winner. Men with good ideas, know-how, and experience in the real world.
Don’t count on winning the black vote with Cain though. He’s to “Uncle Tom” for the masses of gimme-gimme-poor-me.
I meant to write “Cain”. Sorry for the typo.
Why not Cain? Because he’s a TARP cheerleader who was branch chief for the Kansas City Federal Reserve and is for wall street and banks, not the people. He sure speaks well, though, doesn’t he? But we have that now….
“Why not Cain? Because he’s a TARP cheerleader who was branch chief for the Kansas City Federal Reserve and is for wall street and banks, not the people”
While Cain may have supported the idea of TARP, he certainly had nothing to do w/the Federal Reserve when TARP was approved in 2008, having left the K.C. job in 1996. As for the ridiculous comment “is for wall st and banks, not the people”, Cain returned divisions of several large companies to profitability which created jobs for PEOPLE.
Cain didn’t just support tarp, he more or less said that anybody who didn’t was an idiot who should shut up and go away. He was all-in on TARP. And please don’t say he didn’t know what the Fed would do. He spent plenty of time working for the Fed. If anybody should have known better, it should have been Cain.
On to the jobs creation argument. By that standard, Mitt Romney should be the greatest candidate, by a long shot. But Romney and Cain both suffer the same hubris: They think of government like a business. They both think big government can work if you just have the right people in charge (them). Never mind the entire body of work and actual history proving that central planning sucks. They ignore the fact that even if you did get around all of that and had an infallible, incorruptible genius in charge, the next guy would be your average swine of a politician who would squander and / or abuse the system and leave us with a giant pot of power to be fought over for generations (like FDR did, minus the infallible and incorruptible genius part).
So what if Cain will keep the Fed. He will get rid of the IRS.
“Cain….for wall street and banks, not the people”.
“For the people” – like Obama is? The banking and insurance industries contributed more to Obama than McCain during the 2008 election. Goldman-Sachs employees gave 75% of their contributions to Democrats. What do they know that the “people” don’t? When it comes to banks, the Democrats are more capitalistic than the Republicans.
Why Cain? Because if we nominate any of the milquetoast, establishment retreads out there now (Huckaphony, Romneycare, Newt…seriously? Newt?!, Pawlenty, Daniels, etc.) Obama will win and we are over.
It’s time to get deadly serious people. We are one election away from the curtain call of the greatest society man has ever known.
Newt is the only person in American history, who has succeeded in making spending cuts in Washington.
The only one….. How old is America?
I like Newt’s ideas but he is as electable as a trunk full of lead. He should have supported a young capable candidate and aimed to be Secretary of State instead of running for President.
JL, America is 235 years old.
Don’t get me wrong, I like Newt. The guy is brilliant and would most likely make a good POTUS (and we all know that a real newt would be better than Obama). But the man is entirely unelectable. TWO extramarital affairs. I know this is a feature for a Democrat nominee, but it’s a MAJOR bug for a conservative Republican. He’s a big boy, but would never survive the withering MSM attacks. And you know they would wait until AFTER he was nominated to rake him over the coals. That and I can’t get the picture of him sitting on that damn bench with Pelosi and blathering on about global warming something or other. He’s establishment and he’d be toast in the general against the big-eared marxist.
Spending cuts are fantastic and must be the goal, but it’s hard to make spending cuts from the losers bracket.
Not true. War spending notwithstanding (as in, ignoring the fact that military spending was cut dramatically after every war), the Republican Congress and the Harding/Coolidge administration made deep cuts in both taxes and spending.
To me the most important thing is we don’t get a Harvard or Yale man. It’s like electing a foreigner or trained deceiver.
van Jones a product of Yale.
Alan Grayson a product of Harvard
You forgot Harvard’s star: Ted Kaczynski.
I would gladly vote for a Herman Cain, Allen West ticket. Would not bat an eye, flinch, hesitate, …would have not a single reservation.
In fact, it would be the first national election in which I would cancel all my plans to watch live…every single debate minute. Going in, the early chalk for the DUMBEST guy in the Presidential/VP debates…well, there’s a prohibitive favorite…and I would not describe him as “clean and articulate”, but rather, as rumpled and ditzy.
It would put a ten penny nail in the coffin of the “Tea partiers are racists”…I mean, if Condi Rice was brought back as Sec’y of State and Marco Rubio was given a Cabinet post…the leftists would be hard pressed to continue to peddle that lie to anyone with a firing synapse.
However, I happen to like a number of the “young guns” as well. Sharp, bright, a bit wonkish…but…it is the Republican SUBSTANCE against the leftist propaganda machine. Don’t laugh. This is a tough fight…and it isn’t a fair one.
Cantor, Ryan, Christie, Daniels, Thune, Pawlenty, Niki Haley, Bobby Jindal, Kristi Noem, ….there is something building within the Republican ranks that looks and feels like some real, solid, lineup of future stars.
The crooked, lapdog media will do everything they can to squash this. They will CONSTANTLY put the faces they can most easily attack on their screens every night and in their columns every day.
They will promote their “straw” candidates that drive away the independents…and hammer at their traditional “memes” of extremism, racism, homophobia, warmongering, religious zealotry.
I think a Herman Cain/Eric Cantor ticket would scare them to death. Intellectually they would be wildly overmatched. But their “message” would suffer.
For THIS election…I would stay away from the “celebrity politicians”. Bachman, Trump, Palin, Gingrich, Huckabee, Paul.
Herman Cain has all the right stuff. Most importantly…he’s got the ability to go head to head on delivering the Republican “message”. If there is a giant hole in Republican Party…that’s it. They suck at fighting a crooked message and propaganda machine. Herman has experience fighting against an unlevel playing field…and winning. It’s a skill that is mandatory in Republican politics today.
You best be promoting Jaime Herrera Beutler, Quico Canseco, Bill Flores, Brian Sandoval, and naca-looking Susana Martinez to cabinet posts ahead of Marco.
you’re right
this is what has been lacking since reagan
taking the fight to the left on intellectual grounds
i dont care who the messenger is if he/she can clearly and concisely present the message of limited gov’t, free(r) markets, freedom in general etc., and at the same time make mincemeat of the left’s position– something that comes easily to one with confidence and actual belief in the message
Someone should also vet his tenure as National Restaurant Association chair in regards to immigration policies. Positions on that issue were absent on his website as late as March 2011. I have a feeling that may have been a hidden skeleton in the closet of Mike Ditka (former Chgo Bears coach, present owner/operator of several restaurants) had he decided to run for U.S. senate in 2004 against…oh why bring it up now, it just makes me sad and mad.
I admit, I’m not completely sold on Cain. I just don’t think we’ve seen enough of him yet, and yes, there might be a couple of skeletons we haven’t found in the closet yet. But what I have seen, I definitely like.
He has all the private-sector experience that Obama so patently lacks. Granted, so does Trump, but Trump is looking more and more like an egomaniac, and we don’t need anybody who can be described as a “celebrity (noun)” in this election. Celebrity politicians or celebrity businessmen need not apply, not when so much is at stake.
Side note: the way the left focuses on his race definitely shows what’s really on their mind. The man’s named *Cain,* for God’s sake–if they wanted to just hurl insults, there’s plenty to work with right there. But no, they had to go straight for the Uncle Tom, monkey-in-the-window (urgh) BS. They’re projecting so much that you could turn one into a home theatre system.
LOL, the unknown Cain has as much chances to win the White House as the unknown Scott Brown had to win Ted Kennedy’s seat, and has as much chances as Rand Paul had to win the Republican nomination without the Republican establishment’s endorsement.
His chances would be even lower if TOTUS were allowed in the talking point debates.
I don’t like Cain, but that’s still an awesome point.
Not to mention Bubba in 1992…
sure. we are going to see a ground swell of republicans voters supporting legalization of heroin. it’s time has come.
Legal or not, the current occupant in the White House has admitted to having used illegal drugs.
I would like to remind you that the Clinton political machine, as is
the Obama/Chicago machine, ABSOLUTELY at the whim of the SOROS machine.
Nothing else matters on the left.
I like Herman Cain. The more I see him the more I like him.
He had the funniest line of the republican debate last week, words to the effect…
“I’m criticized for not having held elective office. Well, have a look at all the folks in elective office in Washington DC. How’s that working for you ?!
Everybody cracked up. Cain seems to have a great sense of humor, speaks straightforwardly and clearly, also qualities that set him apart from the career politician.
From the comments it still looks like race is a big part of choosing Cain…but I keep thinking colin powell, another GOP dream candidate.
The nominee must NOT be from DC, never again. I will not vote for the lesser-of-2-evils again. Cain is not my preferance, and I will reluctantly vote for him if the GOP nominee. I would preferr Col West after Gov palin.
I daresay that a black man, courageously standing publicly for American free enterprise and individual meritocracy, is even scarier to the left than a rising Mama Grizzly.
Another man that fits your description is the head of the black chamber of commerce,
Harry Alford
We can juxtapose Mr. Alford to that “other” black chamber of commerce, the one supported by Barack Obama, whose top official Brandon Trainer…
Has just jumped bail
O.K., how about Herman Cain for Pres and victor Davis Hanson for VP? That would really tie the Donks’ knickers in a tight knot!!!
Oh give me a break… this guy is the Alan Keyes/Mike Gravel of this year’s cycle. Entertaining enough to catch peoples’ eyes, but not a serious candidate with any chance at all of winning. If you really think he has a shot of winning either the nomination, much less the general, you’re in la la land.
Asked what he would do on Afghanistan as President, his only answer was that he would “consult with a team of experts.”
No thanks.
Don’t you know the first thing a successful business leader does? Delegate to expert subordinates and let them succeed. Explain why that wouldn’t work for POTUS?
Abraham Lincoln was perhaps the greatest President the United States has ever had. Yet imagine if Lincoln, on a question of war, stated that he “would have to consult with a team of specialists.” If the United States during its greatest crises were led by men such as Herman Cain, it would not exist by now. A NATION is not a business (even though so many politicians and pundits nowadays treat America as though it were), and a good businessman does not a good statesman make. Consulting with expert advisers has its place, but the President needs to have a broad understanding the major problems of his time. Cain has had 10 years to ponder the issues involved in the war in Afghanistan, and more broadly in the defense of America and the West against the global jihad. He was too busy making money instead–which is perfectly ok. But he has no business running for the position of leader of the free world.
Stan, you must be one of those squishy independents someone mentioned, and I dare say you are wrong. Yes, it would be preferable if Cain had been a governor for example. I was born and reared in Switzerland where we don’t have career politicians, and where people serve in government that have been farmers, business types, scientists and more. Statesman ship is a fuzzy term anyway, there are very few in the world that truly deserve to be called statesman. I am sure Clinton thought of himself as such, how wrong he was. Many a dictator believes himself to be a statesman and what is worse is that the people in those countries also believe it.
Me, a squishy independent? Way off-base. Nothing could be further from my intentions than advocating limiting one’s consideration to “career politicians”. To say that a good businessman would not NECESSARILY make a good President certainly does not mean that a good businessman CANNOT be a good President. But a candidate with a business background ought to understand the difference, and success in business should not be the defining theme of a campaign. For me, Herman Cain’s ignorance and smug incuriosity about the pressing issues of the day, as revealed by his non-stance on Afghanistan, take him out of the running.
George W. Bush’s policy reversals during his second term undermined the achievements, and added to the errors, of his first term. We do NOT need another President who is a creature of his advisers, over which the voters have no control. I can’t bring myself to trust the judgement of a candidate who has no ideas of his own.
I agree with you that he needs a more decisive, definitive answer on that singular topic. In general he does need to give more definition upon his views toward foreign policy. The campaign is still young.
Still, I think it is somewhat refreshing in this one context that Herman Cain doesn’t pretend to know everything about everything…unlike certain obvious opponents.
I think his what-you-see-is-what-you-get approach will win over many otherwise unaffiliated voters. It will be a sort of love it or hate it quality of his that I doubt he will lose — I hope he does not because it’s part of his refreshing quality that makes him stand out from the average “politician”.
I am in full support of Cain because we need to stop looking to the same old retreads to get us out of this mess. I am tired of career politicians that have done nothing else for 30 years telling us how to run our lives and businesses. We need to restore the idea of serving in Coingress is a something you do for a short period of time and then return back to the real world. Cain has been sucessful on his business endeavors and what you see is apparently what you get. I hope there are no ugly skeletons in his closet because I would love to se him take his run to at least the VP slot if not all the way to President. I am not sure if he can make a big enough splash with the squishy middle independents to win the general election, but I sure would like to see him have that shot.
No, to Repub retreads: Romney (Romneycare), Huckabee (loves Moochelle’s Big Gov. Let’s Move Program), Newty (recreate the picture of Newt on the couch with Miss Nancy). No to Ron Paul (correct on financial system; but has other nutty ideas) or Gary Johnson (also some nutty ideas–didn’t come over well in the debate). No to Mitch Daniels who shot himself in the foot over social issues. As Jim DeMint said, the social issues drive the spending and really can’t be separated. TPAW also flited with global warming (not critical thinking).
Yes to Palin, Bachmann, Cain, maybe Santorum. Remember, whoever is the nominee, that person will NOT BE PERFECT. All will have something that the Marxist Media Megaphone will disparage. We need someone who can articulate a conservative message, believe it, and able to corral the congress and push reforms through.
Of all the candidates, only Palin has a history of reforms. Which, I suspect, is why she gets disparaged by Karl Rove and other Repubs. Both Palin and Cain or charismatic in their own right. Bachmann holds her own with the Marxist Media types and Santorum held his own in the 1st debate.
This column is a pleasure to read and for this reader very informative and a service.
I have to admit that I had heard a number of good things about Herman Cain, mostly from various blogs where the comments were more in passing than informative. The commentary from the Lame-Stream media is in many ways almost identical to the early vitriol heaped on Sarah Palin from the day that McCain made her a national public figure. Given Mr Cain’s race and his open challenge to Obama and the Left (see note below)he can expect an escalation of hatred and open threats like nothing we have seen to date. Sarah Palin was just a warm up.
This “distillation” of who and what is Herman Cain done by a neighbor (not one that required Mr Cain to build a fence to defend his privacy) wets my appetite for more. The idea of watching this gentleman going mano-a-mano with the White House man-child is beyond intriguing and would be a money maker as an event.
Note: I think given the recent events involving certain national unions and various Democrats and Democrat support organizations, some politicians, and most definitely the media, it is time to drop the euphemistic “Left” and call it what it is, “Communists” and “Communism”. What we are seeing is the open, and in your face rise of Marxism as advocated by one Saul Alinsky, and underwritten by this administration.
Kyle-Anne has a number of insightful and incisive articles regarding Alinsky, Black Liberation Theology and other topics that I are good reading and bring a lot of coverage and explanation to the game. Check her web site archives at
http://www.kyleanneshiver.com.
First time I heard of Herman Cain, we were driving thru Atlanta on our way to visit relatives for Christmas last year and turned on some talk radio to pass the time. I misheard his name and thought it was R.S. McCain, the columnist. “He has a radio show?” I thought. I stopped to listen.
After about five minutes, I figured out it wasn’t McCain – I stayed with the show. Cain was brilliant. I fought to keep the station tuned well enough to catch his name – and finally did. The husband wrote it down for me (I was driving) and when we got home two weeks later, I looked him up, then signed up for his newsletter.
I had no idea til I visited his website he was black. I didn’t care, either. His ideas are spot-on, and his background is exactly what we need today. I am thrilled to death he’s running for president, and he very likely has my vote.
Jamie: Please don’t be afraid to sign up and help Herman Cain, in any way you can!
http://draftcain.org/default.aspx
Reagan once said that he couldn’t see how a President today could be successful without some training in the theater arts. It is about being articulate and being able to reach people emotionally.
Huckabee’s strength is his skill as a preacher. He would not have done so well without it. Say what you want about him, he is very articulate and relate-able.
Cain’s strength is similar. After being a radio guy for so long, he has learned how to reach people. One needs to understand the issues, but one MUST be able to argue articulately the underlying premises, also.
This is a time when we need someone who can get past the web of lies, expose the truth. The problem with the professional pols is that they are part of the problem. They have bought into the system. They are vested in it. They cannot challenge the fundamental lies. (This is Huckabee’s problem especially. He makes good arguments on issues, but embraces the underlying problem, government.) I think Cain may be the guy who can do this.
It will not be enough to win the office and fight for certain issues and approaches. Our guy will have to provide a sea-change to the culture, the way of thinking about politics. You have to get through to the people, get them to turn away from government solutions and dependence, else there will be no fix.
“This government was designed for a moral people. It is wholly unsuited to any other.”
We need better people to get better government. To get better people, we need better, and very articulate, leaders… leaders with a strong moral compass. Someone like Romney does not fit that bill. He is called flip-flop Mitt for a reason. His campaign chief just quit because of that very “quality” about him. A man with a strong moral compass is not a flip-flopper. An obscenely ambitious politician is.
When we decide to become better people ourselves, we will elect better people.
Nothing like those timeless truths to resonate within the soul……
I like HC. we need to get away from lock step repubs like newt and away from people like palin, trump and paul. and I like thoes 3. just not for pres. I like trump for his candor, but his running would cause too many probs. Palin i like as a speaker. but she is too devisive and the fact she never finished her term as gov is bad. I know she left for her state. but the fact is she let the libs bully her out. paul. I like but his running would be a joke. and would never get any air time cept for derision. Plus he would be seen as the ‘old white candidate. so “racism” would be used at every turn. Herman is black…no racism. he is conservative, he is not well known. he is forceful, but not a blowhard mugging for the cameras like trump. there are other things too. Look before the nastgrams start comming in think. we need to WIN. we need to think tactically. the dems are doing that 24x7x365. look at obamas campaign it was damn near PERFECT. the right words, the right symbolism, the right everything. (cept the right person )But we need to run ther campaign like that. we need people fainting in the isles. we have the truly right message, and the truth as well. but that wont matter if we get overshadowed by obama and his tactics. and if we keep focusing on bullshit like birth certificates, and grades instead of obamas police which we have him NAILED dead to rights. we are gonna get marginalized and we are gonna loose. why cause flash and awe will always win over facts and figures.aka a hot dumb chick is always more preferable to a fugly smart one. sorry its human nature
After watching excerpts of the debate Herman Cain impressed me and he is probably our best hope to LEAD us out of the entitlement mentality. I watched more of what he had to say on eyeblast.tv and youtube. The tax system we have protects the wealthy. Just walk the marinas and check the registry on the largest yachts. Or wander the ramps of the FBO’s and investigate the tail numbers of business jets. The rich have their paper corporations to protect their toys. Make all of it taxable and it will be more taxes then they have ever paid. Why do you think they are willing to spend billions in PAC money to keep the political hacks that we have today?
Oh heck yes please. To be a Black Conservative in this country today requires Testicular Fortitude. Let’s be honest – such a man or woman faces unreasoned hatred from many sides. To stand up to that and be of Principled Conservative Character takes a steel backbone.
If the Republican party determines that a man like Herman Cain isn’t “electable”, the GOP is over.
I agree with you. I also forgot something in my earlier post: Cain/Paul would work for me too. The most important thing to keep in mind is that the democrats bring to the fight, knives, sticks, stones, guns and anything else that can cause severe injuries. It is time that the repubs learn to fight the same way, give back so to speak, and I have the impression that Cain might just be able to do that and without lies, smears, innuendos etc. He seems to have a strong spine and is fearless.
As an independent, I could vote for this guy barring an unlikely Paul nomination. Otherwise, Obama gets it by default. By electing a truly oppositional candidate, maybe the GOP would garner some credibility, and be considered more than the diet version of Democrats.
It IS morning in America! Happy Friday the 13th:) Lucky article on a lucky day in this Mary’s month of May! May Mary Immaculate ~Patroness of United States~ pray for us! Thank you Kyle-Anne for bringing Herman Cain to our attention:) God bless you and America!
For the first time in my life, I’m going to give money to a candidate: Herman Cain.
I wish the RNC would get behind him; I wish all the other wanna-bes (Romney, Daniels, Newt, etc.) would back out and announce that Herman Cain is the Republican Party’s choice.
How wonderful would it be to watch Herman Cain debate Obungle, mano-mano? Oooh, I just got a tingle in my leg that Chris Matthews never felt!
There is no need to give Obama and the so-called news media 17 months to trash our candidate. Let Obama continue to set up straw men to trash, until he looks ridiculously weak for going into campaign mode a year before he should have. I hope we don’t know who our guy is until the Republican convention. These other candidates will make great fodder for now. For now, I want the debt ceiling fixed where it is and lets watch these Marxists of the professional left discover that they have no more big government power to control the means of production in our country. Then we can see about the elections.
I understand your impatience but if Cain is all I hope he is. He can handle the fight for the Republican nomination. And I feel he will come out stronger for it.
I am amazed by the comments on this thread! People are looking for a strong leader, but should be looking for strong leader who will do “nothing.” The essence of being conservative is to realized that there are consequences for action and unintended consequences for action. We need leaders who will take small tentative steps, await results, and then move ahead or backwards without regret. Socialists with fairies dancing in their heads about “fairness” charge ahead over the bodies of those who oppose them. We need a true conservative leader who understands that results of policies are too complicated to intuit.
Understanding that systems are complicated explains why Conservatives favor a strong defense policy. When “change” is externally imposed on America, conservatives wish to exclude it until such changes have proved benign. No sane person invites disease into their bodies to see whether the body is strong enough to defeat the invader.
Those liberals who argue that change is necessary so that our society does not constantly support the equivalent of “colored” or “white” bathrooms or misogyny should take note that things change toward “fairness” whatever anybody does. It was the Democratic solid South that kept “blacks in their place for decades. And it was hard working men who supported their families that kept their women at home taking care of the kids. Who takes care of the kids now? No one too much!
Politics we must never forget revolves about the use of power. Soros will buy the next election through control of the press. He has “changed” the definition of ‘journalist’ to advocate. What we need is a counterpoint to Soros’ purchase-plan of an entire profession. Money talks, along with influence and sex. Under these circumstances finding someone who is truly conservative is difficult. What we want to do is somewhat anomalous! We want to elect someone who is powerful, but restrained in using that power because he knows that power corrupts. For me so far that means voting for anyone who has the guts to oppose Obama. Fact is that I would vote for Donald Duck if he ran against Obama. But Cain, Palin, Bachmann, Gingrich, would do just fine in spite of their obvious policy differences.
Bill Johnson said:
“…but Herman isn’t afraid to appear in public or on camera in a sport /polo shirt. And give the impression of being truly relaxed and comfortable with himself no matter the surroundings. Both of these ‘Little Things’ speak volumes to me about the ‘MAN’ Herman Cain is. And makes the comparisons to all of the others, from BOTH parties look like cardboard-media-ads.”
I don’t know enough about Cain’s policy ideas yet to have an opinion of him, but I do know that the American people like that “relxed and comfortable with himself” quality. It’s what got JFK elected. It’s the quality that propelled Sarah Palin into instant popularity.
He is one of my top four or five.
http://bit.ly/itzHog
It’s simple to answer. Herman Cain is not a Marxist(Anti-Christ by definition)!
What I find amazing is that women are primarily dominant in verbal skills and men primarily are dominant in motor skills! “Verbal” people “intellectualize” and motor people “motorize!” Lucifer appeals to intellectualizing, which is verbal skills based and was, in fact, the first sin! Obama is academia and intellectualizes, which women just love!
Let us not forget that Ronald Reagan was “Un-electable” and McCain was “the media darling”.
The Washington establishment will try to close ranks and defeat Cain.
Also do not forget that the media tried to portray Obama as a Conservative. Then he let slip the “spread the wealth around” comment to Joe the plumber, and he still got elected. He then treated that statement like a mandate. After all it was out there for all to hear(though most weren’t listening. Conservatives knew exactly who he was and what that statement meant. Now the “moderate” “middle” know what he meant.
Barack Obama gave us the TEA party movement. The left has awoken a sleeping giant (the average American) and we have no intention of going back to sleep.
Herman Cain speaks directly to the TEA party movement. People who want to get back to limited government to include “citizen” lawmakers who aren’t looking at the government as a career choice, but as a responsibility.
May God bless America; and may American once again stand for Truth.
I watched the Fox debate. Beyond a doubt, Herman Cain came across as the type of mature, reasonable, stable, moral adult we need. Given politics as usual, I’m afraid the political inexperience will scare people. This would be a shame as he’s the only one I see right now as a true leader. He has to figure a way to make people understand that this is an asset rather than a detriment. I believe his business experience would have to take center stage.
2013 looks like a very promising year!
Yes! Thanks, Kyle-Anne. The more I learn about Cain, the better, quicker and tougher he seems.
I just hope we have an election to elect Herman Cain next year.
Here’s why no Herman Cain: 1, Women control the voting block! 2. Women are verbal and men are motor-skills dominant! 3. Verbal domination leads to “intellectualizing”(Ask Eve). 4. I even think that Karl Marx was thinking about “Eve” and “Lucifer” when he made his Marxist(Anti-Christ, as Islam) Manifesto! 5. There also is the Bibical first-born blood covenant made between Eve, Cain, and Lucifer! Yes, Eve started man’s age 6,000 years ago and now she is ending it! No? Tell me next November, 2012 when the final 3 1/2 years of man’s age begins under the endtime “Anti-Christ!” Watch! Let’s see, now we America, Israel by the seed of Joseph(Gen. 48:16), have placed a self-reported Black Marxist(Anti-Christ) over it u.s. as President! A man(“Dreams of My Father), who hates anglo-saxon men almost as much as anglo-saxon women! No? Watch! I’m sure that you verbal-dominant ladies know that obama’s father overthrew the only other Republic in the world, which was Kenya, right? I’m sure that you also know that Marxist takeovers require holocausts, right? But then, it wil be u.s. men and not you, right? I wonder if the two-witnesses in Revelation, Chapter 11 will be thinking that way? No! I do not think so! Watch!
Sheesh! I hope I don’t catch that.
I just like the valuable info you provide in your articles. I will bookmark your blog and check again here regularly. I am relatively sure I?ll learn a lot of new stuff proper here! Good luck for the next!
Hi, Neat post. There’s an issue together with your site in web explorer, might test this? IE nonetheless is the marketplace leader and a good component of folks will miss your excellent writing because of this problem.
Nice blog right here! Also your website loads up fast! What host are you using? Can I get your associate link on your host? I want my site loaded up as quickly as yours lol