<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Do Women Love Mad Men?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/why-do-women-love-mad-men/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/why-do-women-love-mad-men/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:37:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lily</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/why-do-women-love-mad-men/#comment-936643</link>
		<dc:creator>Lily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 22:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64230#comment-936643</guid>
		<description>How interesting! It&#039;s great to hear that the show is actually accurate from a lady who lived through the era!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How interesting! It&#8217;s great to hear that the show is actually accurate from a lady who lived through the era!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/why-do-women-love-mad-men/#comment-703622</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64230#comment-703622</guid>
		<description>Women love pretty dresses :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Women love pretty dresses <img src='http://pjmedia.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/why-do-women-love-mad-men/#comment-693883</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 00:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64230#comment-693883</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve watched the first three seasons. While I do believe there were some entertaining moments, I just don&#039;t think it warrants all of the praise and awards it&#039;s been given. I&#039;d rather watch Friday Night Lights. FNL has characters I can relate to. None of the Mad Men characters are likable, except maybe Peggy, but she&#039;s only tolerable sometimes. Pete&#039;s a weasel, John is a pervert, and Don is full of himself. If it weren&#039;t for the affairs and sex, the show would actually be quite boring &#039;cause I don&#039;t give a damn about their lame ads or how they come up with their copy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve watched the first three seasons. While I do believe there were some entertaining moments, I just don&#8217;t think it warrants all of the praise and awards it&#8217;s been given. I&#8217;d rather watch Friday Night Lights. FNL has characters I can relate to. None of the Mad Men characters are likable, except maybe Peggy, but she&#8217;s only tolerable sometimes. Pete&#8217;s a weasel, John is a pervert, and Don is full of himself. If it weren&#8217;t for the affairs and sex, the show would actually be quite boring &#8217;cause I don&#8217;t give a damn about their lame ads or how they come up with their copy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/why-do-women-love-mad-men/#comment-676774</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 22:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64230#comment-676774</guid>
		<description>Women love the pretty dresses... duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Women love the pretty dresses&#8230; duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/why-do-women-love-mad-men/#comment-636770</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 03:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64230#comment-636770</guid>
		<description>are you serious with this article? Uh, maybe women like the show because its smart and portrays women in a complex, respectful and feminist light...which is the complete opposite of your sexist, stereotpyical article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are you serious with this article? Uh, maybe women like the show because its smart and portrays women in a complex, respectful and feminist light&#8230;which is the complete opposite of your sexist, stereotpyical article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baseball fan</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/why-do-women-love-mad-men/#comment-620585</link>
		<dc:creator>Baseball fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 05:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64230#comment-620585</guid>
		<description>Anyone who thinks &quot;Mad Men&quot; should aim to accurately depict life in the early 1960s suffers from a fundamental misunderstanding of what television/Hollywood does.

Certainly, some aspects of that era are accurately portrayed, and in stunning fashion. But when it comes to presenting a worldview, TV shows and movies are not supposed to be accurate. They&#039;re not supposed to show you the whole picture. It&#039;s all pretty much propaganda, which means some things are going to be omitted, while other things will be highlighted, depending on the agenda.

The much-maligned &quot;Leave it to Beaver&quot; does give us a good insight into how life was during the early &#039;60s; &quot;Mad Men&quot; gives another. Neither, however, gives the entire picture.

In postwar America, many families did spend more time together like the Cleavers; Dad was a stable force who provided for his family, while Mom enjoyed staying home taking care of home and hearth.

Then again, the immorality and debauchary depicted in &quot;Mad Men&quot; also existed. Some dads molested their children and beat their wives. Some women cheated on their hard-working, faithful husbands and abused their chidren. 

We&#039;re not shown the seedier side of life in &quot;Leave it to Beaver,&quot; and we&#039;re not shown the good side of human nature in &quot;Mad Men.&quot; And that&#039;s because they&#039;re pieces of propaganda which have different goals.

But propaganda can be entertaining; in fact, it&#039;s crucial to the process -- if it weren&#039;t entertaining it wouldn&#039;t draw us in. &quot;All in the Family&quot; was pure propaganda, and I loved it. How many housewives do you know who literally ran to fetch their husbands&#039; beers like Edith did?

Like &quot;All in the Family,&quot; &quot;Mad Men&quot; is a great TV show. You just have to realize going in that it&#039;s going to present a certain worldview. As long as you bear that in mind, you can enjoy it for the entertainment aspect of it.


As to the central question of why women like the show, it&#039;s simple: Bad boy syndrome. Many women find bad boys sexy, but their sensibilities can&#039;t tolerate the very reasons for the badness. So they convince themselves they can change their bad boys, at least until they finally realize he won&#039;t change.

Women watch the show hoping some woman will come along to change Don Draper. After all, while he&#039;s certainly a lout, it&#039;s also been made clear that he isn&#039;t all bad. And he was abused as a kid -- perfect reasons for a starry-eyed bad boy groupie to hang her hat on when deciding whether to continue putting up with her boy&#039;s badness.

&quot;It&#039;s not his fault; his dad beat him. And he has a chivalrous side, too. He&#039;s only bad because he&#039;s trying to cover up his fears and insecurities from having been abused. If I can help him get over those fears, he&#039;ll stop being bad.&quot;

Textbook stuff. Will some woman come along to save Don Draper from his demons? Stay tuned...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who thinks &#8220;Mad Men&#8221; should aim to accurately depict life in the early 1960s suffers from a fundamental misunderstanding of what television/Hollywood does.</p>
<p>Certainly, some aspects of that era are accurately portrayed, and in stunning fashion. But when it comes to presenting a worldview, TV shows and movies are not supposed to be accurate. They&#8217;re not supposed to show you the whole picture. It&#8217;s all pretty much propaganda, which means some things are going to be omitted, while other things will be highlighted, depending on the agenda.</p>
<p>The much-maligned &#8220;Leave it to Beaver&#8221; does give us a good insight into how life was during the early &#8217;60s; &#8220;Mad Men&#8221; gives another. Neither, however, gives the entire picture.</p>
<p>In postwar America, many families did spend more time together like the Cleavers; Dad was a stable force who provided for his family, while Mom enjoyed staying home taking care of home and hearth.</p>
<p>Then again, the immorality and debauchary depicted in &#8220;Mad Men&#8221; also existed. Some dads molested their children and beat their wives. Some women cheated on their hard-working, faithful husbands and abused their chidren. </p>
<p>We&#8217;re not shown the seedier side of life in &#8220;Leave it to Beaver,&#8221; and we&#8217;re not shown the good side of human nature in &#8220;Mad Men.&#8221; And that&#8217;s because they&#8217;re pieces of propaganda which have different goals.</p>
<p>But propaganda can be entertaining; in fact, it&#8217;s crucial to the process &#8212; if it weren&#8217;t entertaining it wouldn&#8217;t draw us in. &#8220;All in the Family&#8221; was pure propaganda, and I loved it. How many housewives do you know who literally ran to fetch their husbands&#8217; beers like Edith did?</p>
<p>Like &#8220;All in the Family,&#8221; &#8220;Mad Men&#8221; is a great TV show. You just have to realize going in that it&#8217;s going to present a certain worldview. As long as you bear that in mind, you can enjoy it for the entertainment aspect of it.</p>
<p>As to the central question of why women like the show, it&#8217;s simple: Bad boy syndrome. Many women find bad boys sexy, but their sensibilities can&#8217;t tolerate the very reasons for the badness. So they convince themselves they can change their bad boys, at least until they finally realize he won&#8217;t change.</p>
<p>Women watch the show hoping some woman will come along to change Don Draper. After all, while he&#8217;s certainly a lout, it&#8217;s also been made clear that he isn&#8217;t all bad. And he was abused as a kid &#8212; perfect reasons for a starry-eyed bad boy groupie to hang her hat on when deciding whether to continue putting up with her boy&#8217;s badness.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s not his fault; his dad beat him. And he has a chivalrous side, too. He&#8217;s only bad because he&#8217;s trying to cover up his fears and insecurities from having been abused. If I can help him get over those fears, he&#8217;ll stop being bad.&#8221;</p>
<p>Textbook stuff. Will some woman come along to save Don Draper from his demons? Stay tuned&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/why-do-women-love-mad-men/#comment-608709</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 22:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64230#comment-608709</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t watch it, but I believe from comments I have read it gives the liberal white man haters an excuse to continue their reverse discrimination with a warped clear conscience.
PS I have a Hispanic surname, support border security, oppose amnesty, was 100% feminist supportive until I finally realized it is a &quot;really screw the man anyway we can fairness has no place here&quot; movement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t watch it, but I believe from comments I have read it gives the liberal white man haters an excuse to continue their reverse discrimination with a warped clear conscience.<br />
PS I have a Hispanic surname, support border security, oppose amnesty, was 100% feminist supportive until I finally realized it is a &#8220;really screw the man anyway we can fairness has no place here&#8221; movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/why-do-women-love-mad-men/#comment-502654</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64230#comment-502654</guid>
		<description>Wow, this review is hilarious! Good job at completely failing to understand women. I&#039;ve met many women who love this show, but not a single one who would &quot;sigh with relief in contemplation&quot; of the Mad Men world, nor a single one who would want to be married to Don. 

But of course there will be out of touch men who interpret peoples&#039; respect for a brilliantly NIHILISTIC drama as genuine approval of the time period. We like it because of how utterly brutal, chaotic, and heartwrenching it is, not because we want to live in their world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this review is hilarious! Good job at completely failing to understand women. I&#8217;ve met many women who love this show, but not a single one who would &#8220;sigh with relief in contemplation&#8221; of the Mad Men world, nor a single one who would want to be married to Don. </p>
<p>But of course there will be out of touch men who interpret peoples&#8217; respect for a brilliantly NIHILISTIC drama as genuine approval of the time period. We like it because of how utterly brutal, chaotic, and heartwrenching it is, not because we want to live in their world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/why-do-women-love-mad-men/#comment-381213</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64230#comment-381213</guid>
		<description>MM lost me with Betty&#039;s affair.  She was the one character who seemed to stick to her principles, however flawed.  Now, the sole purpose of the show appears to be liberal loathing of American society  -- capitalism is bad, family is pointless, everyone is a hypocrite so anything you do is OK.  How boring and disappointing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MM lost me with Betty&#8217;s affair.  She was the one character who seemed to stick to her principles, however flawed.  Now, the sole purpose of the show appears to be liberal loathing of American society  &#8212; capitalism is bad, family is pointless, everyone is a hypocrite so anything you do is OK.  How boring and disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demosophist</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/why-do-women-love-mad-men/#comment-380353</link>
		<dc:creator>Demosophist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64230#comment-380353</guid>
		<description>An article about the show is sure generating a lot of comments for a TV drama that few watch.  I watched an episode just to see what all the fuss was about, and found it sort of boring.  I think the thesis of the show is anti-family and anti-society, which is viewed as trendy and hip, so it legitimates a kind of pile-on fantasy mongering.  What&#039;s significant is that it was the Mick Jagger or Elvis sort of bad boy that used to appeal to women, and now it&#039;s this guy in a well tailored suit.  It&#039;s all about status, or rather status combined with sex appeal that has been legitimated (so one needn&#039;t be ashamed).  During the &#039;60s the lie told to women was more subtle: that they were joining a &quot;movement,&quot; with a hierarchy that had been legitimated by &quot;the struggle.&quot;  What we have now is a more &quot;mature&quot; hedonism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An article about the show is sure generating a lot of comments for a TV drama that few watch.  I watched an episode just to see what all the fuss was about, and found it sort of boring.  I think the thesis of the show is anti-family and anti-society, which is viewed as trendy and hip, so it legitimates a kind of pile-on fantasy mongering.  What&#8217;s significant is that it was the Mick Jagger or Elvis sort of bad boy that used to appeal to women, and now it&#8217;s this guy in a well tailored suit.  It&#8217;s all about status, or rather status combined with sex appeal that has been legitimated (so one needn&#8217;t be ashamed).  During the &#8217;60s the lie told to women was more subtle: that they were joining a &#8220;movement,&#8221; with a hierarchy that had been legitimated by &#8220;the struggle.&#8221;  What we have now is a more &#8220;mature&#8221; hedonism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

