Whore-Gate: Who’s in Bed With Jerry Brown?
There is a story, probably apocryphal, often told about Winston Churchill. It’s the one in which he’s in conversation with an aristocratic woman, to whom he makes a proposal. “Madam,” he says, “would you sleep with me for five million pounds?”
“I suppose I would,” says the woman. “We would have to discuss the terms, of course.”
“Would you sleep with me for five pounds?” asks Churchill.
The woman is insulted. “What kind of woman do you think I am?” she asks.
“We’ve already established that,” Churchill says. “Now we’re haggling about the price.”
Apocryphal or not, the story illustrates a common human foible: For many people, perhaps most people, there are few deeds so repugnant as to preclude their consideration given the promise of sufficient reward. Everyone, as the saying goes, has his price.
If that’s the case, are we all not whores?
“Tut, tut, Dunphy,” you say. “Strong language there.”
Maybe so, but the word “whore” has been much in the news lately here in California, owing to an off-color remark made by someone on gubernatorial candidate Jerry Brown’s staff and inadvertently captured for posterity on voicemail. Ah, the blessings of modern communication technology. It allows a candidate to reach out and grub for endorsements from anywhere, and if the target of said grubbing isn’t around to answer the phone or perhaps is screening his calls and is not in the mood to talk politics, the candidate can leave his rambling and incoherent appeal on voicemail in the hope that the grubee will call back with the good news the candidate hopes to hear.
But those blessings are mixed, aren’t they. The candidate must master the machinery lest the machinery master him. He must learn to terminate the call before engaging in chitchat with his retinue, especially if a member of that retinue is in the habit of referring to the candidate’s rival as a whore.
One can imagine the scene in the Brown campaign office. Brown makes the call to Scott Rate, a member of the board of directors for the Los Angeles Police Protective League, the labor union that represents rank-and-file LAPD officers. (Full disclosure: I am a longtime member of the LAPPL.) Brown gets Rate’s voicemail and leaves a message making a play for the League’s endorsement, demeaning the head of another law enforcement association in the process. Brown concludes the call, or rather thinks he does, and then goes on to discuss Meg Whitman’s position on law enforcement pensions.
Ok…this is just funny!
The ancedot is from Bertrand Russell.
It’s an apocryphal story told about many different people, and “anecdote” has an “e”.
It’s very commonly attributed to Mark Twain.
… and George Bernard Shaw.
What in hell are the people of California smoking? Jerry Brown has proven to be a completely useless public servant in every position he has attained. Why, after having already been a useless Governor, is he even on the ballot for that job? California needs to catch up with the rest of the country, eh?
The whole issue for me is both Brown and Whitman are mealy mouthed twits and neither should be governor of any state. Exempting anyone is out of line…Meg…and Brown is just an idiot.
California is a lost cause
Please pray for me. I live in California.
Poor Boo
Get some good long straws so that you can still breath as you all sink deeper into the crapper. 1
We know what (many) Californians are smoking; it’s now called medicinal and it seems to hide the pain of making life decisions. Trouble is, it affects those who don’t smoke it as well. Vote for Meg Whitman.
“California needs to catch up with the rest of the country, eh?” Oh My! Please, don’t drag us down the crapper with you Sparky.
At least a whore has scruples. A politician? Not so much.
Yes, there are some things that whores won’t do.
That’s why it is perhaps an insult to call Gloria Allred a whore.
An insult to whores, that is.
The financial mess that California is now in was caused by Jerry Brown’s acquiescence in letting the unionization of those working for the State government. It was a quid pro quo, the Unions back the Democrats with truck loads of money and the Democrats give to the Unions anything they want which means financial disaster. California is a microcosm of what Obama is attempting to do, load the bureaucracy with SEIU members and milk the country dry for the benefit of the Democrats and the Unions. The question is, what has Brown promised this time for the union backing, there is nothing left to give?
More crime = more cops. More cops = more union dues.
Do you think Governor Moonbeam’s policies are going to reduce crime? Do you think the union exists to do anything but further its own interests first, then those of the members?
Next you will tell me that teacher’s unions place educational achievement above the union member’s financial interests. I will be forced to call you naive or worse, so let’s stop here.
I cannot believe Jerry is brave enough to even stick his head out in public in California after what this guy has done to the state! Even a lynching would be too good for this man. This guy embodies everything that is wrong with a politician, and he actually has large enough nads to actually brag about all the time he has spent on the government take, like it makes him more worthy of the position! If California elects this guy I hope they quickly get out of the Union and join Mexico… becuase that will be the final nail in that States coffin.
“He needs to be horse-whipped; hangings too good for him!”
Talking to a young Cop a year ago and he said he was probably going to vote for his Boss, the Attorney General Jerry Brown.
As a gun-owner, Meg Whitman has proved to be entirely hostile to 2nd Amendment issues and takes a Ruling-Class approach that the serfs and little people should be disarmed. She is just as arch, elitist, and uncivil as her Democrat foes and definitely does not have the common-man touch. Jerry Brown, for all his inanity, has been a gun-rights supporter. In fact he has disappointed death penalty foes and gun control proponents who hoped he would support their causes, so much so that they complained noisily when Brown filed his own friend-of-the-court brief re: HELLER, asking that Chicago’s gun ban be overturned – arguing that if the court doesn’t act, “California citizens could be deprived of the constitutional right to possess handguns in their homes.”
Whitman’s identity as a Republican is simply a Rhino “R” badge that gets her into the Big Country Club in Sacramento alongside the “D” badges, it gives her access to power. IMO she’s about as conservative as any Menlo Park hausfrau – they all hire their maid-service from the East Menlo Park and Redwood City barrios.
“Jerry Brown, for all his inanity, has been a gun-rights supporter.”
And this is why Californians should be stuck with someone who’s otherwise an unelectable loon? Good luck Cali, you’re gonna get what ya paid for.
The amicus brief was filed in McDonald, not Heller.
The cynic would say that Jerry is very good at “reading the tide”, and he filed the brief to get on a winning side before the decision, unlike what he did in 1978 re Prop-13.
Rose Bird was tossed out in ’86, not ’87.
As a former genuine, authentic and ditzy “Valley Girl”, I can tell you that, characteristically, nannygate and whoregate WILL influence voters in California. (Well, maybe not whoregate, but nannygate for sure.
)
Griff Harsh, the husband of California gubernatorial candidate Nutmeg Whitman, acknowledged in a statement on Thursday that “it is possible” he received and wrote notes on a letter from the Social Security Administration back in 2003, regarding the former Housekeeper/Maid. The Harsh/ Whitman household then fired their housekeeper in June 2009 (after nine years of service), when Nutmeg handlers decided that she was an election liability.
And now the Jill Armstrong, a former full-time nanny of the Harsh/ Whitman dungeon, came to the defense of the Housekeeper/Maid and told the San Francisco Chronicle that she believes Diaz’s claim because she “know[s] the family” and “what it was like.”
Meg, Meg, Meg, where do I start, you have reportedly spent $140 million of your own money to get elected Governor but you couldn’t use some of it to get your housekeeper (after nine years of service) some legal help to get her papers, and worse you lied about it. Wow, what a WITCH, of course I meant it with a “B”.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#39450925
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGRrNs8-s5w
But your comments on holding employers accountable for hiring undocumented workers real takes the cake, I assume you exempt yourself and your husband, or will you be turning yourself in.
Meg on holding employers accountable:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4fWLHiw8zA
Meg you think you can buy the election, but what puzzles many is if you real cared and loved California then why not do your civic duty and vote, seems more rhetoric than anything else.
In good times we might give you a try but not in our disaster mode that we find ourselves in after that so-called outsider Independent Republican, named Arnold Schwarzenegger (sold to us by radio personalities John and Ken), ruined our state, yah we will trust another one of you liars, think not. And another thing nine years this maid was in your house, in your house and you failed to learned this major thing about her, come on this sounds like a huge lie that no one can believe in.
Ebay paid out $200,000 because Nutmeg assaulted an employee, so it’s not the first time she has mistreated an employee. Good luck winning Nutmeg, money will buy you admiration from the majority just from the Gay Old Party (GOP), but not from all of California.
Montana,
If you don’t like Whitman, that is fine with me. Just don’t try to use Diaz and Allred as proof that your hatred is somehow rational. Diaz claimed to be a legal immigrant and produced fake documents to support that claim. Whitman accepted those documents at face value. Are you suggesting that employers should assume that documents produced by Hispanic immigrants are fake? Would you feel better if Whitman had assumed that Diaz was an illegal immigrant and ignored the documents?
Whitman and her husband got a letter suggesting there was an anomaly with the social security numbers, The letter specifically said that the anomaly should not be considered proof that the employee was an illegal immigrant. Whitman’s husband followed the instructions in the letter and asked Diaz to check into the problem. Would you feel better if they had fired Diaz immediately?
When Diaz finally admitted she was not a legal immigrant, she was fired. She was not turned over to the immigration authorities. Would you feel better if Diaz had been jailed and then deported? Yes, Whitman could tried to help Diaz legally, but why should she? What obligation does any employer have to an employee who deliberately commits fraud?
I have no great love for Whitman. If I were in California, I would almost certainly be doing what I am doing here in New York: wishing I could vote for a better Republican. Whitman may have flaws, but the absurd farce provided by Allred proves nothing.
Isn’t it Federal law that once a prospective employee has produced two pieces of identification, asking for more is a violation? Had Whitman asked for more proof she would have been violating the law. Republicans and Democrats alike have benefitted from illegal immigrants. In the 1960′s the Farm Workers, with Caesar Chavez, protested against illegal immigrants, because it drove down their wages. Now, Democrats are exploiting them.
We have created an attractive nuisance. By tolerating this, we are allowing people to put their lives at risk. Allowing illegal immigration to flourish is immoral.
“Meg, Meg, Meg”…?
Montana. Where the hell is sleazits? Montana? Montana?
Will the first name Butch?
Butch Montana sleazits Kyber. Liar. Cesspool.
Who is Van Jones?
dumb puke remarks that only you would make
I hate such ignorant drivel. “After 9 years of service, why couldn’t she…?”
She does not owe her employee anything! Nothing! When your boss pays you what he owes, he owes you nothing else. You are even! It is a business transaction.
Now, a wise employer takes good care of his people. Whitman did. She paid this illegal immigrant $23/hr to be a housekeeper! This same person entered her employment with a lie, jeopardizing her employer’s very livelihood. (CEO’s have to be very careful to adhere to laws.)
When the truth came out, she did what was required of her by law. She fired her lying, criminal a**! She doesn’t owe her a damned cent, much less help getting her legal!
You are just another Jackass.
I think it was George Bernard Shaw who coined the whore analogy
Meg claims she’ll run the State like a business – but it’s not a business and its almost too far gone. It would be nice if Prop 23 passes and the insanity of the Air Resources Board is curtailed – or if she does as she says and suspends a law (for a year) that’s based on fraud and a 340% scientific calculation error, produced by a man with fraudulent mail-order academic credentials kn own by the head of the BOARD, that’s devastating the trucking industry and was intended to influence National Policy. She said she would, but what can she do about CARB and its extra-legal and un-elected membership?
To see here vie for Union support with Brown shows how quickly she might sprint to the power of the Left once she’s in office, or else she’ll get pwned like Arnold.
I’m genuinely sad that this is the best the democrats can muster, this lame old progressive, Governor Moonbeam, under whose policies CA could not possibly recover from its deep financial straits.
A drunk turtle would be preferable to this tired old hippie.
I didn’t really care about the “whore” statement at first… I strongly suspect derogatory comments directed towards Brown are not unknown at Whitman staff meetings.
But then, the National Organization of Whores almost immediately came out with their endorsement of Brown (really, does anything empower a woman like calling her a whore?), and I realized I was adhering to a double standard. If something like this came out against a Republican, then it would be a national scandal.
So, in a conscious effort to avoid being hypocritical, I am pretending to be outraged.
I’ve been talking to some Republicans who work for the candidates and it looks grim. Brown’s stunt with Whitman’s nanny was dirty and effective. It looks like the Latino vote is in his pocket. I still can’t figure out how paying a nanny $23 per hour is abusive. There are plenty of nannies who work for ten dollars an hour and I think that’s overpaying them. In the Senate race, Boxer’s attack ads are also working. She’s gone from a one point lead to seven point lead. In the house race, Waxman is a shoe in. He is so confident that he won’t even debate Wilkerson. When I think of it, it leaves me with a hollow feeling in the pit of my stomach. Its amazing, these people will get voted in again and everyone will wonder why this State is going to hell. I don’t think I can stand another four years of Brown and Waxman, let alone six more years of Boxer. Maybe its time to move to Arizona?
Of the two candidates who are on the ballot, which offers the best chance for turning California around? Which has the better track record at running a business? Which offers the better CV for reinstating financial credibility to a state that has found itself losing businesses, personnel, and their resultant tax bases to states such as Texas? Those of us who remember Brown from previous iterations find him lacking important qualities that California desperately needs. Meg Whitman, on the other hand, has a proven track record in business and can make tough decisions that will benefit the state long-term. The housekeeper issue is an obvious red herring. People need to tackle the important issue: who has the executive experience to increase jobs via sound business decisions, curb spending and stop spending our grandchildren’s money? Brown will be in over his head and his pay grade, just as Obama has been; both doomed by ideological shackles. Brown will be a disaster for a state that is already slip sliding away.
PLEASE don’t scare me like that, Dunphy!
The thought of Justice Gloria Allred is too much to contemplate! But it is a plausible threat.
As for Brown, one of his creations was the California Energy Commission. What does it do – besides spend $500 million a year of taxpayer money? Let’s defeat Brown and kill this teat on the treasury and bureaucratic Energy Nanny.
This is how paying a cleaner/nanny $23/hr works in Menlo Park, Palo Alto, and Atherton.
1.) She works for a “service” – which insulates the buyer from certain knowledge.
2.) The Service takes their %50 cut (same as Kelly or Manpower) and keeps $13 of the $23 – so she gets $10 to split with the two other people (normally illegal aliens) who enter the house to clean.
3.) Those other people on the crew are often family, even kids, so she doesn’t have to actually split much with them since she has the driver’s license and takes them to the job.
It happens all around the Bay Area.
It is a mystery to any politically astute individual, Jerry Brown has never worked in the private sector, Son of a Former California Governor. Brown has never known any other life than “Political” needs and culture.
The California Voter has a opportunity to make the correct decision for the future of the State. Brown is, for sure, a known quanity, Meg Whitman, not a politician, but may be qualified to tackle the state political class and debt. She, will do a superior job to Brown, everyone in the whole country knows what Brown represents. More Spending and higher tax rates and additionsl unpaid debt.
Based upon the polls of the Brown/Whitman race, the voters are willing to take the state into the final crash, and vote for Brown. Same appears for Barbara Boxer/Carly Forina. There is no one in the U.S.Senate with a more Left Wing Political Agenda than Boxer.
GOOD BY CALIFORINA, THE STATE WILL BE A 3RD WORLD COUNTRY IN 10 YEARS.
Simple dude, we went from liberal Davis to middle of the road Arni, Californians aren’t prepared to tilt the scales wholeheartedly conservative, we just aren’t ready “to see what happens” if these particular nominated Republicans get elected, too large of gamble for many.
Victor/Victoria
To our friends and compatriots in California, do you know what the definition of insanity is?
Doing the same thing over and over and over again expecting different results.
I don’t know what else to say except put this man out of your misery and send him off to retire south of the border. They can use some liberal guidance down there. He can peacenik all over the drug cartels. I’m sure they’ll be totally on board with his message.
of course brown and his camp were referring to being a political whore, not accusing meg of turning tricks as most of the reportage would have us believe.
i lived in california when jerry was the guv and, not that everything can be attributed to him, those were pretty good days in the golden state. i also lived in oakland while he was the mayor..he kept his campaign promises and transformed the downtown from a virtual ghost town to a thriving cultural center which has lured many exurbans back to living in the city. he was completely accessible..one could run into him walking his dog or taking his daily run around lake merritt and easily engage him in conversation. all in all, not a terrible record. i’d certainly take another chance on his governorship over the candidate who is, quite literally, attempting to buy the position with her great personal wealth. brown can seem a bit erratic in his style, but he’s not buying endless advertising, the content of which is…well..let’s just say less than truthful. if there were a third viable alternative, i might consider him/her, but given the choice we have, i’ll stick with brown.
Brown was an effective mayor for Oakland in many ways, I’ll agree. However, he came in for some heavy criticism of his methods at time. so much so that I took to calling him “Jack Boot Brown.” His police seemed to ignore many Constitutional protections although that might have been the Leftists hoping to get away with anarchy. I did appreciate when he sent in the police to ensure that the port of Oakland remained open for shipment of military goods to Iraq.
A more telling performance has been as state Attorney General the last few years. I found him to be a demogogue on many issues, always seeking the headlines. He also ran his office as one would expect a moderately hard-line Leftist would, ignoring immigration and other issues important to conservatives.
Like Willie Brown, who was a better major for San Francisco than as a legislative leader, Jerry Brown might have found his level of competency as a big city mayor.
Of course, I wouldn’t live in either city whether or not it was lead by either Brown.
“of course brown and his camp were referring to being a political whore, not accusing meg of turning tricks as most of the reportage would have us believe.”
I’m not sure that’s relevant, though… this is politics, after all. If the political parties were reversed, the “whore” comment would be a national scandal… therefore I’m sticking with pretending to be outraged in order to avoid hypocrisy.
Dale Ogden is the only gubernatorial candidate worth his salt. Of course, he won’t win. Whitman, though a definite RINO, is a better pick than Brown.
Come to think of it, it would be thrilling if Brown became the Fools Golden State governor. We could then rename it Greece. I would only insist that the Republican Congress bar any federal funds to prop it up. Let Mr. Moonbeam and the flakes surrounding him sink or swim on their own. I rememeber during the great energy crisis that plagued Californ-I-A a few years back. All the whining and bitching because of brownouts and such. The travails of Cal-Ed. No air conditioning. Oh, the pain. I could never understand why the good people of California were upset? After all, they overwhelmingly voted to stifle any energy developlment. No to nuclear. No to more new coal plants. Why, will just rely on Mr. Sunshine and the wind fairies. I would have thought that all of the enlightened citizens would have revelled at the opportunity to leap on their bicycles and pedal down to the coast to watch the whales copulate.
GERRYMANDER. Of course it’s insane to do the same thing over and over and over again expecting different results, but Democrats don’t expect or want different results: THE STATE IS GERRYMANDERED and misrepresented. We have to end that.
That’s where Proposition 20 comes in and fixes that.
AND That’s why they are fighting it with a counter proposition 27 which is supported by $100,000 from GEORGE SOROS, and $1,250,000 from AFSCME – the second- or third-largest labor union in the United States (the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees), and local state-politicians who have donated hundred$ of thou$and$ to defeat it.
They hate it and are running Prop-27 hard to confuse the public further and to kill Prop-20.
27 would repeal Prop-11 which created the California Citizens Redistricting Commission, and return redistricting to the $au$age-pot of the Sacramento Stupid$lature.
But still, who will CARB? They’re an independent legislative body that came up with the fraudulently derived and unscientific AB23?
In 1978 the Police Protective League did endorse Jerry Brown for his re-election as Gov. In return he signed the Police Officers Bill of Rights Legislation (passed by the Legislature)this was probably the most important piece of legislation that protected officers from the negligent way they were treated regarding interrogations, interviews, gave them representation by attorneys and their peers acting as defense representatives and much more. This legislation was strongly opposed by the Chiefs of the police depts in the state. Three of the League Directors on the Board of Directors were voted out of office for the position they took. The fourth Director decided not to run for re-election. Jerry Brown was also opposed to Prop 13, which controlled the rate of taxation on a families home. As to why the Protective League (a union) would support Democrats is because Dems are employee friendly and will spend the money to increase benefits that are important to the worker. Republicans may increase the penalties for criminals and be supportive on law enforcement issues, but that is not what you spend when you buy anything and are supporting a family. When a contract is agreed upon the officers want to know what their salary increase is going to be or health benefits will be and want those who support their pension plans. Now Brown ‘may’ do that but I have a feeling that the officers today wouldn’t tolerate a Brown endorsement.
It is time for the BIG earthquake, at least Meg is spending her own money, I think because Ca. is broke. Jerry is still using money donated to him but that will not effect his agenda [wink wink].
The majority of Californians are sick of the GOP and the failure of steroid Arnold Alois Schwarzenegger,what a joke. Are you surprise that the majority are turning away from the Nutmeg. She is only trying buy the election, someone made alot of money on her failed attempt.
SOCIAL SECURITY FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS SAYS DEMOCRATS
These are the most critical points to bear in mind, when arriving at the polling stations to vote. The most treacherous person to re-elect is Senator Harry Reid of Nevada. Part of his main formula in issues, is the passage of Amnesty for all illegal immigrants squatting in this country. Second to go should be Senator Barbara Boxer as she has been conditioned by the Liberal hierarchy, and has attributed to the out spending rampage, the illegal alien benefits in California. Hopefully Carly Fiorina will win on her merits and stop this third country, banana republic, low income poor importation. This must be sterilized as the cost to compel another Path to Citizenship should terrify every prudent American. The most nonpartisan organization known as the Heritage Foundation, has calculated the dollar numbers and projected that that to create this new law will cost US taxpayers–$ 2.6 TRILLION DOLLARS. This is just at the federal level and doesn’t take into account State and local government expenditures.
America already owes foreign governments 11 to 13 Trillion dollars and an additional 2.6 Trillion dollars is an incomprehensible financial nightmare. Then again, Liberal-Democrats want to share our Social Security with illegal aliens (Voted May 2006)? This is the height of disgusting, when retirees and the disabled have been told no increase next year, owing to low inflation. Many recipients cannot even manage on the Social Security check as it is, yet the US government has money to hand out to illegal labor and their families.
GOOGLE–Harry Reid; Amnesty; Path to Citizenship; always add illegal alien costs. Investigating these keywords will offer hundreds of articles and reports of taxes you’re paying to support this pestilence. The welfare entitlement programs from federal, state and local government are being compromised by foreign nationals, who are pilfering your money through over-taxation; blue and white collar jobs; the lowering of wages.
Gubernatorial Wannabe Jerry Brown ideology is one of the same as Reid, Boxer and the Mayor of the Sanctuary City of San Francisco Gavin Newsom, while California’s budget remains crippled. All these Liberals disguised as Centralist Democrats are pro–AMNESTY. All would pass bills to open tuition fees to illegal alien children on the taxpayers back in colleges and state universities and keep the massive welfare programs from Sacramento.We must clean the rancid air in this sanctuary state and stop catering to illegal aliens, who are criminals; they broke the law. The second most disgraceful issue is that of voter fraud resurfacing around the country. In most states there are no compulsory regulations to identifying the voter and so the federal system can be effortlessly compromised. The “Honor System” died back in the early 1990, and trust went out the window. Just GOOGLE–Voter fraud and highlight registration groups such being (ACORN) Association of Community Organization for Reform Now with workers complicit in changing the direction of the vote as in previous elections.
This can be a serious threat in races, which are within a hairs breath of each candidate winning. With just 20 days left until the Nov. 2 midterm election, party tensions in Houston Texas are running high over allegations of enormous voter fraud. Amid the conclusion were that only 1,793 of the 25,000 registrations the group submitted appeared to be valid. Elicit registrations included one of a woman who registered six times in the same day; registrations of illegal aliens; so many applications from one of the Houston Voters collectors in one day, that it was deemed to be beyond human ability; and 1,597 registrations that named the same individual multiple times, often with different signatures. Now the Liberal nonprofit Houston Votes 2010, along with Tex Together Fund, are being investigated by the state’s attorney general’s agency over allegations of fraud, conspiracy and ties to the New organized Black Panthers. Other voter fraud has began to materialize elsewhere across the country, more so in registrations.
If it wasn’t for the Tea Party’s vigilance this type of voter fraud would have remained likely undisclosed, especially now the Liberal-Democrats party is under the axe. We must be particularly heedful of illegal aliens voting–either deliberately or because both parties have not illustrated federal regulations strong enough, warning of the consequences. Illegal aliens have already broken laws on illegal passage into the US, so affecting the course of any general election has no significant risk with imprisonment or a hurtful fine; just deportation. The third issue is to enforce laws we already passed in 1986 by Congress. If enforced the regulations would have curtailed employers hiring. Build the–REAL–double fence at the border and stopped There is also evidence that illegal immigrants without exclusionary criminal convictions are being released at ICE discretion back on the streets, which according to the Simpson/Mazzoli law is illegal.
Being in this country illegally should require deportation, as it will obviously compel more people to enter America. Sen. H. Reid and Senate Democrats of nearly tabling E-Verify, limiting the effect of this labor verification program to a voluntary law. The 287(g) local police enforcement authority is now in the justice system as a class action law suit, to overturn the law. The usual court filing excuse is it leads to racial profiling, particularly among Latinos, creating a dread of authority in non-citizen communities. The crisis being that we have been invaded and over the last two decades of people attracting to jobs and accessing public benefits. This is why Border States have condemned themselves to a massive influx of illegal households subsisting on freebies, using bogus documents or bringing babies here for citizenship to exploit the nationwide entitlement system. Research on any Computer Search Engine Browser and seek your own truths and not the lies fabricated by the Liberal media or the colluding politicians.
BLAH,BLAH,BLAH….:~o
PS. What’s your First Language, Because it’s Not English!
Jerry the Fairy is an incompetent communist.The police “union” is unable to strike; hence is just an extortion scam by its paid officers, whores to whatever politicians wish to use them. No sane person would look over Moonbeams’ dossier and then allow him to walk their dog.Thats why he headquarters in Oakland, where only a tiny minority is sane.
The Republicans are so funny, when the economy is good you say let’s all celebrate “Cinco de Mayo, my brothers” but when the economy is down “it’s all your fault, you damn immigrant”. When most Americans (with Latin America roots) go to the polls this November we will remember that the GOP has gone on a nationwide rant in proposing and passing several anti-immigration legislation (that our US Courts continue to strike down) and have continue to blame the immigrant for the flat economy or worse. We will remember who stands with us and who stands against us, so trying to stop it now is somewhat funny, but go ahead, you will not change our minds.
Plus the more radical of the GOP are now attacking our Constitution and our Bill of Rights, in their crazy notion of wanting to take away rights that all of us take for granted in their misguided attempt to garner some much needed votes, they really are fools, and leading the GOP towards obscurity because they are no longer a party of ideas, just of empty suits. Your hate made you do it, in November; you will reap what you have sown. I wonder what Abraham Lincoln would say about todays GOP, he unlike the current GOP was a man of ideas.
AMEN BROTHER, AMEN!