<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Do Stan Laurel, a Shark and Hillary Have In Common?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/what_do_stan_laurel_a_shark_an/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/what_do_stan_laurel_a_shark_an/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:11:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FireFireFire</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/what_do_stan_laurel_a_shark_an/#comment-17539</link>
		<dc:creator>FireFireFire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 08:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-do-stan-laurel-a-shark-and-hillary-have-in-common/#comment-17539</guid>
		<description>pch103: Fred was a senator BEFORE he was an actor.
For his first role,he played himself.
Most if not all actors mentioned in this article are considered &quot;A&quot; list.
Actors are as entitled to their political opinions as the next guy,even if the next guy flips burgers or whatever.
What bothers most &quot;Next guys&quot; is we don&#039;t get access to the same amount of media coverage when we voice our opinion.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pch103: Fred was a senator BEFORE he was an actor.<br />
For his first role,he played himself.<br />
Most if not all actors mentioned in this article are considered &#8220;A&#8221; list.<br />
Actors are as entitled to their political opinions as the next guy,even if the next guy flips burgers or whatever.<br />
What bothers most &#8220;Next guys&#8221; is we don&#8217;t get access to the same amount of media coverage when we voice our opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tanstaafl</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/what_do_stan_laurel_a_shark_an/#comment-17538</link>
		<dc:creator>tanstaafl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-do-stan-laurel-a-shark-and-hillary-have-in-common/#comment-17538</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;But what, you ask, do the politicians provide in return? ...gravitas.&lt;/i&gt;

gravitas by proxy

It&#039;s always embarrassing to read a Babs Streisand rant filled with misspellings.

(and that&#039;s after being vetted by her &quot;people&quot;)

It&#039;s all flowing together, sports, politics, entertainment.

Against this deluge of Hollowwood BS, I just boycott their movies.  (not that I particularly needed to see S. Penn, G. Clooney et al films in the first place)

I think S. Spielberg is hugely talented, but I didn&#039;t appreciate his agenda in his film Munich.  Redacted, Rendition, Lions for Lambs, they can all happily lose money.

Hollowwood might wake up to that message.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But what, you ask, do the politicians provide in return? &#8230;gravitas.</i></p>
<p>gravitas by proxy</p>
<p>It&#8217;s always embarrassing to read a Babs Streisand rant filled with misspellings.</p>
<p>(and that&#8217;s after being vetted by her &#8220;people&#8221;)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all flowing together, sports, politics, entertainment.</p>
<p>Against this deluge of Hollowwood BS, I just boycott their movies.  (not that I particularly needed to see S. Penn, G. Clooney et al films in the first place)</p>
<p>I think S. Spielberg is hugely talented, but I didn&#8217;t appreciate his agenda in his film Munich.  Redacted, Rendition, Lions for Lambs, they can all happily lose money.</p>
<p>Hollowwood might wake up to that message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pch1013</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/what_do_stan_laurel_a_shark_an/#comment-17537</link>
		<dc:creator>pch1013</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-do-stan-laurel-a-shark-and-hillary-have-in-common/#comment-17537</guid>
		<description>Has anyone asked Fred Thompson what he thinks of B-list celebrities meddling in politics? Maybe that could be part of his next PJM interview.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone asked Fred Thompson what he thinks of B-list celebrities meddling in politics? Maybe that could be part of his next PJM interview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BMoon</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/what_do_stan_laurel_a_shark_an/#comment-17536</link>
		<dc:creator>BMoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 01:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-do-stan-laurel-a-shark-and-hillary-have-in-common/#comment-17536</guid>
		<description>Somehow, I figure these not-funny pairings has something to do with religion - or lack of it - and power. After making obscene amounts of easy money for playing flawed or even demented personalities, and having spent it on every possible whim,impulse,and exhorbitant foolishnes conceivable, the Hollywood creature looks for some kind of relief from his seared conscience while at the same time, seeking to fulfill the last lust not immediately available to him -political power. Didn{t &gt;marx say that politics is the real opiate of the godless...somthing like that. Latching onto leftist political causes with mesianic fervor and religious zeal, they get to both believe that their excesses and selfishness are atoned for, while getting a rare thrill in a life where nothing excites anymore.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow, I figure these not-funny pairings has something to do with religion &#8211; or lack of it &#8211; and power. After making obscene amounts of easy money for playing flawed or even demented personalities, and having spent it on every possible whim,impulse,and exhorbitant foolishnes conceivable, the Hollywood creature looks for some kind of relief from his seared conscience while at the same time, seeking to fulfill the last lust not immediately available to him -political power. Didn{t &gt;marx say that politics is the real opiate of the godless&#8230;somthing like that. Latching onto leftist political causes with mesianic fervor and religious zeal, they get to both believe that their excesses and selfishness are atoned for, while getting a rare thrill in a life where nothing excites anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalton B. Jackman</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/what_do_stan_laurel_a_shark_an/#comment-17535</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalton B. Jackman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 23:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-do-stan-laurel-a-shark-and-hillary-have-in-common/#comment-17535</guid>
		<description>Glitz for gravitas, right.  More like brain-farts for blowhards, sycophants for suck-ups or hoties for hot air.  These people crave the public adoration of the ring-kissers.  Biggest difference is that the average politician can think on his feet, whereas most actors(being dumb as posts)need scripts to look intelligent.

Actually, they&#039;re all acting.

My question is, why so many seemingly normal Americans fawn over and tolerate their endless and inane drivel?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glitz for gravitas, right.  More like brain-farts for blowhards, sycophants for suck-ups or hoties for hot air.  These people crave the public adoration of the ring-kissers.  Biggest difference is that the average politician can think on his feet, whereas most actors(being dumb as posts)need scripts to look intelligent.</p>
<p>Actually, they&#8217;re all acting.</p>
<p>My question is, why so many seemingly normal Americans fawn over and tolerate their endless and inane drivel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ecmfw6</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/what_do_stan_laurel_a_shark_an/#comment-17534</link>
		<dc:creator>ecmfw6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 19:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-do-stan-laurel-a-shark-and-hillary-have-in-common/#comment-17534</guid>
		<description>Yawn. Why the heck should I care about your opinion? Go get stuffed.



Blogging is a waste of bandwith.






</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yawn. Why the heck should I care about your opinion? Go get stuffed.</p>
<p>Blogging is a waste of bandwith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/what_do_stan_laurel_a_shark_an/#comment-17533</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 17:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-do-stan-laurel-a-shark-and-hillary-have-in-common/#comment-17533</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the hapless celeb&#039;s attatch themselves to social issues because they want to displace some of the guilt they have for not really doing something important by acting.
Spencer Tracy said, &quot;Plumbing is a more honorable profession than acting.&quot; Robert Mitchum said, &quot; What&#039;s so hard about acting? You learn the lines, you go on the set and say them then you go home.&quot;
Just a thought. I really don&#039;t have the time to figure out the celebrity mind.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the hapless celeb&#8217;s attatch themselves to social issues because they want to displace some of the guilt they have for not really doing something important by acting.<br />
Spencer Tracy said, &#8220;Plumbing is a more honorable profession than acting.&#8221; Robert Mitchum said, &#8221; What&#8217;s so hard about acting? You learn the lines, you go on the set and say them then you go home.&#8221;<br />
Just a thought. I really don&#8217;t have the time to figure out the celebrity mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/what_do_stan_laurel_a_shark_an/#comment-17532</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 16:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-do-stan-laurel-a-shark-and-hillary-have-in-common/#comment-17532</guid>
		<description>&quot;It&#039;s not enough, after all, that the world envy them their fame and fortune. These assorted high school drop-outs and high maintenance nincompoops want to be taken seriously.&quot;

You&#039;re talking about bloggers, right?


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s not enough, after all, that the world envy them their fame and fortune. These assorted high school drop-outs and high maintenance nincompoops want to be taken seriously.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re talking about bloggers, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ike Andrews</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/what_do_stan_laurel_a_shark_an/#comment-17531</link>
		<dc:creator>Ike Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 07:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-do-stan-laurel-a-shark-and-hillary-have-in-common/#comment-17531</guid>
		<description>So, what symbiotic relationship might explain why some folks put so much weight into the opinions of these pilot fish in the first place?  One theory: those who profess the same political beliefs of their idols feel a vicarious sense of adoration.  It works something like this:  If I feel the same way about an issue that Oprah does, and Oprah is adored my millions, could I not also be so adored for thinking the same way?  Plausible explanation or not, adopting the opinions of the famous, not matter how smart or ignorant, is at least an easy way out for those not willing to think for themselves.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what symbiotic relationship might explain why some folks put so much weight into the opinions of these pilot fish in the first place?  One theory: those who profess the same political beliefs of their idols feel a vicarious sense of adoration.  It works something like this:  If I feel the same way about an issue that Oprah does, and Oprah is adored my millions, could I not also be so adored for thinking the same way?  Plausible explanation or not, adopting the opinions of the famous, not matter how smart or ignorant, is at least an easy way out for those not willing to think for themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

