<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whose Sovereignty Is Obama Respecting?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/whose-sovereignty-is-obama-respecting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/whose-sovereignty-is-obama-respecting/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 06:11:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robohobo</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/whose-sovereignty-is-obama-respecting/#comment-381190</link>
		<dc:creator>Robohobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64494#comment-381190</guid>
		<description>Moho @ 24:

&lt;blockquote&gt;You idiots put us trillions into debt to turn Iraq into an inferno and we have nothing to show for it. Nice work.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

But, but, but, what about that stealing of the oil? You mean to say that didn&#039;t occur? Wha? Wait!

Moho, the whole war effort was less than 1 trillion. Make sure you get your facts right. OTOH, The 0bamanation is going to run a deficit of 9 trillion dollars in the next 10 years. But we know that facts don&#039;t matter to you do they?

Okay, okay, I&#039;ll stop baiting the poor darlings, Sherab.

Here you go folks, part of what Oleg is talking about:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.financialsense.com/stormwatch/geo/pastanalysis/2009/0814.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Secret Takeovers&lt;/a&gt;

Money quote:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;...quoting from a high-level Soviet Bloc defector named Jan Sejna, who explained: “Soviet ambitions towards the United States were aimed at the extinction of Capitalism and the ‘socialization’ of America…. The main strategic goals on the road to their fulfillment were: the withdrawal of the U.S.A. from Europe and Asia; the removal of Latin America from the United States’ sphere of influence and its incorporation into the Socialist bloc; the destruction of the United States influence in the developing world; the reduction of American military power to a state of strategic inferiority; the advent to power in Washington of a transitional and progressive government; and the collapse of the American economy.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yikes! Devolved into moho and ms. whata&#039;tude show in 56 comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moho @ 24:</p>
<blockquote><p>You idiots put us trillions into debt to turn Iraq into an inferno and we have nothing to show for it. Nice work.</p></blockquote>
<p>But, but, but, what about that stealing of the oil? You mean to say that didn&#8217;t occur? Wha? Wait!</p>
<p>Moho, the whole war effort was less than 1 trillion. Make sure you get your facts right. OTOH, The 0bamanation is going to run a deficit of 9 trillion dollars in the next 10 years. But we know that facts don&#8217;t matter to you do they?</p>
<p>Okay, okay, I&#8217;ll stop baiting the poor darlings, Sherab.</p>
<p>Here you go folks, part of what Oleg is talking about:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.financialsense.com/stormwatch/geo/pastanalysis/2009/0814.html" rel="nofollow">Secret Takeovers</a></p>
<p>Money quote:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;&#8230;quoting from a high-level Soviet Bloc defector named Jan Sejna, who explained: “Soviet ambitions towards the United States were aimed at the extinction of Capitalism and the ‘socialization’ of America…. The main strategic goals on the road to their fulfillment were: the withdrawal of the U.S.A. from Europe and Asia; the removal of Latin America from the United States’ sphere of influence and its incorporation into the Socialist bloc; the destruction of the United States influence in the developing world; the reduction of American military power to a state of strategic inferiority; the advent to power in Washington of a transitional and progressive government; and the collapse of the American economy.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Yikes! Devolved into moho and ms. whata&#8217;tude show in 56 comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Attitude</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/whose-sovereignty-is-obama-respecting/#comment-378368</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Attitude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64494#comment-378368</guid>
		<description>Moho, loosing credibility with you is like loosing it to a stick.  A simple search on Youtube and other video sources will show you many attrocities of the SEIU.  There are others but not everyone is filming!  The Democrats are paying people $15 an hour to show up at the townhall meetings to raise cain...look it up, I know you&#039;ll find it.  Obama is failing and he&#039;s pulling out all of the stops, he wants to turn the races on each other so his failures aren&#039;t so glaring in our faces.  Wake up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moho, loosing credibility with you is like loosing it to a stick.  A simple search on Youtube and other video sources will show you many attrocities of the SEIU.  There are others but not everyone is filming!  The Democrats are paying people $15 an hour to show up at the townhall meetings to raise cain&#8230;look it up, I know you&#8217;ll find it.  Obama is failing and he&#8217;s pulling out all of the stops, he wants to turn the races on each other so his failures aren&#8217;t so glaring in our faces.  Wake up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moho</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/whose-sovereignty-is-obama-respecting/#comment-378094</link>
		<dc:creator>Moho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 01:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64494#comment-378094</guid>
		<description>There are no such videos. There is a video in which two people are on the ground. I know that one of those men is a minister, a supposed &quot;SEIU&quot; thug. I don&#039;t know anything about the other one except that his showing up in a wheelchair but no visible wounds of any kind on any part of his body, and with a lawyer in tow, certainly didn&#039;t do anything for his credibility. In any case, hanging the charge based on one incident in which culpability--if there is any--hasn&#039;t been assigned is lame at best, and disinformatory at worst. And I do think it is the worst going on here. You want to hang a Jimmy Hoffa-esque banner across the SEIU hoping that people will attach the mafia knee-breaking trope to them. But the majority of SEIU workers are female, and they are in the service industry. Most of them are janitors and low-paid home care attendants and hospital workers. This is just bs, and frankly, you lost all credibility when you brought it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are no such videos. There is a video in which two people are on the ground. I know that one of those men is a minister, a supposed &#8220;SEIU&#8221; thug. I don&#8217;t know anything about the other one except that his showing up in a wheelchair but no visible wounds of any kind on any part of his body, and with a lawyer in tow, certainly didn&#8217;t do anything for his credibility. In any case, hanging the charge based on one incident in which culpability&#8211;if there is any&#8211;hasn&#8217;t been assigned is lame at best, and disinformatory at worst. And I do think it is the worst going on here. You want to hang a Jimmy Hoffa-esque banner across the SEIU hoping that people will attach the mafia knee-breaking trope to them. But the majority of SEIU workers are female, and they are in the service industry. Most of them are janitors and low-paid home care attendants and hospital workers. This is just bs, and frankly, you lost all credibility when you brought it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Attitude</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/whose-sovereignty-is-obama-respecting/#comment-378069</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Attitude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64494#comment-378069</guid>
		<description>Obama told Diane Sawyer in June that government should “study and figure out what works and what doesn’t. And let’s encourage doctors and patients to get what works. Let’s discourage what doesn’t.”

Sawyer then asked him: “Will it just be encouragement? Or will there be a board making Solomonic decisions?”

Obama replied, “What I’ve suggested is—is that we have a—a commission that helps—made up of doctors, made up of experts, that helps set best—best practices.”

When Sawyer pressed him to say whether those practices would be enforced by law, he evaded the question.


Moho, what was he talking about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama told Diane Sawyer in June that government should “study and figure out what works and what doesn’t. And let’s encourage doctors and patients to get what works. Let’s discourage what doesn’t.”</p>
<p>Sawyer then asked him: “Will it just be encouragement? Or will there be a board making Solomonic decisions?”</p>
<p>Obama replied, “What I’ve suggested is—is that we have a—a commission that helps—made up of doctors, made up of experts, that helps set best—best practices.”</p>
<p>When Sawyer pressed him to say whether those practices would be enforced by law, he evaded the question.</p>
<p>Moho, what was he talking about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Attitude</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/whose-sovereignty-is-obama-respecting/#comment-378068</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Attitude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64494#comment-378068</guid>
		<description>Moho, you are reading too much into things.  It seems you are looking for a fight.  As for my view of history, I majored in history and am a big history buff.  We don&#039;t want the US to be the way it was at the founding, we want the principles.  

As for the death panels and the SEIU thugs, if you read quotes from Obama and those he surounds himself with you&#039;d see the facts.  There are videos of SEIU members beating up people--black, white, it doesn&#039;t matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moho, you are reading too much into things.  It seems you are looking for a fight.  As for my view of history, I majored in history and am a big history buff.  We don&#8217;t want the US to be the way it was at the founding, we want the principles.  </p>
<p>As for the death panels and the SEIU thugs, if you read quotes from Obama and those he surounds himself with you&#8217;d see the facts.  There are videos of SEIU members beating up people&#8211;black, white, it doesn&#8217;t matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Attitude</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/whose-sovereignty-is-obama-respecting/#comment-378065</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Attitude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64494#comment-378065</guid>
		<description>66:  Why did you use my name instead of yours?  I&#039;ve been using Ms. Attitude on here for over a year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>66:  Why did you use my name instead of yours?  I&#8217;ve been using Ms. Attitude on here for over a year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms Attitude</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/whose-sovereignty-is-obama-respecting/#comment-378052</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms Attitude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64494#comment-378052</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t admit to standing for nothing, in fact. I don&#039;t propigate my beliefs here. I don&#039;t see the point in doing that. As I said quite clearly, I come here to show how easily disproven the articles here are, and how generally people who believe in such things are lazy thinkers. I do think that many libertarians have an odd view of history that excludes whatever isn&#039;t convenient to their model. And as for Democrats opposing Democratic policies, well they do it for all kinds of reasons. Right or wrong, they do seem to have a knack for actually understanding what their concerns are and outlining solutions. I see nothing like that here.

Lastly, as I said, I don&#039;t see this as a civil exchange of ideas. The amount of mendacity here should never be termed civil. If you believe in the craziness being propagated here--death panels and SEIU thugs and the like--then I would question what kind of civil discourse you&#039;re capable of having. IMO, people believe those things because they want to believe them, and they generally want to believe them for completely uncivil reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t admit to standing for nothing, in fact. I don&#8217;t propigate my beliefs here. I don&#8217;t see the point in doing that. As I said quite clearly, I come here to show how easily disproven the articles here are, and how generally people who believe in such things are lazy thinkers. I do think that many libertarians have an odd view of history that excludes whatever isn&#8217;t convenient to their model. And as for Democrats opposing Democratic policies, well they do it for all kinds of reasons. Right or wrong, they do seem to have a knack for actually understanding what their concerns are and outlining solutions. I see nothing like that here.</p>
<p>Lastly, as I said, I don&#8217;t see this as a civil exchange of ideas. The amount of mendacity here should never be termed civil. If you believe in the craziness being propagated here&#8211;death panels and SEIU thugs and the like&#8211;then I would question what kind of civil discourse you&#8217;re capable of having. IMO, people believe those things because they want to believe them, and they generally want to believe them for completely uncivil reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms. Attitude</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/whose-sovereignty-is-obama-respecting/#comment-378036</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Attitude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64494#comment-378036</guid>
		<description>Moho, interesting post.  You choose to call a group of people stupid based on their politcal beliefs while at the same time you admit to really standing for nothing.  What&#039;s that saying...if you don&#039;t stand for something, you&#039;ll fall for anything.  You also admit that some of the Democrats feel the same way as the Republican, do you call them stupid?  Where is your respect for your fellow Americans who are exercising their right to voice their opinion?  You may not agree but when you resort to name calling you make your point mute.  

It seems to me that you care nothing for what this great country stands for and what the founding fathers had invisioned.  Maybe the Libertarian party, according to you, is the old Republican party, wanting to get back to the grassroots of what made this country great.

Do you stand for anything besides creating discord in an otherwise civil exchange of ideas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moho, interesting post.  You choose to call a group of people stupid based on their politcal beliefs while at the same time you admit to really standing for nothing.  What&#8217;s that saying&#8230;if you don&#8217;t stand for something, you&#8217;ll fall for anything.  You also admit that some of the Democrats feel the same way as the Republican, do you call them stupid?  Where is your respect for your fellow Americans who are exercising their right to voice their opinion?  You may not agree but when you resort to name calling you make your point mute.  </p>
<p>It seems to me that you care nothing for what this great country stands for and what the founding fathers had invisioned.  Maybe the Libertarian party, according to you, is the old Republican party, wanting to get back to the grassroots of what made this country great.</p>
<p>Do you stand for anything besides creating discord in an otherwise civil exchange of ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: melibeaviva@ol.com</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/whose-sovereignty-is-obama-respecting/#comment-378006</link>
		<dc:creator>melibeaviva@ol.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64494#comment-378006</guid>
		<description>More disingenious drivel; It is obvious to anyone reading your troll ghostwriter&#039;s drivel,that you are an Obamanista affirmative action troll,who wants to emulate his idol&#039;s in his use of the teleprompter.You can&#039;t speak for the left!Yeah right! And Obama is not an inept boob!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More disingenious drivel; It is obvious to anyone reading your troll ghostwriter&#8217;s drivel,that you are an Obamanista affirmative action troll,who wants to emulate his idol&#8217;s in his use of the teleprompter.You can&#8217;t speak for the left!Yeah right! And Obama is not an inept boob!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moho</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/whose-sovereignty-is-obama-respecting/#comment-377999</link>
		<dc:creator>Moho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=64494#comment-377999</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;How come the left is no longer against the Iraq war? How come they are no longer raising Cain about the Patriot Act? How come they are no longer complaining about “welfare” to corporations? Weren’t these the reasons they hated the right? Did they stop all the noise because the left owns them now? Why is it about left v. right? Why did the left stop fighting for social freedoms when they elected the president? Are they no longer important? Is it the same reason that so many on the right turned a blind eye to fiscally irresponsible president because they elected him?&lt;/i&gt;

Well, if you&#039;re asking honestly I can&#039;t speak for the left. I&#039;m not sure I would count as a member of that boogeyman organization. However, you&#039;re right if you mean that now that its an Obama war, people have largely stopped criticizing it. However, there are many, many, many organizations and people who oppose it just as vehemently today as they did months ago. As can also be observed, a significant number of the left are fighting against Obama&#039;s health care proposal because they see it as an abandonment of his mandate to fix health care and insurance. 

I will also add that the Republican administration has claimed for years that the wars in both Afghanistan and Iraq were over. Do you believe that? Do you believe they were over in 2008 and suddenly have started again now that its convenient to blame them on a Democratic president?

Finally, the left/right dichotomy as it exists today began in the mid to late sixties. Traditionally, the left has supported a progressive move to greater civil liberties and a remedy to the excesses of capitalism. The right has supported a maintenance of the status quo or even a return to an imagined past era. Today, there is less difference between the left and right than one would expect, due to the proliferation of commercial interests and their unregulated interference in the Democratic process. 

As for, MSNBC probably bothers me as much as it does you; however, there are one or two programs, like Rachel Maddow that have a level of journalistic integrity not seen on other networks. 

I don&#039;t see any way out of that, nor do I actually advocate any solution to the mess we&#039;re in here. I come here because the level of stupidity in the Republican discourse is simply unmatched in its offensive stupidity. There is nothing like this in the whole world. Frankly, I&#039;m tired of these stupid people reflecting on my country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>How come the left is no longer against the Iraq war? How come they are no longer raising Cain about the Patriot Act? How come they are no longer complaining about “welfare” to corporations? Weren’t these the reasons they hated the right? Did they stop all the noise because the left owns them now? Why is it about left v. right? Why did the left stop fighting for social freedoms when they elected the president? Are they no longer important? Is it the same reason that so many on the right turned a blind eye to fiscally irresponsible president because they elected him?</i></p>
<p>Well, if you&#8217;re asking honestly I can&#8217;t speak for the left. I&#8217;m not sure I would count as a member of that boogeyman organization. However, you&#8217;re right if you mean that now that its an Obama war, people have largely stopped criticizing it. However, there are many, many, many organizations and people who oppose it just as vehemently today as they did months ago. As can also be observed, a significant number of the left are fighting against Obama&#8217;s health care proposal because they see it as an abandonment of his mandate to fix health care and insurance. </p>
<p>I will also add that the Republican administration has claimed for years that the wars in both Afghanistan and Iraq were over. Do you believe that? Do you believe they were over in 2008 and suddenly have started again now that its convenient to blame them on a Democratic president?</p>
<p>Finally, the left/right dichotomy as it exists today began in the mid to late sixties. Traditionally, the left has supported a progressive move to greater civil liberties and a remedy to the excesses of capitalism. The right has supported a maintenance of the status quo or even a return to an imagined past era. Today, there is less difference between the left and right than one would expect, due to the proliferation of commercial interests and their unregulated interference in the Democratic process. </p>
<p>As for, MSNBC probably bothers me as much as it does you; however, there are one or two programs, like Rachel Maddow that have a level of journalistic integrity not seen on other networks. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see any way out of that, nor do I actually advocate any solution to the mess we&#8217;re in here. I come here because the level of stupidity in the Republican discourse is simply unmatched in its offensive stupidity. There is nothing like this in the whole world. Frankly, I&#8217;m tired of these stupid people reflecting on my country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

